Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/067,784

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING LOCAL ASSISTANCE TO A CALLER WHOSE LOCATION IS UNKNOWN

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 19, 2022
Examiner
GHULAMALI, QUTBUDDIN
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Motorola Solutions Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
911 granted / 1071 resolved
+23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1092
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1071 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to amendment filed February 09, 2026. Response to Remarks Applicant's remarks filed 10/10/2025, have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicants remarks that reference Velusamy fails to disclose receiving a list of devices from the calling device, the list of devices proximate to the calling device whose location is unknown, recited in claim 1. The examiner respectfully disagrees. As recited and as best understood, device 109 (fig. 1) is a calling device, the device 109 having received and stored a list of calling devices, that are proximate to the calling device and transmitted (made available) to the one or more user devices, e.g., mobile device 101b (fig. 1). That is, Velusamy discloses, the recited limitation, receiving a list of devices from the calling device of those proximate to the calling device whose location is unknow. Regarding claim 6, Velusamy discloses calling device, device 109, fig. 1, sending a list of devices proximate to the calling device to PSAP answering point, wherein the public safety answering point identifies a device within the list of devices that is associated with a user that has volunteered to provide local assistance (users who may be willing to participate in this service are trained medical personnel, police officers, fire fighters, volunteers, etc. With this emergency notification service, an off-duty officer, for example, may be able to reach the person in distress much more rapidly than emergency responders because the officer is nearby) (paras. 0019, 0042, 0043). Applicant’s attempt to overcome the rejection is not persuasive the rejection has been maintained. Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers or page numbers and sections in the reference as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in its entirety as potentially teaching of all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Velusamy et al (hereinafter Velusamy) (US 2011/051829). Regarding claims 1, 11, Velusamy discloses a method (system) of providing local assistance to a caller comprising: receiving, at a public safety answering point, a request for assistance from a caller whose location is unknown, the request for assistance received from a calling device (PSAP (107) receiving an emergency call (trigger retrieval of a user profile of the caller) for assistance … users who may be complete strangers) (paras. 0048, 0049); receiving a list of devices proximate to the calling device from the calling device whose location is unknown (the platform 109 can retrieve a list of registered devices within a certain proximity of the mobile device 101a and compute the distances to these registered devices. The location information may be derived from GPS data and/or addressing information (e.g., street address) stored in database 119. The notification message is then transmitted to the one or more registered user devices, e.g., mobile device 101b) (paras. 0043, 0044); identifying when a device in the list of devices proximate to the calling device has been registered as belonging to a person willing to provide local assistance (if the caller has not specified a list of registered devices, the platform 109 identifies all users within the proximity threshold. ….. if a list of registered user devices is associated with the caller, then the platform 109 determines the distances from the location of the caller to each of the registered user devices, per step 405) (paras. 0049, 0050); and sending a request to the identified device to provide local assistance to the caller whose location is unknown (emergency notification 109, fig. 1., sends the notification message to one or more of the registered user devices … e.g., such people may include a neighbor, a family member, a friend, or even a stranger, may be able to help even before the emergency responders arrive, ….. according to certain embodiments, disseminates an alert about the caller to users within a predetermined proximity so they can attempt to help the caller.) (paras. 0015, 0050). Further discloses a processor (203) and a memory (205) coupled to the processor (para. 0033; fig. 2A). Regarding claims 2, 7, 12, Velusamy discloses sending an indication to the calling device associated with the caller whose location is unknown to download a helper application, wherein the helper application collects the list of devices proximate to the calling device via a wireless connection (platform 109 may provide a user interface, e.g., web portal or other networked application, to permit user to access the features and functionality of platform 109 via devices 101a-101e) (para. 0034); and receiving, at the public safety answering point, from the helper application, the list of devices proximate to the calling device (the platform 109 can retrieve a list of registered devices within a certain proximity of the mobile device 101a and compute the distances to these registered devices. The location information may be derived from GPS data and/or addressing information (e.g., street address) stored in database 119. The notification message is then transmitted to the one or more registered user devices, e.g., mobile device 101b) (paras. 0038, 0043, 0044). Regarding claims 3, 8, 13, Velusamy discloses receiving, at the public safety answering point, the list of devices proximate to the calling device from an application integrated with the calling device (Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) 107 operates in conjunction with an emergency notification platform 109 to provide a notification capability. The platform 109 can determine which devices are within a predetermined proximity to a calling device, and issue an alert to these devices. A database 111 is maintained store information about which devices are participating in the emergency notification service, the platform 109 can retrieve a list of registered devices within a certain proximity of the mobile device 101a) (para. 0019, 0043, 0044). Regarding claims 4, 9, 14, Velusamy discloses wherein the list of devices proximate to the calling device further comprises a list of Bluetooth identifiers, wherein identifying when a device in the list of devices proximate to the calling device has been registered as belonging to a person willing to provide local assistance (if the caller has not specified a list of registered devices, the platform 109 identifies all users within the proximity threshold. ….. if a list of registered user devices is associated with the caller, then the platform 109 determines the distances from the location of the caller to each of the registered user devices) (paras. 