Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/085,109

SPATIOTEMPORAL DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD BASED ON GRAPH NEURAL CONTROLLED DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 20, 2022
Priority
Nov 14, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0151819
Examiner
YAARY, MICHAEL D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY FOUNDATION, YONSEI UNIVERSITY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
881 granted / 1011 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1025
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1011 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION 1. Claims 1-12 are pending in the application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 4. Claim(s) 1-3 and 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Pal et al (hereafter Pal)(US Pub. 20240012875) in view of Deng et al (hereafter Deng)(US Pub. 20220383109). 5. As to claim 1, Pal discloses a spatiotemporal data processing apparatus based on a graph neural controlled differential equation ([abstract, [0004], and [0081]) comprising: a preprocessing unit configured to generate a continuous path for each node in time series data ([0038]-[0039], [0044], and [0056]). Pal does not disclose a main processing unit configured to combine a graph convolution network (GCN) with a neural controlled differential equation (NCDE) for the generated path to perform integration processing on temporal information and spatial information, wherein the main processing unit performs temporal processing and spatial processing on each node with two controlled differential equation (CDE) functions to calculate a last hidden vector and forecast an output layer. However, Deng discloses a main processing unit configured to combine a graph convolution network (GCN) with a neural controlled differential equation (NCDE) for the generated path to perform integration processing on temporal information and spatial information ([0058] Neural controlled differential equations [0061] integral equations), wherein the main processing unit performs temporal processing and spatial processing on each node with two controlled differential equation (CDE) functions to calculate a last hidden vector and forecast an output layer ([0058], [0066], [0070] and [0074] Even though latent ODE models may have continuous latent trajectories, the latent state may be decoded into observations at each time step independently. Neural controlled differential equations (CDEs) and rough differential equations (RDEs) may propagate a hidden state across time continuously using controlled differential equations driven by functions of time interpolated from observations on irregular time grids. While the above described example models can be applied to various inference tasks on irregular time series, these examples may not be a generative model of time series data). 6. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the teachings of Pal by incorporating the neural controlled differential equations and processing, as in Deng, for the benefit of improved flow-based decoding of a generic stochastic differential equation as a principled framework for continuous dynamics modeling from irregular time-series data. 7. As to claims 2 and 8, the combination of Pal and Deng discloses wherein the preprocessing unit performs an interpolation algorithm on each node to generate the continuous path (Deng [0037] and [0058]). 8. As to claims 3 and 9, the combination of Pal and Deng discloses wherein the preprocessing unit uses a natural cubic spline as the interpolation algorithm (Deng [0037] and [0058]). 9. As to claim 7, the claim is rejected for similar reasons as to claim 1 above. Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 4-6 and 10-12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The claims recite at least wherein the main processing unit includes a first NCDE module configured to perform the temporal processing on the continuous path of each node to generate a hidden trajectory of the temporal information; and a second NCDE module configured to perform the spatial processing on the continuous path of each node to generate a hidden trajectory of the spatial information. The prior art of record as in above, teaches the claimed limitations of the independent claims, however; the prior art of record does not teach or suggest at least the main processing unit includes a first NCDE module configured to perform the temporal processing on the continuous path of each node to generate a hidden trajectory of the temporal information; and a second NCDE module configured to perform the spatial processing on the continuous path of each node to generate a hidden trajectory of the spatial information. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL D YAARY whose telephone number is (571)270-1249. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Trujillo can be reached at (571)272-3677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL D. YAARY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2151
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681694
MULTIPLIER, METHOD, INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIP, AND COMPUTING DEVICE FOR FLOATING POINT OPERATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12663964
MEMORY DEVICE AND COMPUTING METHOD
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663965
INFORMATION PROCESSING CIRCUIT AND METHOD OF DESIGNING INFORMATION PROCESSING CIRCUIT
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663966
SYSTOLIC ARRAY INCLUDING FUSED MULTIPLY ACCUMULATE WITH EFFICIENT PRENORMALIZATION AND EXTENDED DYNAMIC RANGE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12657006
PROCESSING COMPONENT, DATA PROCESSING METHOD, AND RELATED DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+8.1%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1011 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month