Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/083,194

WATER DISTRIBUTING DEVICE FOR COFFEE MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 16, 2022
Examiner
NORTON, JOHN J
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
I Cherng Refrigeration Industrial Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
449 granted / 669 resolved
-2.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
726
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 669 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a) because they fail to show the first engaging recess (element 311) as described in the specification. Element 311 is labeled in fig. 6, but the figure is a series of annular lines with an insufficient indication of what the recess is supposed to be, and how it is supposed to engage with the flow channel unit. Any structural detail that is essential for a proper understanding of the disclosed invention should be shown in the drawing. MPEP § 608.02(d). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claims 1 and 10 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1, second-to-last line, should be amended to replace “outletthat” with “outlet that.” Claim 10, line 5, should be amended to replace “has” with “having.” Claims 2–9 are objected to due to dependency upon an objected-to claim. Claim Rejections — 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Park (KR 2017-0099359 A). Park discloses a water distributing device adapted for use in a coffee machine, comprising: a body housing (at least the lower part 10 shown in fig. 5) including a bottom wall that has a water intake (136, 134-3a) passing therethrough along a central axis (clearly shown in fig. 5), and a surrounding wall that extends from a periphery of said bottom wall and that cooperates with said bottom wall to define a water entry space (clearly shown with the lower part 10 in fig. 5); and a round-contoured flow channel unit (134-3) disposed downstream of said body housing and defining a plurality of water guide channels (134-3c) that are in fluid communication with said water intake (via 134-3d), each water guide channel extending away from said central axis in a radial direction that is perpendicular to said central axis (see fig. 5), being curved in a tangential direction that is perpendicular to said central axis and said radial direction (ibid.), and having a water outlet (134-3b) that is located away from said central axis. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2–10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the objections set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Especially given how particular the structure shown in Yoon is (with respect both to the flow channel unit as well as the overall structure with the water management structures 10), the subject matter of each of dependent claims 2, 6, and 7 are specific, and are not suggested in the prior art. Dependent claims 3–5 and 8–10 depend from claims 2 and 7, respectively. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ozturk et al. (WO 2020/120031 A1) and Hoysted (GB 2329825 A) disclose flow channel units similar to what is claimed and disclosed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to John J. Norton whose telephone number is (571) 272-5174. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edward F. Landrum can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J NORTON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599148
SEMI-AUTOMATIC MACHINE FOR CRUSHING AND FOR COLLECTING OUTSIDE FROZEN FOOD SUBSTANCES FOR A SUBSEQUENT FOOD USE OF SAID FOOD SUBSTANCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575020
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF STORAGE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575004
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING A HEATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564978
SLICED TOPPING ALIGNMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557934
ADDITIVE CONTAINER WITH BOTTOM COVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+29.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 669 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month