Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/074,108

GLASS WITH UNIQUE FRACTURE BEHAVIOR FOR VEHICLE WINDSHIELD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 02, 2022
Priority
Dec 06, 2021 — provisional 63/286,270 +1 more
Examiner
LE, HOA T
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Corning Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
787 granted / 1084 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1134
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1084 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on February 12, 2026 has been entered. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-16 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The original specification describes a borosilicate glass composition to comprise at least three components: at least 74 mol% SiO2, at least 10 mol% B2O3, and at least some Al2O3 (instant specification, paragraph [079], emphases added). Other components including Fe or FeO are components in addition to the three essential components mentioned above. The original specification provides no support for the newly added feature; that is the borosilicate glass composition comprises just two components SiO2 and Fe, which would not result in the borosilicate glass composition as disclosed in the original specification or known in the art because absence of boron or borate, and alumina, a borosilicate glass cannot be formed. Therefore, the newly added feature (ii) is new matter and must be canceled or be amended to be commensurate with the description of the originally filed specification. Response to Arguments Applicant argues that the new feature is a recapture of the limitation that was allowed. However, as discussed above, if the claims 17 and 18 had not been canceled, a new matter would have been held in one of the previous office actions prior to allowance. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21 is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOA (Holly) LE whose telephone number is (571)272-1511. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached at 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOA (Holly) LE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1788 /HOA (Holly) LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 24, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637601
ABRASIVE ARTICLE INCLUDING SHAPED ABRASIVE PARTICLES
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630695
RESIN COMPOSITION, ACOUSTIC MEMBER, ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER, ULTRASOUND PROBE, AND ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624221
COMPOSITION FOR COATING AN OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624727
Ceramic Ball Material comprising a band-portion over surface of a spherical portion, and Method For Manufacturing Ceramic Ball
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624728
CERAMIC BALL MATERIAL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CERAMIC BALL USING SAME, AND CERAMIC BALL
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.6%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1084 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month