Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/086,746

ENDOSCOPE WITH NOISE MITIGATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Examiner
HICKS, CHARLES N
Art Unit
2424
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ambu A/S
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 494 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
511
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 494 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 10/25/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. 112 and 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 6. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Johnsen (US 2024/0197150), hereinafter referred to as Johnsen, in view of Switzer (US 2022/0000346), hereinafter referred to as Switzer. 7. Regarding claim 1, Johnsen discloses an intrusive medical device comprising: a proximal end and a distal end spaced apart from the proximal end (paragraph 41 wherein endoscope comprises a proximal handle adapted to be gripped by a hand of an operator. And from the handle, an insertion cord extends towards the distal end of the endoscope); a tubular member defining a lumen therein, the tubular member extending from the proximal end to the distal end (paragraphs 41 and 47 wherein insertion cord comprises an insertion tube and a bending section extending therefrom, and wherein the inner compartment accommodates an electronic vision device and at least one light source); a camera positioned at the distal end (paragraph 42 wherein circuitry operable to configure the live video captured by the image sensor of the camera module of the endoscope). However, Johnsen is silent in regards to disclosing a bundle of at least four unpaired conductors, the bundle extending from the proximal end to the distal end and electrically connected to the camera at the distal end, wherein the bundle is twisted at a pitch of 15 mm +/- 10 mm. Switzer discloses a bundle of at least four unpaired conductors, the bundle extending from the proximal end to the distal end and electrically connected to the camera at the distal end, wherein the bundle is twisted at a pitch of 15 mm +/- 10 mm (paragraphs 11, 268 and 278 wherein the outer diameter of the insertion tube may be in the range of 8 mm to 16 mm, 10 mm to 14 mm, or approximately 12 mm, in order to allow a propulsion tube being fixed within or formed as part of an insertion tube of the endoscope). Switzer provides motivation to combine the references wherein a propulsion tube being fixed within or formed as part of an insertion tube of the endoscope (paragraph 11). Therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the invention to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Johnsen with the insertion tube of Switzer in order to allow a propulsion tube being fixed within or formed as part of an insertion tube of the endoscope (paragraph 11). 8. Claims 2-4, 6-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Johnsen, in view of Switzer, in further view of Gal (US 2015/0305602), hereinafter referred to as Gal. 9. Regarding claim 2, Johnsen and Switzer are silent in regards to disclosing the intrusive medical device of claim 1, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors include a ground conductor, a camera power conductor, a clock conductor and a data conductor; wherein the at least four unpaired conductors are arranged cross-sectionally with the data conductor positioned between two of the at least four unpaired conductors; and wherein the two of the at least four unpaired conductors does not include the clock conductor. However, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 1, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors include a ground conductor, a camera power conductor, a clock conductor and a data conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable may include a power conductor, a ground conductor, and an image data conductor for sending image data from camera to video console, and wherein image data and control signals may be modulated on the same conductors, resulting in a total of four conductors); wherein the at least four unpaired conductors are arranged cross-sectionally with the data conductor positioned between two of the at least four unpaired conductors (fig. 4-5, paragraphs 68 and 77 wherein a side view of camera and camera body, and shows a cross-sectional view), and wherein the two of the at least four unpaired conductors does not include the clock conductor (paragraph 51 wherein data serializer may also be used to reduce the number of conductors needed to transmit image data in a serialized format). Gal provides motivation to combine the references wherein “clip-on” cameras typically transmit image information to a video-processing console, which sits on the endoscopic tower via a multi-conductor cable (paragraph 7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Johnsen and Switzer with the teachings of Gal wherein “clip-on” cameras typically transmit image information to a video-processing console, which sits on the endoscopic tower via a multi-conductor cable (paragraph 7). 10. Regarding claim 3, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 2, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors consist of five unpaired conductors including the ground conductor, the camera power conductor, the clock conductor, the data conductor, and a light power conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable and connectors each have six conductors: two for power and ground, two for inter-chip communication (I2C), and two for low voltage differential signal (LVDS) used to transmit image data), and wherein the data conductor is positioned immediately next to the ground conductor and/or the camera power conductor and/or the light power conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable may include a power conductor, a ground conductor, and an image data conductor for sending image data from camera to video console). 