Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/069,393

Surgical Navigation System And Method

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Examiner
CHANG, OLIVIA C
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Stryker Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
612 granted / 726 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 726 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is in response to the amendment filed October 23, 2025. As directed by the amendment, claim 1 has been amended and claims 4-20 were previously withdrawn. As such, claims 1-3 remain under consideration in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lang (US 2017/0258526). Regarding claim 1, Lang discloses a head-mounted display (OHMD) for use with a surgical navigation system including a patient tracker and a surgical instrument tracker (¶1561), the surgical navigation system configured to plan a target trajectory axis based on patient data and for the alignment of an instrument axis that is at least partially defined by a tip of a surgical instrument with the target trajectory axis (¶1561), said head-mounted display comprising: a lens (¶102); and wherein the head-mounted display is further configured to display an augmented reality angular alignment visualization comprising a deviation angle which represent the angle between a first angular vector representative of the instrument axis and a second angular vector representative of the target trajectory axis (¶1561). Regarding claim 2, Lang discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the deviation angle is configured to be scaled to allow the user to see small deviations in the angle between the first angular vector and the second angular vector (¶646). Regarding claim 3, Lang discloses the system of claim 1, wherein the augmented reality angular alignment visualization comprises a decomposition of the angle between a first angular vector representative of the instrument axis and a second angular vector representative of the target trajectory axis of the angle into two deviation angles (¶1561). Response to Arguments In response to Applicant's argument that Lang fails to teach “wherein the head-mounted display is further configured to display an augmented reality angular alignment visualization comprising a deviation angle which represent the angle between a first angular vector representative of the instrument axis and a second angular vector representative of the target trajectory axis”, Examiner respectfully disagrees. The claim requires the head-mounted display to display a “visualization comprising a deviation angle”. The deviation angle is inherently present between the target trajectory axis and the instrument axis, which can be viewed by the operator. The claim does not require the head-mounted display to display, for example, a numerical figure as the angle. Therefore, the invention of Lang meets the claim. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLIVIA C CHANG whose telephone number is (571) 270-5017. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30AM-5:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, KEVIN TRUONG, at (571) 272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571 -273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLIVIA C CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 15, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582419
TIBIAL SUPRAPATELLAR ENTRY PORTAL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558135
OSSEOUS ANCHORING IMPLANT WITH CORTICAL STABILIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12514623
ORTHOPEDIC PLATE FOR TREATMENT OF TIBIAL FRACTURES AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12514624
BONE FIXATION DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12491014
OSTEOSYNTHESIS PLATE SUITABLE AS A REPLACEMENT OF A SYNARTHROSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 726 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month