Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/069,703

ENERGY EFFICIENT DATA TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Examiner
BARRY, LANCE LEONARD
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
344 granted / 409 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
432
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 409 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 5 and 13 depends from claims that have been cancelled. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Appropriate amendment to the description to provide clear support or antecedent basis for “a bandwidth percentage queue fill per hash” and a “percentage queue fill per hash” of claims 5 and 13 is required, provided no new matter is introduced. Rejoinder Claims 1 and 9 are allowable. Claims 6 and 14, previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction/an election of species requirement, require all the limitations of an allowable claim. Pursuant to the procedures set forth in MPEP § 821.04(a), the requirement is hereby withdrawn and the latter claim(s) is/are hereby rejoined and fully examined for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104. In view of the withdrawal of the requirement, the applicant(s) is/are advised that if any claim presented in a continuation or divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once the requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 6-11, 14, 15, 16-20, 22, and 23 are allowed. Reasons for Allowance The examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance follows. These reasons for allowance should not be interpreted to imply that limitations not specifically mentioned are immaterial to patentability. Claims 1-3, 6-11, 14, 15, 16-20, 22, and 23 are allowable in light of the amendments and arguments of June 9, 2026. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Other Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to the instant disclosure. For example, US 20080298236 discloses dynamic link aggregation in a communications network. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lance Leonard Barry whose telephone number is (571)272-5856. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 700-430 ET 730-1630. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to email the Examiner. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached on 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LANCE LEONARD BARRY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457 41
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 21 earlier events
Jan 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704823
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING DATA FROM AN INTERNAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT TO AN EXTERNAL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12671622
ADAPTIVE NETWORK TRACE ANALYSIS USING REFERENCE COMMUNICATION FLOWS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12647491
Handling Discovery Requests in a Network
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641161
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME REPOSITORY MANAGEMENT FOR UNIVERSAL SERVICE DEPLOYMENT
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634374
TRAFFIC INFLUENCE FOR INITIAL EAS SELECTION
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 409 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month