Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/071,672

BEARER CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND TERMINAL

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 30, 2022
Priority
Jun 11, 2020 — CN 202010531658.0 +1 more
Examiner
KAUR, PAMIT
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
505 granted / 630 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
652
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
87.2%
+47.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 630 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-13, 16, 18-20 are subject under examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-13, 16, 18-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation " the second remote terminal" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 7 recites the limitation " the second remote terminal" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation " the first reconfiguration message" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 1 and 7, applicant is claiming “ the first reconfiguration message is used to send a second reconfiguration message to the second remote terminal”. It is vague and unclear who is using the first reconfiguration message to send the second reconfiguration message? Is the first remote terminal or the relay terminal? Claim 13, applicant is claiming “ the second reconfiguration message is sent based on the first reconfiguration message”. It is vague and unclear in the claim who is who is generating or creating the first reconfiguration message? And who is it (the first reconfiguration message) is being transmitted to? Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAMIT KAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-5665. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NOEL BEHARRY can be reached at 5712705630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAMIT KAUR/Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jan 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 29, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 20, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641549
POWER HEADROOM REPORT TRIGGERING BY DORMANT BANDWIDTH PART SWITCHING
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641636
RESOURCE ALLOCATION METHOD, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634771
Responding to Second Base Station Addition Request for Vehicle-To-Everything (V2X)
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628239
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DATA TRANSFER AND POWER HEADROOM REPORTING IN RRC_INACTIVE STATE IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621760
Network Controlled Repeater
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.2%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 630 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month