11. Regarding claim 4, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 3, wherein each of the conductors is insulated, and wherein each of the conductors, without the insulation, comprises a diameter of between 0.0790 and 0.210 mm (paragraph 69 wherein the wall thickness of bundle sheath 300 is between about 0.025 mm and about 0.127 mm, with the remaining space in lumen 306 to be maximally packed with illumination bundle). 12. Regarding claim 6, Johnsen discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 1, wherein the intrusive medical device comprises an endoscope including: a positioning interface having a distal end (paragraph 41 wherein the handle an insertion cord extends towards the distal end of the endoscope); an insertion cord connected to and extending from the distal end of the positioning interface and comprising an insertion tube, a bending section, and a tip housing (paragraph 41 wherein the handle an insertion cord extends towards the distal end of the endoscope), the camera positioned in the tip housing (paragraph 42 wherein circuitry operable to configure the live video captured by the image sensor of the camera module of the endoscope), the tubular member extending from the positioning interface through the insertion tube to the tip housing, wherein the bundle extends from the positioning interface to the tip housing (paragraph 41 wherein insertion cord comprises an insertion tube and a bending section extending therefrom). 13. Regarding claim 7, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 6, wherein the bundle of at least four unpaired conductors is enclosed in an electrical shield (paragraph 85 wherein pieces help seal the inside of camera body. LED cover also shields any excess light from LED from escaping into the user's environment). 14. Regarding claim 8, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 7, wherein the electrical shield is electrically disconnected at the distal end of the bundle (paragraph 85 wherein lever may be designed to bottom out on the distal end of front cap 406 to allow consistent alignment of the various lumens and cameras). 15. Regarding claim 9, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 7, wherein the bundle has a proximal end, and wherein the electrical shield is only grounded at the proximal end of the bundle (paragraph 85 wherein pieces help seal the inside of camera body. LED cover also shields any excess light from LED from escaping into the user's environment). 16. Regarding claim 10, Switzer discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 6, wherein the tip housing comprises a diameter smaller than 3.4 mm (paragraphs 178 and 243 wherein porous ceramic material may be formed as a disc having a diameter similar to an inner diameter of the propulsion tube and a thickness in the range of 0.5 mm to 5 mm, 1 mm to 3 mm, or 1 mm to 2 mm, and wherein accelerometer may be configured to send data generated based on the movement of the distal tip of propulsion tube unit). 17. Regarding claim 11, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 6, wherein the tip housing comprises a diameter smaller than 3.4 mm, wherein the bundle of at least four unpaired conductors is enclosed in an electrical shield (paragraph 42 wherein cable and connectors each have six conductors: two for power and ground, two for inter-chip communication (I2C), and two for low voltage differential signal (LVDS) used to transmit image data, and wherein the electrical shield is electrically disconnected at the distal end of the bundle (paragraph 85 wherein lever may be designed to bottom out on the distal end of front cap 406 to allow consistent alignment of the various lumens and cameras). 18. Regarding claim 12, Johnsen discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 1, further comprising: a tubular member having a peripheral wall defining a lumen therein (paragraphs 41 and 47 wherein insertion cord comprises an insertion tube and a bending section extending therefrom, and wherein the inner compartment accommodates an electronic vision device and at least one light source); and an illumination lumen within the peripheral wall, wherein the camera and the bundle of at least four unpaired conductors are positioned in the illumination lumen (paragraph 42 wherein circuitry operable to configure the live video captured by the image sensor of the camera module of the endoscope). 19. Regarding claim 13, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 12, further comprising an inflatable cuff positioned at the distal end (paragraph 24 wherein method may optionally further include: removably coupling the camera body with the medical device via locking features on the mating feature and the corresponding mating feature, and wherein medical device is inflatable cuff). 20. Regarding claim 14, Johnsen discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 13, wherein the intrusive medical devise comprises a dual-lumen tube comprising a medial wall dividing the lumen into a first lumen and a second lumen (paragraph 47 wherein end wall comprises an external end surface and the surrounding side wall comprises an external surrounding side surface, forming the exterior surface of the housing). 