Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/064,784

Robotic Arm With Hybrid Actuation Assemblies And Related Devices, Systems, And Methods

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 12, 2022
Priority
Dec 10, 2021 — provisional 63/288,486
Examiner
KNAUSS, CHRISTIAN D
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Virtual Incision Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
306 granted / 429 resolved
+1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
474
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 429 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 1-24 are pending in the application. Claims 7-9 and 16-20 have been withdrawn from consideration. Claims 1, 10, 21, and 22 have been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 21-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yeung et al. (US 2019/0321119 A1) (“Yeung”). Regarding claim 1, Yeung discloses (Figures 1-15D) a robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate body (210); (b) a robotic arm operably coupled to the elongate body, the robotic arm comprising: (i) an upper arm segment (360); (ii) a forearm segment (330) rotatably operably coupled to the upper arm segment at an elbow joint (234; Figure 5C; paragraph 0145); and (iii) at least two actuable components (end effector instrument 239, 342, 344 and wrist assembly 236) associated with the robotic arm; (c) a first cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a first actuator (332) disposed within the forearm segment (330, Figure 5J); and (ii) a motive force transfer cable (332a) operably coupled to the first actuator (332) and a first of the at least two actuable components (Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraph 0179); and (d) a first gear-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a second actuator (336) disposed within the forearm segment (Figure 5J); and (ii) at least one gear operably coupled to the second actuator and a second of the at least two actuable components (paragraphs 0174-0175). Regarding claim 5, Yeung discloses the first of the at least two actuable components comprises actuable end effector grasper arms (239, 342, 344; Figures 5D-5H), and wherein the second of the at least two actuable components comprises a rotatable end effector grasper body (346a). Regarding claim 6, Yeung discloses (Figures 5A-5J) that the first and second actuators (332, 336) are disposed within the forearm segment (330). Regarding claim 10, Yeung discloses (Figures 1-15D) a robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate body (210); (b) a robotic arm operably coupled to the elongate body, the robotic arm comprising: (i) an upper arm segment (360); (ii) a forearm segment (330) operably coupled to the upper arm segment (at elbow joint 234; paragraph 0145); and (iii) at least two actuable components (end effector instrument 239, 342, 344 and wrist assembly 236) associated with the robotic arm and operably coupled to the forearm segment (Figures 5A-5J); (c) a first cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a first actuator (332) disposed within the forearm segment (330, Figure 5J); and (ii) a first motive force transfer cable (332a) disposed through the forearm segment operably coupled to the first actuator (332) and a first of the at least two actuable components (Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraphs 0179); and (d) a second cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a second actuator (336) disposed within the forearm segment (330, Figure 5J); and (ii) a second motive force transfer cable (336a) operably coupled to the second actuator and a second of the at least two actuable components (Yeung discloses that the wrist drive 336a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraph 0175). Regarding claim 11, Yeung discloses (Figure 5K) a first gear-driven actuation assembly comprising: (a) a third actuator (339) disposed within the forearm segment (330, Figure 5J); and (b) at least one gear (339a) operably coupled to the third actuator and a third of the at least two actuable components (paragraph 0182). Regarding claim 14, Yeung discloses the first of the at least two actuable components comprises actuable end effector grasper arms (239, 342, 344; Figures 5D-5H), and wherein the second of the at least two actuable components comprises a rotatable end effector grasper body (346a). Regarding claim 15, Yeung discloses (Figures 5A-5J) that the first and second actuators (332, 336) are disposed within the forearm segment (330). Regarding claim 21, Yeung discloses (Figures 1-15D) a robotic device comprising: (a) an elongate body (210); (b) a robotic arm operably coupled to the elongate body, the robotic arm comprising: (i) an upper arm segment (360); (ii) a forearm segment (330) rotatably operably coupled to the upper arm segment at an elbow joint (234; Figure 5C; paragraph 0145); and (iii) an actuable component (239, 342, 344) associated with the robotic arm and operably coupled to the forearm segment (Figures 5D-5H); (c) a cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) an actuator (332) disposed within the forearm segment (330; Figure 5J); and (ii) a motive force transfer cable (332a) disposed through the forearm segment (330) operably coupled to the first-actuator (332) and the actuable component (Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraph 0179). Regarding claim 22, Yeung discloses (Figures 5A-5J) that the cable-driven actuation assembly is a first cable-driven actuation assembly, and further comprising: (d) a first gear-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a second actuator (336) disposed within the forearm; and (ii) at least one gear operably coupled to the second actuator and a second actuable component (paragraphs 0174-0175). Regarding claim 23, Yeung discloses (Figures 5A-5J) the cable-driven actuation assembly is a first cable-driven actuation assembly, and further comprising: (d) a second cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a second actuator (334) disposed within the forearm (330, Figure 5J); and (ii) a motive force transfer cable (334a) operably coupled to the second actuator (334) and the actuable component (Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 334a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraphs 0162-0163). Regarding claim 24, Yeung discloses (Figures 5A-5J) that the cable-driven actuation assembly is a first cable-driven actuation assembly, and further comprising: (d) a second cable-driven actuation assembly comprising: (i) a second actuator (334) disposed within the forearm (330, Figure 5J); and (ii) a rotary force transfer cable (334a) operably coupled to the second actuator (334) and the actuable component (Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 334a can comprise a wire and pulley assembly, paragraphs 0162-0163). