Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/066,606

Method for Estimating the Time of Flight Between a First Equipment Item and a Second Equipment Item.

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 15, 2022
Examiner
NGUYEN, NAM V
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Orange
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
722 granted / 925 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
952
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 925 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The application of Surbayrole et al. for a “method for estimating the time of flight between a first equipment item and a second equipment item” filed on December 15, 2022 has been examined. This application claims foreign priority based on the application FR2113688, filed on December 16, 2021 in French. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C 119(a) – (d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claims 1-12 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schoenberg et al. (Pub. No. 2021/0072373). Referring to Claim 1, Schoenberg et al. disclose an estimation method for estimating a time of flight between a first equipment item (210) and a second equipment item (220) (page 1 paragraphs 0004 to 0006; see Figures 1 to 13), wherein the method is carried out by the first equipment item (210) and comprises: receiving from the second equipment item (220) a transmission information item (202) (i.e. ranging response from mobile device 220) representing a time interval between an instant of reception of a message (201) (i.e. a ranging request from mobile 210) from said first equipment item (210) and an instant of transmission by said second equipment item (220) of a message including said transmission information item (i.e. in response to receiving the ranging request 201, mobile device 220 can transmit ranging response 202. As shown, ranging response 202 is transmitted at time T3, e.g., a transmitted time of a pulse or an average transmission time for a set of pulses. T2 and T3 may also be a set of times for respective pulses. Ranging response 202 can include times T2 and T3 so that mobile device 210 can compute distance information. As an alternative, a delta between the two times (e.g., T3-T2) can be sent. The ranging response 202 can also include an identifier for the first mobile device 210, an identifier for the second mobile device 220, or both. At T4, the first mobile device 210 can receive ranging response 202. Like the other times, T4 can be a single time value or a set of time values) (page 3 paragraphs 0042 to 0043; page 4 paragraph 0059; see Figures 1 and 2), and estimating the time of flight between the first equipment item (210) and the second equipment item (220) by using the transmission information item (i.e. The response message can be received by the beacon 702 at time t.sub.3 714. The Round Trip Time (R1) 716 can be calculated as the elapsed time between the t.sub.0 706 and t.sub.3 714. In some embodiments, the device 704 can transmit include the reply time (D1) 712 as part of the information contained in the data packet sent to the beacon 702. The beacon 702 can calculate a time of flight (TOF) by subtracting the Reply Time (D1) 712 from the Round Trip Time (R1) 716. The beacon 702 can calculate a coarse range between the beacon 702 and the device 704 can be calculated by multiplying the TOF by the speed of light (c) or a fixed speed of 299, 794, 458 meters per second) (page 2 paragraph 0026; page 10 paragraph 0129; see Figures 2 and 7). Referring to Claim 2, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, furthermore including transmitting said estimated time of flight (i.e. the beacon 702 generates and transmits an acknowledgement message at time t.sub.5 718. The Reply Time (D2) can include the elapsed time between t.sub.5 718 and t.sub.3 714. The Reply Time (D2) can include the processing time to receive the response message, generate, and transmits the acknowledgement message. In some embodiments, the acknowledgement message can include the information such as the round trip time (R1) 716 and the Reply Time (D2) 720.) (page 10 paragraph 0130; see Figure 7). Referring to Claim 3, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, furthermore including transmitting a reception information item representative of an instant starting from which said first equipment item is configured in order to receive messages, the second equipment item taking this reception information item into account in order to determine the instant of transmission of the message including said transmission information item (i.e. The duration of each of the timeslots can also be specified in the broadcast message 610. By specifying a number and duration of each of the timeslots, the devices 604, 606 can select from a number of different defined time periods to conduct ranging to reduce the potential for missed messages from collisions between messages on the same channel. The parameters for a ranging round 608 can be communicated from the beacon 602 to the plurality of computing devices via the broadcast message 610. ) (page 8 paragraphs 0108 to 0110; see Figures 6 and 7). Referring to Claim 4, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 2, furthermore including transmitting a transmission information item representing a time interval between an instant of reception of a message received from