21. Regarding claim 15, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 12, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors include a ground conductor, a camera power conductor, a clock conductor and a data conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable and connectors each have six conductors: two for power and ground, two for inter-chip communication (I2C), and two for low voltage differential signal (LVDS) used to transmit image data); wherein the at least four unpaired conductors are arranged cross-sectionally with the data conductor positioned between two of the at least four unpaired conductors (fig. 4-5, paragraphs 68 and 77 wherein a side view of camera and camera body, and shows a cross-sectional view); and wherein the two of the at least four unpaired conductors does not include the clock conductor (paragraph 51 wherein data serializer may also be used to reduce the number of conductors needed to transmit image data in a serialized format). 22. Regarding claim 16, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 15, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors consist of five unpaired conductors including the ground conductor, the camera power conductor, the clock conductor, the data conductor, and a light power conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable and connectors each have six conductors: two for power and ground, two for inter-chip communication (I2C), and two for low voltage differential signal (LVDS) used to transmit image data), and wherein the data conductor is positioned immediately next to the ground conductor and/or the camera power conductor and/or the light power conductor (paragraph 42 wherein cable may include a power conductor, a ground conductor, and an image data conductor for sending image data from camera to video console). 23. Regarding claim 18, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 12, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors include eight conductors including two pairs of twisted pair conductors (fig. 4-5, paragraphs 68 and 77 wherein a side view of camera and camera body, and shows a cross-sectional view). 24. Regarding claim 19, Gal discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 12, wherein the at least four unpaired conductors include eight conductors including a video out conductor positioned in a center of the bundle and surrounded by the other of the eight conductors (paragraph 42 wherein cable may include a power conductor, a ground conductor, and an image data conductor for sending image data from camera to video console, and wherein image data and control signals may be modulated on the same conductors, resulting in a total of four conductors). 25. Regarding claim 20, Johnsen discloses a visualization system comprising: the intrusive medical device of claim 1 (paragraphs 41 and 47 wherein insertion cord comprises an insertion tube and a bending section extending therefrom, and wherein the inner compartment accommodates an electronic vision device and at least one light source); and a video processing apparatus configured to communicatively connect with the intrusive medical device to receive a video stream therefrom (paragraph 42 wherein circuitry operable to configure the live video captured by the image sensor of the camera module of the endoscope). 26. Claims 5 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Johnsen, in view of Switzer, in further view of Gal, in further view of Rajagopalan (US 2016/0008050), hereinafter referred to as Rajagopalan. 27. Regarding claims 5 and 17, Johnsen, Switzer and Gal are silent in regards to disclosing the intrusive medical device of claim 15, wherein at least three of the at least four conductors are coaxial. However, Rajagopalan discloses the intrusive medical device of claim 15, wherein at least three of the at least four conductors are coaxial (paragraph 104 wherein first treatment device includes coaxial shafts). Rajagopalan provides motivation to combine the references wherein shafts can be inserted over a standard interventional guidewire, such as guidewire shown exiting distal end (paragraph 104). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Rask and Tanabe with the coax cable of Rajagopalan (paragraph 104). Conclusion 28. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES N HICKS whose telephone number is (571)270-3010. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-7 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES N HICKS/ Examiner, Art Unit 2424 /BENJAMIN R BRUCKART/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2424
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 24, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 24, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Interview Requested
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596760
COLLABORATIVE COMMENT ANALYSIS AND MODIFICATION TO CONTENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12574614
METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR OBTAINING TEXT MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12483684
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETECTING MULTIVIEW FILE FORMAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12457382
Identifying and Labeling Segments within Video Content
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 28, 2025
Patent 12395814
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR GROUPING EXTERNAL DEVICES BY SPACE IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 19, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+16.5%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 494 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month