Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/067,860

SOFT MAGNETIC COMPOSITION, SINTERED BODY, COMPOSITE BODY, PASTE, COIL COMPONENT, AND ANTENNA

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 19, 2022
Examiner
KOSLOW, CAROL M
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1775 granted / 2171 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
2217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2171 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The disclosed formula for the W-type hexagonal ferrite on page 5 is incorrect. The correct formula for W-type hexagonal ferrites is AMe2Fe16O27, wherein A is at least one divalent metal of Ba, Ca, Sr and Pb; Me is at least one of divalent metal selected from Fe, Co, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn, Cu and Cr. In addition, the specification teaches the W-type hexagonal ferrite has the compositional formula ACaMe2Fe16O27, which limits the amounts of each element in the ferrite to a single amount, and then defines the ferrite in terms of amount ranges. The specification also teaches there is a charge balance variable D and M2d, but these variables are not in the given compositional formula. It is unclear what is the individual amounts of Hf, Zr, Nb and Ta since the specification only teaches the total amount of Zr and Hf and the total amount of Nb and Ta. It is unclear to which variable or where in the disclosed formula the taught aluminum and gallium belong. It is noted that paragraph [0271]-[0275] teaches Al and Ga partially substitute for Fe, but this is not reflected in the teachings on pages 5-6. The teachings in paragraphs [0158] and [0319] that the amount of calcium is outside the amount for the structural formula and it is present in the grain boundary of the ferrite, the A site for W-type hexagonal ferrites of AMe2Fe16O27 and partially substitutes for Fe in W-type hexagonal ferrites of AMe2Fe16O27. This indicates that the taught ferrite has the disclosed general formula ACaxMey(Fe2m-zM(2d)z)O27-δ, as taught in the examples, and the taught ferrite has W-type hexagonal ferrite as the main phase of the ferrite. This is different from the disclosure on pages 5 and 6. Finally, it is unclear what materials are encompassed by “nonmagnetic body”, besides the glass and resin taught in paragraph [0308]. It is also unclear if the dispersing component of the taught paste would be considered as a “nonmagnetic body”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. This claim teaches a sintered body comprising the fired result of the composition of claim 1. The specification teaches, for example in paragraph [0059], a sintered body obtained by firing the composition of claim 1. The sintered body taught in the specification is different from that claimed in that the body of the specification consists of the composition of claim 1, while that claimed can contain other materials besides the composition of claim 1. This discrepancy between what is claimed and what is taught in the specification needs to be corrected. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are so indefinite so as to preclude a reasonable search of the prior art by the examiner. The claimed formula for the W-type hexagonal ferrite is incorrect. In addition, the claims teach the W-type hexagonal ferrite has the compositional formula ACaMe2Fe16O27, which limits the amounts of each element in the ferrite to a single amount, and then defines the ferrite in terms of amount ranges. The claims also teaches there is a charge balance variable D and M2d, but these variables are not in the given compositional formula. It is unclear what is the individual amounts of Hf, Zr, Nb and Ta since the claims only teach the total amount of Zr and Hf and the total amount of Nb and Ta. Finally, it is unclear to which variable or where in the claimed formula the claimed aluminum and gallium belong. Claim 9 is indefinite as to what is meant by “a fired result of the …composition according to claim 1”. This wording is unconventional. Usually, claimed to a sintered body are written as “A sintered body comprising the composition of claim 1” or in using similar language. Claims 10 and 11 are indefinite as to what materials applicants consider as “a non- magnetic body”. Claims 12 and 13 recite the limitation "the sintered body according to claim 6". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims or in claim 6. It is noted that it is clear 9 that teaches a sintered body, not claim 6. Conclusion WO 2020/162295 is cited as of interest since it teaches a soft magnetic composition having the same composition as that claimed in this application. Since WO 2020/162295 has the same inventor and assignee as this application and was published less than 1 year before the effective filing date of this application, which is 8/5/2021l, it is not prior art under the 35 USC 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) exceptions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. MELISSA KOSLOW whose telephone number is (571)272-1371. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues:7:45-3:45 EST;Thurs-Fri:6:30-2:00EST; and Wed:7:45-2:00EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C Melissa Koslow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734 cmk 9/18/25
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600907
SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOT STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595412
CERAMIC COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CERAMIC COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593609
Thermoelectric Nanocomposite Materials
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586701
COMPLEX MAGNETIC COMPOSITION, MAGNETIC MEMBER, AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577166
Manganese-zinc Ferrite with High Magnetic Permeability at Negative Temperature and Low Loss at High Temperature and Method for Preparing Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 2171 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month