0049, 0050) further comprises: determining if the Bluetooth identifier (alert) is included in a list of people registered as willing to provide local assistance, wherein registration includes providing the Bluetooth identifier of the device (if the caller has not specified a list of registered devices, the platform 109 identifies all users within the proximity threshold. ….. if a list of registered user devices is associated with the caller, then the platform 109 determines the distances from the location of the caller to each of the registered user devices, the wireless network 103 includes an anchoring service that can identify the location of the caller and, based on that information, locate a local 911 operator to handle the call. After communicating with the platform 109, can directly broadcast a help request to the neighboring devices in the vicinity. In certain embodiments, an alert can be forwarded to a user device via BLUETOOTH or WIFI. ) (paras. 0026, 0031, 0049, 0050) Regarding claims 5, 15, Velusamy discloses determining that there is no device in the list of devices proximate to the calling device that has been registered as belonging to a person willing to provide local assistance (the switch can communicate with the emergency notification platform 109 to recognize the caller, and to look up the possible recipients, who may be in the vicinity of the caller, of an emergency notification message, …. the alert can be sent to one or more registered devices of the recipient, as well as multiple recipients) (para. 0030); sending a request to the calling device to solicit contact information for devices proximate to the calling device (emergency notification 109, fig. 1., sends the notification message to one or more of the registered user devices … e.g., such people may include a neighbor, a family member, a friend, or even a stranger, may be able to help even before the emergency responders arrive) (para. 0015, 0050); receiving contact information for devices proximate to the calling device (call received at the PSAP 107, allows retrieval of a user profile of the caller, providing a proximity threshold value determination) (para. 0049); and contacting a device proximate to the calling device using the contact information to request a user of the contacted device to provide local assistance to the caller whose location is unknown (platform (109), fig. 1., sends the notification message to one or more of the registered user devices (step 409). In one embodiment, if no device satisfies the threshold, …… (109) may designate a default registered user device (i.e., closest one) to receive the notification transmission) (para. 0050). Regarding claim 6, Velusamy discloses a method for requesting local assistance comprising: calling, with a calling device whose location cannot be determined, a public safety answering point to request local assistance (identification and location of the calling party to be determined in order to provide a service, Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) (element 107) operates in conjunction with an emergency notification platform 109 to provide a notification capability) (paras. 0014, 0019); identifying devices proximate to the calling device and adding the devices to a list of devices proximate to the calling device (if the caller has not specified a list of registered devices, the platform (device109) identifies all users within the proximity threshold. ….. if a list of registered user devices is associated with the caller, then the platform 109 determines the distances from the location of the caller to each of the registered user devices. For mobile devices, identifying the nearest PSAP for the caller can be enhanced by including (adding) geographical or spatial information (for determining local information) in the telephone call set-up as well) (paras. 0017, 0049, 0050); and sending, from the calling device (device 109, fig. 1), the list of devices proximate to the calling device to the public safety answering point (PSAP), wherein the public safety answering point identifies a device within the list of devices that is associated with a user that has volunteered to provide local assistance (users who may be willing to participate in this service are trained medical personnel, police officers, fire fighters, volunteers, etc. With this emergency notification service, an off-duty officer, for example, may be able to reach the person in distress much more rapidly than emergency responders because the officer is nearby) (paras. 0019, 0042, 0043). Regarding claim 10, Velusamy discloses receiving a request to collect contact information from the list of devices proximate to the calling device (Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) (107) operates in conjunction with an emergency notification platform (109) to provide a notification capability. The platform 109 can determine which devices are within a predetermined proximity to a calling device, and issue an alert to these devices. A database (111) is maintained store information about which devices are participating in the emergency notification service, the platform (109) can retrieve a list of registered devices within a certain proximity of the mobile device 101a) (para. 0019, 0043, 0044); requesting contact information for each device within the list of devices proximate to the calling device (call received at the PSAP (107), allows retrieval of a user profile of the caller, providing a proximity threshold value determination) (para. 0049); and sending the contact information for each device within the list of devices proximate to the calling device to the public safety answering point (if the caller has not specified a list of registered devices, the platform (109) identifies all users within the proximity threshold. ….. if a list of registered user devices is associated with the caller, then the platform 109 determines the distances from the location of the caller to each of the registered user devices) (paras. 0049, 0050). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUTBUDDIN GHULAMALI whose telephone number is (571) 272-3014. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am to 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUTBUDDIN GHULAMALI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 09, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598538
UNIFIED ACCESS CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596168
INDOOR-OUTDOOR DETECTION BY SMARTPHONE WITHOUT USING GPS INFORMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598445
APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING MEDIA SERVER USING MOBILE APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593305
METHODS, APPARATUSES, SYSTEM AND PRODUCT FOR POSITIONING DETERMINATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593262
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TERMINAL TO ACCESS NETWORK, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1071 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month