Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/072,214

DOUBLE SLEEVE PLUNGER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 30, 2022
Examiner
ANDREWS, DAVID L
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Epic Lift Systems
OA Round
6 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
693 granted / 967 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 967 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The amendment filed 8/12/2025 has been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments The amendment filed 8/12/2025 overcomes the prior 102 rejection under Dinning with the claims reciting the outlet of the inner sleeve as at a terminal end. However, applicant’s arguments regarding the function of the spring of Dinning as not being a clutch as claimed are not persuasive. The spring of Dinning is considered a clutch as claimed since the spring necessarily exerts a force as claimed and the plunger must open and close as claimed in order to function as a plunger, and therefore the Dinning is considered to have a clutch as claimed. As the spring/clutch of Dinning is the only structure shown as providing any friction to the inner sleeve, and the inner sleeve does move as claimed during ascent and descent, the clutch necessarily applies friction as claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-9, 20-23, 25-31, 42-51, 62-69 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Giacomino (US 7,314,080) in view of Dinning (US 6,045,335). In regard to claim 1, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6); the inner sleeve located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between an open position and a closed position (as in fig 5/6), wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 3, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the bore in the inner sleeve includes one or more ports (48A-C) through which well liquids and gasses pass from the well into the bore of the inner sleeve when the inner sleeve is in its open position (as in fig 5). In regard to claim 4, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is located in an upper end of the plunger (160 as in fig 8). In regard to claim 5, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes at least one leaf spring (73 as in fig 7 as may be used col. 10, lines 50-55). In regard to claim 6, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is adjustable to provide more or less retarding force on the movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (col. 10, lines 60-67, as adjusted by alignment with recesses 115/116). In regard to claim 7, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a tension nut (112, as part of the clutch as biasing against 161 through 141 as in fig 8). In regard to claim 8, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a cage (131, as may be defined). In regard to claim 9, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a clutch locking ring (141, as may be defined). In regard to claim 20, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6); the inner sleeve located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between an open position and a closed position (as in fig 5/6), wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position such that the clutch maintains the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well and maintains the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch maintains the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and maintains the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 21, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a first bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a second bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the second bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6); wherein the inner sleeve is located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between an open position and a closed position (as in fig 5/6), wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 22, Giacomino discloses wherein more well liquids and gases pass through the second bore than through the first bore when the inner sleeve is in its open position (as in fig 5 where substantially all fluids would pass through second bore). In regard to claim 23, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6) and wherein the inner sleeve is located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between an open position and a closed position (as in fig 5/6), wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 25, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the inner sleeve includes one or more ports (48A-C) through which well liquids and gasses pass from the well into the bore of the inner sleeve when the inner sleeve is in its open position. In regard to claim 26, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is located in an upper end of the plunger (160 as in fig 8). In regard to claim 27, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes at least one leaf spring (73 as in fig 7 as may be used col. 10, lines 50-55). In regard to claim 28, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is adjustable to provide more or less retarding force on the movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (col. 10, lines 60-67, as adjusted by alignment with recesses 115/116). In regard to claim 29, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a tension nut (112, as part of the clutch as biasing against 161 through 141 as in fig 8). In regard to claim 30, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a cage (131, as may be defined). In regard to claim 31, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a clutch locking ring (141, as may be defined). In regard to claim 42, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6) and wherein the inner sleeve is located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between a first position and a second position (as in fig 5/6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second position such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its second position as the plunger ascends in the well and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its first position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its second position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its first position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 43, Giacomino discloses wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). In regard to claim 44, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the inlet of the bore is located between the first terminal end and the second terminal end of the outer sleeve, and wherein the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6); the inner sleeve located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between an open position and a closed position (as in fig 5/6), wherein well liquids and gases are able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve from the inlet to the outlet in the open position (as in fig 5) and substantially are not able to pass through the bore of the inner sleeve in the closed position (as in fig 6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve) such that the clutch exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its closed position as the plunger ascends in the well (as in fig 8, col. 5, lines 32-35; as 160 only component interacting with inner sleeve, and must remain closed during ascent to operate as desired) and exerts sufficient force against the inner sleeve to maintain the inner sleeve in its open position as the plunger descends in the well (as in fig 9, col. 5, lines 36-39, where must remain in the open position during descent to operate as desired). