Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/070,438

Training Spoon

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 28, 2022
Examiner
VASAT, PETER S
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
200 granted / 397 resolved
-19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
429
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 397 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This is the first Office Action on the merits and is responsive to the papers filed on 11/28/2022. Claims 1-8 are currently pending and are examined below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)(a)(2) and as anticipated by Weaver (US D539615 S). Regarding claim 1, Weaver discloses a training spoon for training a user how to use a spoon (Weaver discloses a spoon eating utensil and does not disclose this as a training spoon, however this is merely a preamble statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02), comprising: A. a scoop (Fig 1. Spoon portion 2), B. a straight handle connected to said scoop (Fig 1. Left hand side, Stick 10), C. an angled handed rigidly connected to said straight handle (Fig. 1 shows an angled handle rigidly connected to a straight handle 10 on the left side. The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis), wherein said straight handle is grabbable by the user and wherein said angled handle is grabbable by a trainer while assisting the user in the usage of said training spoon (Fig. 1 shows an angled handle rigidly connected to a straight handle 10 on the left side. The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis). Regarding claim 5, Weavers disclose a method for using a training spoon (Weaver discloses a spoon eating utensil and does not disclose this as a training spoon, however this is merely a preamble statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02) comprising the steps of: acquiring a training spoon, said training spoon (Weaver discloses a spoon eating utensil and does not disclose this as a training spoon, however this is merely a preamble statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02) comprising: a scoop (Fig 1. Spoon portion 2), a straight handle connected to said scoop (Fig 1. Left hand side, Stick 10), an angled handle connected to said straight handle (Fig. 1 shows an angled handle rigidly connected to a straight handle 10 on the left side. The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis.), grabbing said straight handle (Fig 1. Stick 10 that can be grabbed), wherein said grabbing of said straight handle is accomplished by the user (Fig. 1 shows an angled handle rigidly connected to a straight handle 10 on the left side that is grabbable), C. grabbing said angled handle (The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis that can be grabbed), wherein said grabbing of said angled handle is accomplished by said trainer (The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis that can be grabbed). using said spoon to scoop food and direct food to the user's mouth (The second handle 10 on the right side shows it at an angle relative to the scoop axis that can be grabbed). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Weaver (US D539615 S). Regarding claim 3, Weaver discloses the training spoon as in Claim 1 wherein Weaver further discloses wherein said training spoon is a right-handed training spoon (Spoon in figure 1 that is capable of being a right-handed spoon in the claimed manner. This limitation is merely a statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.). It would have been obvious for one in ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in the claimed invention to have modified Weaver to make the training spoon a right-handed spoon since a majority of the world’s population is right-handed and would require for the training spoon to be a right-handed spoon. Regarding claim 4, Weaver discloses the training spoon as in Claim 1 wherein Weaver further discloses wherein said training spoon is a left-handed training spoon (Spoon in figure 1 that is capable of being a left-handed spoon in the claimed manner. This limitation is merely a statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.). It would have been obvious for one in ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in the claimed invention to have modified Weaver to make the training spoon a left-handed spoon since a significant of the world’s population is left-handed and would require for the training spoon to be a left-handed spoon. Claims 2 and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Weaver (US D539615 S) in view of Mattingly (US 20080295343 A1). Regarding claim 2, Weaver discloses the training spoon as in Claim 1 wherein Mattingly teaches wherein said training spoon is fabricated from silicone (¶15: For example, it is contemplated that the elongated member 12 of the present invention is formed from, plastic, silicone, wood, glass, stainless steel, or any other suitable material). Regarding claim 6, Weaver discloses the method as in Claim 5 wherein Mattingly teaches wherein said training spoon is fabricated from silicone (¶15: For example, it is contemplated that the elongated member 12 of the present invention is formed from, plastic, silicone, wood, glass, stainless steel, or any other suitable material). It would have been obvious for one in ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in the claimed invention to have modified Weaver to incorporate the teachings of Mattingly because silicone is known for being flexible and lightweight for ease of use, especially for children. In addition, silicone for a training spoon would reduce the risk of injury, such as scraping and poking in a child's mouth, since children have a habit of biting down on utensils when eating, and thus would improve the comfort during eating. Regarding claim 7, Weaver discloses the method as in Claim 5 wherein Weaver further discloses wherein said training spoon is a right-handed training spoon (Spoon in figure 1 that is capable of being a right-handed spoon in the claimed manner. This limitation is merely a statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.) It would have been obvious for one in ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in the claimed invention to have modified Weaver to make the training spoon a right-handed spoon since a majority of the world’s population is right-handed and would require for the training spoon to be a right-handed spoon. Regarding claim 8, Weaver discloses the method as in Claim 5 wherein Weaver further discloses wherein said training spoon is a left-handed training spoon (Spoon in figure 1 that is capable of being a left-handed spoon in the claimed manner. This limitation is merely a statement of intended use that does not further limit the claim. Therefore, Weaver meets the claim. See MPEP 2111.02.). It would have been obvious for one in ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in the claimed invention to have modified Weaver to make the training spoon a left-handed spoon since a significant of the world’s population is left-handed and would require for the training spoon to be a left-handed spoon. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BASHER ALI GHALEB whose telephone number is (571)272-5135. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at (571)270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BASHER ALI GHALEB/Examiner, Art Unit 3715 /PETER S VASAT/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 28, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12544627
DEVICE FOR LEARNING AND TRAINING THE UNDERWATER DOLPHIN KICK AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 10820861
ENDOTRACHEAL TUBES AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING BREATHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 03, 2020
Patent 10806643
ABSORBENT LAMINATE WITH MULTIPLE SUBSTRATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2020
Patent 10799657
POWER MANAGEMENT IN RESPIRATORY TREATMENT APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2020
Patent 10765570
NULL
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2020
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+32.9%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 397 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month