Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/068,534

SIMULATED COLLABORATION OF MULTIPLE CONTROLLERS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 20, 2022
Priority
Jun 23, 2020 — provisional 63/042,566 +1 more
Examiner
YOUNG, TIFFANY P
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
270 granted / 339 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
362
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 339 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims This Office Action is in response to the application filed on December 20, 2022. Claims 1-20 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) were submitted on January 27, 2023, September 8, 2023, June 7, 2024, September 20, 2024, May 14, 2025, and September 22, 2025. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Priority Request for priority to Provisional App. No. 63/042,566 dated June 23, 2020 is acknowledged. Examiner notes Applicant may be requested to perfect one or more of the claims in the situation where applied prior art has priority falling between the filing date of the non-provisional application the date of the provisional application. No action by Applicant is requested at this time. Additionally, Applicant’s request for priority to PCT/JP2021/008011 dated March 2, 2021 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 4, 10-14, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0249663 (hereinafter, “Liu”). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses A simulation device (see at least [0046] and the publication generally; the digital model) comprising circuitry configured to: execute a first simulation of a first control of a first machine, wherein the first control is executed by a first controller (see at least [0010], [0019], and [0044]-[0045]; any one of the special devices may be considered the first machine with a first PLC facilitating digital twinning of the first machine and corresponding virtual model); execute a second simulation of a second control of a second machine, wherein the second control is executed by a second controller so that the second machine operates in collaboration with the first machine (see at least [0010], [0019], and [0044]-[0045]; any one of the special devices may be considered the second machine with another PLC facilitating digital twinning of the second machine and corresponding virtual model); and control progress of the first simulation and progress of the second simulation to maintain a simulated ratio of a progress speed of the first simulation and a progress speed of the second simulation to be equal to a ratio of a progress speed of the first control and a progress speed of the second control (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under essentially the same reasoning as claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses a PLC system which necessarily includes a non-transitory computer readable medium or equivalent; see at least Liu at [0010]. Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the first control includes first set of cycles (see at least [0044]-[0046]; control processes (i.e., cycles) for the first machine are monitored and synchronized), wherein the second control includes second set of cycles (see at least [0044]-[0046]; control processes (i.e., cycles) for the second machine are monitored and synchronized), and wherein the circuitry is configured to control an execution timing of each of the first set of cycles in the first simulation and an execution timing of each of the second set of cycles in the second simulation to maintain the simulated ratio to be equal to the ratio (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Regarding claim, 3 discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the first controller is configured to execute each of the first set of cycles after a first control period (see at least [0019]; each set of cycles is executed responsive to a previous control concluding through the line), wherein the second controller is configured to execute each of the second set of cycles after a second control period (see at least [0019]; each set of cycles is executed responsive to a previous control concluding through the line), wherein the circuitry is configured to: execute each of the first set of cycles without waiting for a completion of the first control period in the first simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; the simulation occurs simultaneously rather than after); execute each of the second set of cycles without waiting for a completion of the second control period in the second simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; the simulation occurs simultaneously rather than after); control the execution timing of each of the first set of cycles in the first simulation and the execution timing of each of the second set of cycles in the second simulation to maintain the simulated ratio to be equal to the ratio based on the first control period and the second control period (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Regarding claim 5, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is further configured to simulate an operation of the first machine and an operation of the second machine based on a result of the first simulation and a result of the second simulation (see at least [0021]; the process is iterative and new simulations are based on past results). Regarding claim 6, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 5. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to simulate the operation of the first machine and the operation of the second machine in response to determining that both the result of the first simulation and the result of the second simulation are updated (see at least [0021]; the process is iterative and new simulations are based on past results). Regarding claim 7, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is further configured to simulate communication executed between the first controller and the second controller during execution of the first simulation and the second simulation (see at least [0010], [0019], and [0044]-[0045]; communication between the different devices is facilitated during the simulation and synchronization processes). Regarding claim 8, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 7. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to: generate communication data for the communication by executing at least a part of the first simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning); and acquire the generated communication data after a lapse of a predetermined virtual delay time to execute at least a part of the second simulation based on the acquired communication data (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning. Examiner notes that these limitations are necessary for the synchronization). Regarding claim 9, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 8. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is further configured to: store, in a communication buffer, communication data generated by executing at least the part of the first simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning. Examiner notes that this step is needed for synchronization); count a number of communication cycles after the communication data is stored in the communication buffer (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning Examiner notes that this step is needed for synchronization); and acquire, in response to determining that the number of communication cycles becomes a number corresponding to the virtual delay time, the stored communication data to execute at least the part of the second simulation based on the acquired communication data (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning Examiner notes that this step is needed for synchronization). Regarding claim 15, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to, in response to receiving a designation of individual simulation, execute the first simulation regardless of the progress of the second simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Regarding claim 16, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 8. Additionally, Liu discloses A control system comprising: the simulation device according to claim 8; and the first controller and the second controller, wherein the circuitry is further configured to set the virtual delay time to correspond to a communication delay time between the first controller and the second controller (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Regarding claim 18, Liu discloses all of the limitations of claim 1. Additionally, Liu discloses A control system comprising: the simulation device according to claim 1 (see at least the citations above pertaining to claim 1); and the first controller and the second controller, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate a comparison image that compares the progress speed of the first control, the progress speed of the second control, the progress speed of the first simulation, and the progress speed of the second simulation (see at least [0044]-[0046]; synchronization between the first machine and first simulation, second machine and second simulation, and relationship therebetween is maintained in order to facilitate digital twinning). Allowable Subject Matter Each of claims 4, 10-14, and 17 is objected to as depending from a rejected claim but would be allowable if re-written in independent form including all intervening claims. Examiner will provide specific reasons for allowability when one or more claims is found to be in a state of allowance. Additional Relevant Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure and may be found on the accompanying PTO-892 Notice of References Cited: 12,216,460 which pertains to simulating an automation system via digital twins. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIFFANY P YOUNG whose telephone number is (313)446-6575. The examiner can normally be reached M-R 6:30 AM- 4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helal Algahaim can be reached at (571) 270-5227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TIFFANY YOUNG Primary Examiner Art Unit 3666 /TIFFANY P YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3666
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 18, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637112
Systems and Methods for Generating Synthetic Motion Predictions
1y 12m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626589
Systems and Methods for Simulating Traffic Scenes
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626389
PRECISE POSITIONING SYSTEM FOR INDOOR GPS AND RF COMPROMISED ENVIRONMENT MAPPING
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12619241
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ZERO-SHOT OBJECT NAVIGATION USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617516
CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 339 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month