the second equipment item and an instant of transmission of a message including said transmission information item (i.e. in response to receiving the ranging request 201, mobile device 220 can transmit ranging response 202. As shown, ranging response 202 is transmitted at time T3, e.g., a transmitted time of a pulse or an average transmission time for a set of pulses. T2 and T3 may also be a set of times for respective pulses. Ranging response 202 can include times T2 and T3 so that mobile device 210 can compute distance information. As an alternative, a delta between the two times (e.g., T3-T2) can be sent. The ranging response 202 can also include an identifier for the first mobile device 210, an identifier for the second mobile device 220, or both. At T4, the first mobile device 210 can receive ranging response 202. Like the other times, T4 can be a single time value or a set of time values) (page 3 paragraphs 0042 to 0043; page 4 paragraph 0059; see Figures 1 and 2). Referring to Claim 5, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, furthermore including receiving the time of flight between the first equipment item (702) and the second equipment item (704), estimated by the second equipment item (704) (i.e. the device 704 can receive the acknowledgement message containing the round trip time (R1) 716, the reply time (D1) 712, and reply time (D2) 720 to calculate a precise range between the beacon 702 and the device 704. The device 704 can calculate a time of flight (TOF) or a time difference by subtracting the reply time (D2) 720, from the round trip time (R2) 724.) (page 10 paragraph 0131; see Figure 7). Referring to Claim 6, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 5, furthermore including determining an average of a previously estimated time of flight and the estimated time of flight received from the second equipment item, the average determined being the time of flight (i.e. the process can be repeated to perform multiple measurements over a time interval as part of a ranging session, where such measurements can be averaged or otherwise analyzed to provide a single distance value, e.g., for each antenna) (page 3 paragraphs 0039-0042; see Figure 2). Referring to Claim 7, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, the first and the second equipment item respectively including application programming interfaces, wherein the method if carried out by at least one of the application programming interfaces of the first equipment item (i.e. The time period for conducting ranging between the beacon device and the multiple computing devices is a ranging round. The ranging round can be repeated one or more times based on requirements for an application executing on the devices) (page 7 paragraph 0102; see Figure 6). Referring to Claim 8, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, further comprising determining a distance between the first equipment item and the second equipment item using the estimated the time of flight (i.e. a mobile device can include ranging circuitry that can determine the relative distance between the mobile device and another mobile device. For example, time of flight measurements can be performed using ultra-wideband (UWB) pulses transmitted between the mobile devices) (page 2 paragraph 0026; page 3 paragraphs 0036-0037; see Figures 2, 3 and 7). Referring to Claim 9, Schoenberg et al. disclose the estimation method according to Claim 1, further comprising synchronizing the first equipment item and the second equipment item using the estimated the time of flight (i.e. The ranging wireless protocol and the another wireless protocol can be synchronized so that mobile device 220 can turn on the ranging antenna(s) and associated circuitry for a specified time window, as opposed to leaving them on for an entire ranging session) (page 3 paragraph 0041; page 4 paragraph 0057; see Figure 2). Referring to Claims 10-12, Schoenberg et al. disclose an estimation device and a non-transitory computer readable information medium, the claims 10-12 same in that the claims 1 and 2 already addressed above therefore claims 10-12 are also rejected for the same reasons given with respect to claims 1-2. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Refer to the enclosed PTO-892 for details. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NAM V NGUYEN whose telephone number is 571-272-3061. Fax number is (571) 273-3061. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00AM-5:00PM Monday to Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached on 571-272-3114. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned are 571-273-8300 for regular communications. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /NAM V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586429
FUSION SPLICING SYSTEM, OPERATION CONTROL METHOD FOR FUSION SPLICER, AND SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571234
Remote Lock and Key Transfer with Operation Time/User Identification Function
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12555429
ACCESS CONTROL DEVICE WITH GATEWAY OPERABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12555423
LOCK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND READING AND WRITING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12555465
Wireless Control Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 925 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month