Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/085,697

WAGERING ON EVENTS IN A STREAMING ENVIRONMENT

Final Rejection §101§112
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Examiner
DOSHI, ANKIT B
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Igt
OA Round
4 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
375 granted / 563 resolved
-3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
599
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 563 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s Submission of a Response Applicant’s submission of a response on 5/21/2026 has been received and considered. In the response, Applicant amended claims 1, 3 – 6, 8 – 10, 12, 14 – 17, 19 and 20. Therefore, claims 1 – 20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. With regards to claims 1 – 20, Applicant has amended the claims to include “a plurality commitments associated with a future activation”. The original specification does not have limitations anywhere to be found. Additionally, Applicant has provided no paragraph to where they believe support can be found. The specification mentions “a commitment from the user at the streaming device” (see [0070]) and “game play activation device” (see [0133]), but does not mention or define what is “a plurality of commitments” and “a future activation”. Further, steps provided when the opening of the access door is detected is not in the original specification. All dependent claims inherit the deficiencies of the claim(s) from which they depend and are similarly rejected for the same reason. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 - 20 have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to all of the references being used in the current rejection. Applicant's amendment to claims 1, 3 – 6, 8 – 10, 12, 14 – 17, 19 and 20 has been fully considered. The addition of "a plurality of commitments associated with a future activation," together with the steps performed "when an opening of the access door" occurs, is sufficient to integrate the recited abstract idea into a practical application under Step 2A, Prong Two, and the rejection of claims 1 – 20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 is therefore withdrawn. Applicant is advised, however, that the limitations relied upon to confer patent eligibility namely, "a plurality of commitments associated with a future activation" and the steps performed "when an opening of the access door" occurs are the same subject matter now rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a), as the specification does not disclose this subject matter. The withdrawal of the 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection is predicated on the presence of these limitations in the claim. Accordingly, should Applicant overcome the 35 U.S.C. 112(a) rejection by amending to remove or alter these limitations, the basis for withdrawing the 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection would no longer be present, and the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 may be reinstated in a subsequent Office Action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANKIT B DOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-7863. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri. ~8:30 - ~5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at 571-272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANKIT B DOSHI/Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112
Apr 11, 2026
Interview Requested
May 21, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701287
REAL-TIME INTERACTIVE PLATFORM FOR LIVE STREAMS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12661592
LIKE BUTTON
6y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636578
SIMULATED SPACE LOCAL PARTITION REASSIGNMENT AND APPLICATION AUTOSCALING
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12611586
System and Method for Generating Daily-Updated Rating of Individual Player Performance in Sports
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12605625
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF A GAMING APPLICATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+22.3%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 563 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month