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 45, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the bore in the inner sleeve includes one or more ports (48A-C) through which well liquids and gasses pass from the well into the bore of the inner sleeve when the inner sleeve is in its open position. In regard to claim 46, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is located in an upper end (160 as in fig 8) of the plunger. In regard to claim 47, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes at least one leaf spring (73 as in fig 7 as may be used col. 10, lines 50-55). In regard to claim 48, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is adjustable to provide more or less retarding force on the movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (col. 10, lines 60-67, as adjusted by alignment with recesses 115/116). In regard to claim 49, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a tension nut (112 as part of the clutch as biasing against 161 through 141 as in fig 8). In regard to claim 50, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a cage (131, as may be defined). In regard to claim 51, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch includes a clutch locking ring (141, as may be defined). In regard to claim 62, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the outlet of the bore is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45 as in fig 5/6); the inner sleeve located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between a first position and a second position (as in fig 5/6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second position. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second positions (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 63, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the bore in the inner sleeve includes one or more ports (48A-C) through which well liquids and gasses pass from the well into the bore of the inner sleeve when the inner sleeve is in its open position (as in fig 5). In regard to claim 64, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the bore in the inner sleeve is located between the first terminal end and the second terminal end of the inner sleeve (as in fig 5/6). In regard to claim 65, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is adjustable to provide more or less retarding force on the movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (col. 10, lines 60-67, as adjusted by alignment with recesses 115/116). In regard to claim 66, Giacomino discloses a plunger for use in a well, comprising: an outer sleeve (20, as in fig 5/6) including a bore; an inner sleeve (40) having a first terminal end (top) and a second terminal end (bottom) and further including a bore having an inlet (at 48) and an outlet (at 45, col. 6, line 65 – col. 7, line 8), where the inlet of the bore is located between the first terminal end and the second terminal end of the inner sleeve (fig 5/6); the inner sleeve located at least partially in the bore of the outer sleeve and adapted to move between a first position and a second position (as in fig 5/6). Giacomino does not disclose a clutch for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second position. Dinning discloses a plunger for use in a well including a clutch (160) for retarding movement of the inner sleeve between its first and second positions (as shown would provide friction between the inner and outer sleeve). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide the plunger as taught by Giacomino with the clutch as taught by Dinning since combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is considered obvious to one of ordinary skill. In regard to claim 67, Giacomino discloses wherein the outlet of the bore in the inner sleeve is located at the first terminal end of the inner sleeve (at 45). In regard to claim 68, Giacomino discloses wherein the inlet of the bore in the inner sleeve includes one or more ports (48A-C) through which well liquids and gasses pass from the well into the bore of the inner sleeve when the inner sleeve is in its open position (as in fig 5). In regard to claim 69, Dinning discloses wherein the clutch is adjustable to provide more or less retarding force on the movement of the inner sleeve between its open and closed position (col. 10, lines 60-67, as adjusted by alignment with recesses 115/116). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10-19, 32-41, and 52-61 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to D Andrews whose telephone number is (571)272-6558. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7-3. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached at 571-272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D. ANDREWS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3672 10/28/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2022
Application Filed
May 06, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 29, 2024
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 08, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 12, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 05, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 27, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 12, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601258
UNDERGROUND RESERVOIR MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595706
Underground Drill Rig And Systems And Methods Of Using Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12565814
DOWNHOLE WELL TOOL HAVING A CONNECTOR MECHANISM WITH A CLEANING DIELECTRIC CHAMBER FOR WELL SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12546172
COATINGS FOR WEAR SURFACES AND RELATED APPARATUSES, DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546182
HIGH EXPANSION PACKER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 967 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month