Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/067,256

RESONANCE DEVICE, COLLECTIVE SUBSTRATE, AND RESONANCE DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 16, 2022
Priority
Aug 24, 2020 — JP 2020-140876 +1 more
Examiner
ROSENAU, DEREK JOHN
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
960 granted / 1240 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1267
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
81.1%
+41.1% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1240 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 9-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 31 March 2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of the invention of group I in the reply filed on 31 March 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tanaya (US 2007/0228891). With respect to claim 1, Tanaya discloses a resonance device (Figs 1, 2A, and 2B) comprising: a first substrate (item 54) including a resonator (item 55) having a vibrating portion (items 35 and 36), a holding portion (item 53) configured to hold the vibrating portion (Figs 2A and 2B), and an isolation groove (gap between vibrating portions 35/36 and holding portion 53) that surrounds the vibrating portion in a plan view of the resonance device (Figs 2A and 2B); and a second substrate (item 56) facing the first substrate with the resonator interposed therebetween (Fig 1) and that includes a first connection portion (items 37 and 38) electrically connected to the vibrating portion (Figs 2A and 2B, paragraph 94). With respect to claim 2, Tanaya discloses the resonance device according to Claim 1, further comprising: a joint portion (items 53, 37a, and 37b) jointing the first substrate to the second substrate and sealing a vibration space for the resonator (Figs 1, 2A, and 2B), the joint portion having conductivity and electrically connected to the first connection portion, and a second connection portion electrically connected to the joint portion and extending to outer edges of the resonator in the plan view (Paragraph 94, wherein the connection portion is electrically connected via extraction portions 37a and 38a). With respect to claim 3, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 2, wherein the second connection portion extends to the outer edges on a surface of the first substrate that faces the second substrate and on a surface of the second substrate that faces the first substrate (Figs 1, 2A and 2B). With respect to claim 4, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 2, wherein the isolation groove extends along an outer periphery of the joint portion in the plan view (Figs 2A and 2B, wherein the language of the claim does not specify whether the isolation groove must extend outward or inward of the outer periphery of the joint portion). With respect to claim 5, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 2, wherein the isolation groove extends along an inner periphery of the joint portion in the plan view (Figs 2A and 2B, rein the language of the claim does not specify whether the isolation groove must extend outward or inward of the inner periphery of the joint portion). With respect to claim 6, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 1, wherein the isolation groove is between outer edges of the resonator and the vibrating portion in the plan view (Figs 2A and 2B). With respect to claim 7, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 2, wherein the isolation groove is configured such that a conductive path from an outside of the resonator via the holding portion to the vibrating portion is interrupted by the isolation groove before the jointing by the joint portion (Figs 1, 2A and 2B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tanaka in view of Hirota et al. (US 2018/0034441). With respect to claim 8, Tanaka discloses the resonance device according to Claim 1. Tanaka does not disclose that the resonator further includes a degenerate silicon substrate. Hirota et al. teaches a piezoelectric resonance device in which the resonator further includes a degenerate silicon substrate (Paragraph 82). Before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the degenerate silicon of Hirota et al. with the piezoelectric resonance device of Tanaka for the benefit of improving temperature characteristics (Paragraph 82 of Hirota et al.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Derek John Rosenau whose telephone number is (571)272-8932. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7 am to 5:30 pm Central Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at (571) 270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DEREK J ROSENAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2022
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640703
ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE WITH DIELECTRIC LAYER FOR REDUCED TRANSVERSE LEAKAGE
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640704
PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635413
DRIVING OF PIEZOELECTRICS FOR MEMS-BASED COOLING SYSTEMS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629969
PIEZOELECTRIC DIRECT CURRENT GENERATOR
3y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633894
ELASTIC WAVE DEVICE, MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1240 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month