Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/065,277

PORTABLE AND VARIABLE DIRECTIONAL MOUNTING DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 13, 2022
Examiner
EPPS, TODD MICHAEL
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
704 granted / 967 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
§112
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a non-final Office Action for serial number 18/065,277, Portable And Variable Directional Mounting Device, Method And System, filed on December 13, 2022. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 5 which includes claims 1-11, 13, 14, 16, and 17. in the reply filed on January 27, 2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that all the figures and claims in the application provide mounting devices and have the same classification. This is not found persuasive because there are different embodiments and applicant can only choose one embodiment for this prosecution. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the centroid" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the plane" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the direction" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the traversing path" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the centroid" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 17 recites the limitation "the same general direction" in lines 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 13-14, 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Publication No. 2024/0183686 to Hedeen et al. (Hedeen). Regarding claim 1, Hedeen ‘686 disclsoes a device (10) comprising of a channel (hole), an actuator (18 inside) and a fastener (30). Regarding claim 2, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the channel traverse the centroid of the actuator. Regarding claim 3, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the actuator has a mounting surface (see Fig. 2 – (18) surface). Regarding claim 4, see 112 rejections above, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the plane of the mounting surface is parallel to the direction of the traversing path of the channel. Regarding claim 5, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the mounting surface is configured to accept a pinning mechanism. Regarding claim 6, Hedeen ‘686 discloses when the mounting surface is configured with a screw hole and the pinning mechanism is a screw. Regarding claim 13, Hedeen ‘686 discloses a system (82 of the magnetic section 18) comprising an actuator (88 – inside), at least one mounting surface (18 – surface in Fig. 6), fastener (138), and at least one pinning mechanism (142), wherein the actuator further comprises a channel (104), wherein the channel traversing the centroid of the actuator. Regarding claim 14, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the pinning mechanism is a screw (142). Regarding claim 16, Hedeen ‘686 discloses multiple channels (104, 106). Regarding claim 17, Hedeen ‘686 discloses wherein the multiple channels all traverse the same general direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hedeen ‘686 in view of U.S. Patent No. 10,663,089 to Sylvester. Hedeen ‘686 fails to disclose wherein the fastener is a thin flexible strap with notched surface and locking mechanism attached to one of the ends of the strap. Nevertheless, Sylvester ‘089 discloses a mounting bracket with several fasteners, each fastener is a thin flexible strap with a notched surface and a locking mechanism. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Hedeen ‘686 to include the mounting bracket with several fasteners (cable tie) because one would have motivation to provide holding means to hold multiple cables as taught by Sylvester ‘089. Claim(s) 8-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hedeen ‘686. Concerning method claim 8-11, in view of the structure discloses by Hedeen ‘686, the method for holding a planer object would have been obvious, since it is the normal and logical manner in which the device would be used. If a prior art device, in its normal and usual operation, would be necessarily perform the method claimed, then the method claimed will be considered to be anticipated by the prior art device. When the prior art device is the same as a device described in the specification for carrying out the claimed method, it can be assumed the device will perform the claimed process. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent No. 9,004,417 – fastening device with cable ties Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TODD M. EPPS whose telephone number is (571) 272-8282. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached on 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TODD M EPPS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632 April 4, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Jul 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Jul 30, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583545
A Rear Mirror Assembly With Anti-Rotation Protection
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584587
BRACKET, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HANGING ARTICLES UNDER A STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573828
WIRE STUB OUT CLIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564376
POSITIONING ARM APPARATUS FOR ULTRASOUND HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560277
DISPLAY MOUNTING SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month