Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/077,418

Display Device

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 08, 2022
Examiner
KOSLOW, CAROL M
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
1775 granted / 2171 resolved
+16.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
2217
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§102
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 2171 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This action is in response to applicants’ amendment of 9 December 2025. The amendments to the specification and the replacement figure have overcome the objections to the drawings. In view of applicants’ arguments, the 35 USC 112(a) rejection over claims 3-7 and 18-21 are withdrawn. The 35 USC 112(a) rejection over claims 1, 2, 8-17, 22 and 23 have been modified in view of applicants’ argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 2, 8-17, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 8-1, 22 and 23 teach a light conversion layer comprises a “perovskite matrix comprising a perovskite including an organic ammonium ion which acts as a spacer”, which reads on any large organic ammonium ion containing perovskite. Claim 8 teaches a light conversion layer comprises a “perovskite matrix comprising a perovskite including an organic ammonium ion which acts as a spacer”, which reads on any large organic ammonium ion containing perovskite, as long as the lattice constant of the perovskite has a lattice constant ratio between the perovskite and the quantum dot is in the range of ±3%. Paragraphs [0089]- [0090] teaches the perovskite of the perovskite matrix in the light conversion layer has a mixed 2D and 3D structure, multi-bandgaps and can be callable of . There is no structure limitations in the rejected claims and thus the perovskite of the claims can have a 2D structure; be capable of absorbing blue light that is not absorbed by the quantum dots of the light conversion layer and be capable of transferring the absorbed blue light in the form of charges to the quantum dots. The claimed perovksites are not limited to those having the structure, bandgaps and possible optical properties taught in the specification. The claims include perovskite that have a 2D structure (which have the formula A2Bn-1MnX3n+1, where A and B are both ammonium ions, M is a metal cation, X is a halogen and n is an integer of 1 or more), those that have a single bandgap, those that have such a larger bandgap that it is not absorbing blue light, and those not capable of converting light to charges. Thus the specification does not support and reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventors, at the time the application was filed, had possession of all the embodiments of the claimed invention. Applicants’ arguments have been considered but are not convincing. The claims do not require the argued 2D and 3D structure and argued bandgaps as discussed above. The rejection is maintained. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7 and 18-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. There is no teaching or suggestion in the art of record of a display device having the structure of claim 1 or 14 wherein the light conversion layers in the device comprise a perovskite matrix and quantum dots, where the perovskite matrix is represented by the formula An-1 B2MnX3n+1, n is an integer of 2 or more, x is a halogen anion, M is metal cation, B is a cation and A is an organic ammonium ion. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. MELISSA KOSLOW whose telephone number is (571)272-1371. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tues:7:45-3:45 EST;Thurs-Fri:6:30-2:00EST; and Wed:7:45-2:00EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C Melissa Koslow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734 cmk 1/21/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600907
SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOT STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595412
CERAMIC COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CERAMIC COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593609
Thermoelectric Nanocomposite Materials
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586701
COMPLEX MAGNETIC COMPOSITION, MAGNETIC MEMBER, AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577166
Manganese-zinc Ferrite with High Magnetic Permeability at Negative Temperature and Low Loss at High Temperature and Method for Preparing Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 2171 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month