Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/071,280

IDENTIFICATION MARK-BEARING GLASS PLATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IDENTIFICATION MARK-BEARING GLASS PLATE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Priority
Jun 01, 2020 — JP 2020-095748 +1 more
Examiner
LIU, CHRIS Q
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
AGC Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
279 granted / 402 resolved
-0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
423
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 402 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/26/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment With respect to the claim drawing objection, applicant canceled claims 17 and 19, which overcome the drawing objection. Therefore the drawing objection is withdrawn. With respect to the claim rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) and 112 (b), applicant amended claims 9, 12, and canceled claims 13, 17 filed on 08/26/2026, which overcome the claim rejection. Therefore the claim rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 (a) and 112 (b) are withdrawn. However, new claim rejection is raised due to the claim amendment. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 08/26/2026 is persuasive. Reference Notsu does not teach every limitation in amended claim 1. Therefore the claim rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 9-12, 14-16, 18, and 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 9, the limitation “An identification mark-bearing glass plate consisting of a glass” is lacking support in the specification. The specification does not disclose the identification mark-bearing glass plate only comprising glass. In fact, the specification disclose the identification mark-bearing glass plate comprising other material/component other than glass, such as a thermoplastic resin and a coating layer. Therefore the limitation is a new matter. Regarding claims 10-12, 14-16, 18, and 20-21, the claims are rejected due to their dependency on a rejected claim as shown above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRIS Q LIU whose telephone number is (571)272-8241. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ibrahime Abraham can be reached at (571) 270-5569. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRIS Q LIU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Mar 25, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 25, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745778
REMOVABLE BASE FOR CAKE PAN
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733766
Extractor for Cold Brew Coffee and the Likes
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728473
Systems and Methods to Control Welding Processes Using Weld Pool Attributes
5y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727712
KITCHEN APPLIANCE WITH CHARGE CONTROL OF AN AUXILIARY DEVICE
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727709
INDUCTION CHAMBER DOOR OPENING AND CLOSING DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+37.1%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 402 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month