Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/070,436

ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Nov 28, 2022
Examiner
GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Innolux Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

61%
Career Allow Rate
404 granted / 666 resolved
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
66 pending
732
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.2%
-0.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it contains phrases which can be implied “is provided by the present disclosure” (line 1). A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 are is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2020/0205681 to Putila et al. (Putila). In reference to at least claim 1 Putila discloses an electronic device (e.g. device shown in Figs. 3), comprising: a patterned substrate (e.g. substrate 300, 400, Figs. 304) having a plurality of main portions (e.g. main portions that include components are on the substrate, Fig. 4 and further discloses “patterns such as graphics, colours and/or decorations may be provided (402) on the substrate. The patterns may serve for a decorative purpose or have a technical character such as serving as an indicator related to a function of the heart activity sensor.”, para. [0048]) and a plurality of connecting portions (e.g. signal lines on the substrate, Fig. 4 and further discloses “patterns such as graphics, colours and/or decorations may be provided (402) on the substrate. The patterns may serve for a decorative purpose or have a technical character such as serving as an indicator related to a function of the heart activity sensor.”, para. [0048]), wherein at least one of the plurality of connecting portions connects two adjacent ones of the plurality of main portions (e.g. signal lines may connect adjacent components, Figs. 3-5); a plurality of biosensors disposed corresponding to the plurality of main portions (e.g. biosensors include LEDs 302 and photosensor(s) 304, Figs. 3-5); a conductive line disposed on the at least one of the plurality of connecting portions and electrically connecting two adjacent ones of the plurality of biosensors (e.g. signal lines 306, Figs. 3-5, “The signal lines may be provided by using various techniques, e.g. copper lines, printing and/or application of conductive adhesive and/or conductive ink, flexible printed circuit board(s), or laser direct structuring. Combinations of such techniques may also be employed. For example, some of the signal lines may be printed on the substrate and further signal lines or connections between the signal lines may be added thereafter by applying drops of conductive ink and/or adhesive. “, para. [0049]); and an insulating layer disposed on the plurality of biosensors and the conductive line (e.g. thermoplastic overmold 308 over signal lines, photosensor and LEDs, Figs. 3-5, “an overmold 308 of thermoplastic material covering the at least one LED 302, the at least one photo sensor 304 and a space between the at least one light emitting diode and the at least one photodiode.”, para. [0042]-[0044]). In reference to at least claim 2 Putila discloses a further comprising a plurality of insulating patterns disposed on the plurality of biosensors respectively, wherein two adjacent ones of the plurality of insulating patterns are spaced apart by a gap overlapping one of the plurality of connecting portions (e.g. “the overmold 308 may cover the signal lines 306 only partially and leave a part of the signal lines exposed such that the signal lines 306 may be coupled to electronics external to the overmold.”, therefore a gap is present over portions of the signal lines, para. [0068]). In reference to at least claim 3 Putila discloses a supporting substrate disposed under the patterned substrate (e.g. “the wearable device is comprised or configured to be coupled with a garment or garments (or apparel). Examples of such garments may include bra(s), swimming apparel, such as swimming suit or cap, and glove(s). The garment or apparel may be worn by the user. In some embodiments, the wearable device is integrated as a part of the garment or apparel”, therefore it has a supporting substrate, para. [0033]). In reference to at least claim 4 Putila discloses wherein the conductive line has a plurality of openings (e.g. through hole “openings” to connect to an electrode, Fig. 5, para. [0063]). In reference to at least claim 5 Putila discloses wherein the plurality of biosensors and the conductive line are disposed on a same side of the patterned substrate (e.g. signal lines, photo sensor and LEDs are on a same side of the substrate, Figs. 3-5). In reference to at least claim 6 Putila discloses wherein the plurality of biosensors comprises a plurality of light emitting units and a plurality of photo sensors, the plurality of light emitting units are respectively disposed corresponding to the plurality of main portions and configured to emit alight, and the plurality of photo sensors are configured to sense the light (e.g. “at least one photo sensor 304 arranged on the substrate 300 as spatially separated from the at least one LED 302 and arranged to absorb light through the substrate,”, para. [0042]). Claim(s) 1 and 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2023/0019482 to Lee et al. (Lee). In reference to at least claim 1 Lee discloses an electronic device (e.g. 100), comprising: a patterned substrate (e.g. substrate 110 has a pattern, Fig. 6-7) having a plurality of main portions (e.g. substrate 110 has larger portions “main portions”, Figs. 6-7) and a plurality of connecting portions (e.g. substrate 110 has portions that connect “connecting portions”, Figs. 6-7), wherein at least one of the plurality of connecting portions connects two adjacent ones of the plurality of main portions (e.g. substrate 