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-4, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yeung et al. (US 2019/0321119 A1) (“Yeung”) in view of Burbank (US 2010/0016853 A1). Regarding claim 2, Yeung discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Yeung fails to explicitly disclose that the motive force transfer cable is a rotary force transfer cable. In the same field of endeavor, Burbank teaches (Figure 6) rotary force transfer cables (671, 672, 673, 674) that are wound/wrapped around pulleys and capstans. Burbank teaches that rotating the capstans causes pulling/release of a cable to control a function of an end effector (paragraphs 0055-0061). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the motive force transfer cable disclosed by Yeung to be a rotary force transfer cable, as taught by Burbank. Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a may comprise any mechanical configuration (such as wire and pulley; paragraph 0179). Burbank teaches that a rotary force transfer cable can be utilized in a mechanical configuration to convert rotation of a motor to actuation of an end effector (Burbank, paragraphs 0055-0061). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Yeung discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Yeung fails to explicitly disclose the motive force transfer cable is a lateral force transfer cable, wherein the lateral force transfer cable comprises a single lateral push/pull cable or two lateral pull cables. In the same field of endeavor, Burbank teaches (Figure 5) lateral force transfer cables (571, 572, 573, 574) that comprise single lateral push/pull cables or two lateral pull cables (paragraphs 0045-0051). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the motive force transfer cable disclosed by Yeung to be a lateral force transfer cable, wherein the lateral force transfer cable comprises a single lateral push/pull cable or two lateral pull cables, as taught by Burbank. Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a may comprise any mechanical configuration (paragraph 0179). Burbank teaches that a lateral force transfer cable can be utilized in a mechanical configuration to convert rotation of a motor to actuation of an end effector (Burbank, paragraphs 0045-0051). Regarding claim 12, Yeung discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Yeung fails to explicitly disclose that at least one of the first and second motive force transfer cables is a rotary force transfer cable. In the same field of endeavor, Burbank teaches (Figure 6) rotary force transfer cables (671, 672, 673, 674) that are wound/wrapped around pulleys and capstans. Burbank teaches that rotating the capstans causes pulling/release of a cable to control a function of an end effector (paragraphs 0055-0061). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify at least one of the first and second motive force transfer cables disclosed by Yeung to be a rotary force transfer cable, as taught by Burbank. Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a may comprise any mechanical configuration (such as wire and pulley; paragraph 0179). Burbank teaches that a rotary force transfer cable can be utilized in a mechanical configuration to convert rotation of a motor to actuation of an end effector (Burbank, paragraphs 0055-0061). Regarding claim 13, Yeung discloses the invention substantially as claimed. However, Yeung fails to explicitly disclose that at least one of the first and second motive force transfer cables is a lateral force transfer cable. In the same field of endeavor, Burbank teaches (Figure 5) lateral force transfer cables (571, 572, 573, 574; paragraphs 0045-0051). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify at least one of the first and second motive force transfer cables disclosed by Yeung to be a lateral force transfer cable, as taught by Burbank. Yeung discloses that the instrument drive 332a may comprise any mechanical configuration (paragraph 0179). Burbank teaches that a lateral force transfer cable can be utilized in a mechanical configuration to convert rotation of a motor to actuation of an end effector (Burbank, paragraphs 0045-0051). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-6, 10-15, and 21-24 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The Yeung reference is newly cited. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTIAN D KNAUSS whose telephone number is (571)272-8641. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 12:30-8:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 571-272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.D.K/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /DIANE D YABUT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765914
FLEXIBLE SURGICAL DEVICE WITH CONTROLLABLE STIFFNESS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12714600
NEW AND IMPROVED VITRECTOR AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING A ONE-STEP POSTERIOR VITRECTOMY USING THE SAME
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714457
ATHERECTOMY CATHETERS HAVING MOVABLE BEADS
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702401
Surgical Constructs for Tissue Fixation and Methods of Tissue Repairs
5y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702396
ARTICULATING SUTURING DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.9%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 429 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month