Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/078,046

METAL-AIR BATTERY MODULE

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Dec 08, 2022
Priority
Dec 15, 2021 — JP 2021-203259
Examiner
WALKER, KEITH D
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allowance Rate
121 granted / 345 resolved
-29.9% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 7m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
356
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 345 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending examination as discussed below. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on 12/8/22 has been placed in the application file and the information referred to therein has been considered as to the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, line 5 recites a “film-like” material, however, what is defined and what constitutes a film-like material and what doesn’t constitute a film-like material isn’t clear from the specification. As the metes and bounds of the term are unknown, the claim is found indefinite. It is suggested applicant delete the term “-like”. Claims 2-10 are rejected for being dependent upon rejected claim 1. Regarding claim 1, the last line uses the term “both components”, however there is nothing in the claim that corresponds to this term. It is presumed and being interpreted to mean the metal-air battery cell and the plate member make up the “both components”. Applicant is invited to make an appropriate change for clarity. Claims 2-10 are rejected for being dependent upon rejected claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over US 2020/0243937 (Kaga) in view of US 4547438 (McAurther) and US 2017/0104253 (Choi). Regarding claims 1 & 9, Kaga teaches a metal air battery (abstract) with a packaging material provided with openings and a water repellant film [0044, 0048, 0050, 0078]) welded as to covert the opening ([0086]). It is noted that thermally bonding as described is seen as welding. Kaga is silent to a plate member. While Kaga teaches spacers between each of the batteries to allow air flow (Fig. 18, [0133]), Kaga doesn’t teach the spacers as being a plate. Choi teaches a metal air battery system that uses a plate member between each of the batteries and allows air flow to the cathode side of the battery (Figs. 2A-4; [0052, 0055-0061]). Choi teaches this allows for air to be directed to the cathode and the plate can be used as current collector. Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the air flow plate of Choi in the battery module of Kaga to aid in air flow and use as a current collector. Kaga is silent to a pair of fixing members. McArthur teaches a battery assembly to house multiple metal air batteries (Abstract, Fig. 1, 2:1-11, 3:40-45). The housing includes a pair of fixing members (56, 58, 60) at a surface end in a surface direction, which are opposingly arranged and sandwich the cells together (Fig. 1, 4:35-55). The fixing members aid in keeping the cells from moving. Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to use the fixing members of McArthur with the cells of Kaga to keep the cells and the plates from moving around when forming a battery assembly. Regarding claims 2-4, Kaga in view of Choi shows the plate member has multiple contactors that make contact with the metal air battery (Fig. 2A). As for the contact density being denser in one region versus another, it is well known in the art to vary the protuberances of the flow plate to change and improve the air flow of the batteries or the electrical conductivity of the assembly. The contact regions face the openings and water repellant film. Regarding claims 5 & 6, Choi teaches the contactor is a corrugated plate shape with a channel to parallel to the flow of air (Fig.2A). Regarding claims 7, 8 & 10, Choi teaches the contactor can be cylindrical, spindle shaped and can have holes through it (Figs. 4A-5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH WALKER whose telephone number is (571)272-3458. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Keith Walker/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 08, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Aug 28, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 29, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12467105
Method for Manufacturing a High Strength Steel Sheet having Improved Formability and Sheet Obtained
8y 10m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12435383
HIGH STRENGTH MULTI-PHASE STEEL HAVING EXCELLENT BURRING PROPERTIES AT LOW TEMPERATURE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
6y 4m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 12371763
SM-FE-N-BASED MAGNET POWDER, SM-FE-N-BASED SINTERED MAGNET, AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 29, 2025
Patent 12152285
METHOD FOR THERMAL PROCESSING BULLETS
4y 11m to grant Granted Nov 26, 2024
Patent 11872616
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COLD-FORGED, EXTRUDED ALUMINUM ALLOY TUBE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jan 16, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+23.5%)
4y 7m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 345 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month