110 has portions that connect “connecting portions” including portions that connect two “main portions”, Figs. 6-7); a plurality of biosensors disposed corresponding to the plurality of main portions (e.g. unit device 130 and pixel circuits 120); a conductive line disposed on the at least one of the plurality of connecting portions and electrically connecting two adjacent ones of the plurality of biosensors (e.g. connecting wire 140, Figs. 1,6); and an insulating layer disposed on the plurality of biosensors and the conductive line (e.g. “stretchable insulator”, para. [0121]). In reference to at least claim 5 Lee discloses wherein the plurality of biosensors and the conductive line are disposed on a same side of the patterned substrate (e.g. connecting wire 140, unit device 130 and pixel circuits 120 are on a same side of the device, Figs. 1,6). In reference to at least claim 6 Lee discloses wherein the plurality of biosensors comprises a plurality of light emitting units and a plurality of photo sensors, the plurality of light emitting units are respectively disposed corresponding to the plurality of main portions and configured to emit alight, and the plurality of photo sensors are configured to sense the light (e.g. “Each unit device of the plurality of unit devices may include a light emitting diode, photoelectric conversion diode, or any combination thereof.”, para. [0023], [0125], [0127], [0135]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2020/0205681 to Putila et al. (Putila) in view of US 2019/0012510 to Xu et al. (Xu). In reference to at least claim 7 Putila teaches a device according to claim 6. However, Putila does not explicitly teach a light shielding layer disposed on the plurality of biosensors and having a plurality of through holes overlapped with the plurality of biosensors respectively. Xu teaches an optical finger detection device which discloses a plurality of light emitting units (e.g. piezoluminescent layer 70) and photo sensors (e.g. sensing layer 40) which together are the “biosensors” and the use of a light shielding layer disposed on the plurality of biosensors and having a plurality of through holes overlapped with the plurality of biosensors respectively (e.g. patterned shield layer 50) to block light emitted from the piezoluminescent layer from directly going into the optical sensing layer (e.g. “The patterned light shield layer 50 is arranged between the optical sensing layer 40 and the piezoluminescent layer 70, and is configured to block the light emitted from the piezoluminescent layer 70 from directly going into the optical sensing layer 40.”, para. [0038]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Putila to include a light shielding layer disposed on the plurality of biosensors and having a plurality of through holes overlapped with the plurality of biosensors, as taught by Xu, in order to block the light emitted from the light emitting units from directly going into the photosensors. (‘510, para. [0038]). In reference to at least claim 8 Putila teaches a device according to claim 1. However, Putila does not explicitly teach the plurality of biosensors comprise piezoelectric materials. Xu teaches an optical finger detection device which discloses a plurality of light emitting units (e.g. piezoluminescent layer 70) and photo sensors (e.g. sensing layer 40) and the using a piezoluminescent layer as the light emitting units “biosensors” (e.g. piezoluminescent layer 70) in which “the piezoluminescent layer emits no light when a pressure subjected by the piezoluminescent layer is less than a threshold value, and emits light when the pressure is greater than the threshold value.” (e.g. “The piezoluminescent layer 70 is arranged under the cover plate 60, and has a changed state of light emission when subjected to a pressure, to emit light of a certain wavelength”, para. [0011], [0038], [0041]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Putila to include the plurality of biosensors comprising piezoelectric materials such as a piezoluminescent layer, as taught by Xu, in order to allow the light emitting units to change based on a certain pressure threshold value reducing power consumption and cost of the device (‘510, para. [0051], [0082]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2013/0296664 to Frey et al. which teaches a biosensor and method for providing a biosensor. US 2019/0117083 to Wang et al. which teaches a flexible epidermal multimodal health monitor. US 2020/0006413 to Hattori which teaches a photelectric conversion device. US 2022/0117503 to Wang et al. which teaches an integrated chemical/ultrasonic transducer sensor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER L GHAND whose telephone number is (571)270-5844. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30AM - 3:30PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JENNIFER MCDONALD can be reached at (571)270-3061. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER L GHAND/Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 08, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12594429
STIMULATION PROGRAMMING AND CONTROL BASED ON PATIENT AMBULATORY VELOCITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12564710
SYSTEM FOR SECURING A RELEASABLE CONNECTION BETWEEN TWO ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12539429
AUTONOMOUS IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE TUNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533515
COCHLEAR STIMULATION SYSTEM WITH SURROUND SOUND AND NOISE CANCELLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12521038
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AND TREATING HEART FAILURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+24.1%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 666 resolved cases by this examiner