Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/063,678

METHOD OF ISOLATING CIRCULATING TUMOR CELLS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 08, 2022
Priority
Feb 02, 2013 — provisional 61/760,042 +5 more
Examiner
XIAO, YAN
Art Unit
1642
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Menarini Silicon Biosystems S P A
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
518 granted / 770 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +53% interview lift
Without
With
+52.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
800
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 770 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/27/2026 and 02/24/2026 have been entered. Claims 1-15 are pending in the application. Claims 1-6 and 12-15 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 06/13/2025. 4. Claims 7-11 have been examined. Grounds of Objection and Rejection Withdrawn Unless specifically reiterated below, Applicant’s amendment and/or arguments have obviated or rendered moot the grounds of objection and rejection set forth in the previous Office action mailed 11/24/2025. Grounds of Rejection Maintained Double Patenting 6. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 7. Claims 7-11 remain rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-19 of U.S. Patent No. 11,567,081. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because for the following reasons: Claims 7-11 are herein drawn to a kit for isolating or capturing a circulating tumor cell in a biological sample, the kit comprising:(1) a capture agent comprising an antibody specifically binding at least one epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) biomarker; and (2) at least one staining reagent for confirming the capture of the circulating tumor cell, wherein the at least one staining reagent comprises a detectably labeled β-catenin antibody, wherein the detectably labeled β-catenin antibody allows detection of β-catenin expression on an intact cell to determine whether the intact cell is a circulating tumor cell. Claims 1-19 of U.S. Patent No. 11,567,081 are drawn to a kit for isolating or capturing a circulating tumor cell in a biological sample, the kit comprising: an antibody linked to a magnetic particle, wherein the antibody binds specifically to at least one epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) biomarker; and a detectably labelled anti-β-catenin antibody and a detectably labelled anti-CD31 antibody, wherein the detectably labelled anti-β-catenin antibody and the detectably labelled anti-CD31 antibody allow detection of β-catenin and CD31 on an intact cell to determine whether the intact cell is a circulating tumor cell. The Applicant’s arguments: The claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,567,081 require "an antibody linked to a magnetic particle," while the present claims do not. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been carefully considered but not found persuasive for the following reasons: Given the comprising language of the instant claim 7, the antibody of the patent meets the limitations of the instant claimed antibody. Therefore, the rejection is maintained for the reasons of record. Conclusion 8. No claim is allowed. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAN XIAO whose telephone number is (571)270-3578. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Samira Jean-Louis can be reached on 571-270-3503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAN XIAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Oct 07, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §DP
Jan 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747301
USE OF LANCL1 AND ANTIBODIES THEREOF AS A DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TARGET FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT OF CANCER
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741010
IMMUNOMODULATORY & ONCOLYTIC MINICELLS AND METHODS OF USE
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729239
ANTI-CEACAM5 ANTIBODIES AND CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOF
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723092
Anti-CXCR2 Antibodies and Uses Thereof
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698326
ANTI-CD19 ANTIBODY FORMULATIONS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+52.7%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 770 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month