Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/087,210

INTELLIGENCE PROCESSING UNIT AND 3-DIMENSIONAL POOLING OPERATION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Examiner
SALOMON, PHENUEL S
Art Unit
2146
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Sigmastar Technology Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
519 granted / 715 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 2. This office action is in response to the amendment filed on 11/26/2025. Claims 8-10 and 18-20 are canceled and claims 1-7 and 11-17 are pending and have been considered below. 3. The rejections of Claims 4-9 and 14-20 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph are moot pursuant to claims amendment. 4. The rejections of Claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. 101 as directed to non-statutory subject matter are moot pursuant to amendment and arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim(s) 1-7 and 11-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 unpatentable over GAO et al. (CN 114003859) in view of Yang et al. (CN 110473137). Claim 1. GAO discloses a three-dimensional (3D) pooling operation method for computing an input tensor to generate an output tensor, the input tensor comprising a plurality of input tiles, and the output tensor comprising a plurality of output tiles, the method comprising: (A) reading from an external memory one of the input tiles as a target input tile and storing the target input tile in a memory (…steps of obtaining three-dimensional Data…) (abstract); (B) reading from the memory the target input tile (DDR memory 320 may be used to load and store data and/or instructions) ([0065]); (C) performing a first (2D) pooling operation on the target input tile R times to generate an intermediate tensor, R being a positive integer (performing two-dimensional convolution operation on the two-dimensional input data and the two-dimensional convolution kernel to obtain a plurality of first two-dimensional convolution operation) (abstract) results); (D) performing a second 2D pooling operation on the intermediate tensor one time to generate a target output tile of the output tiles (obtaining a second two-dimensional convolution operation result of each three-dimensional data block based on the first two-dimensional convolution operation result) (abstract); and (E) storing the target output tile in the memory ([0065]); wherein, when the instruction indicates that dimensions of the input tensor include a depth dimension, a height dimension, and a width dimension, then R=Kd, and when the instruction indicates that dimensions of the input tensor include only two of the depth dimension, the height dimension, and the width dimension, then R=1, wherein, Kd is a size of a first sliding window in depth direction ([0015], [0053],[0060], claim 7). GAO does not explicitly disclose performing by a two-dimensional (2D) vector core in response to an instruction. However, Yang discloses vector calculation unit that is used for calculations such as pooling ([0098]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate this feature in GAO. One would have been motivated to do so in order to reduce space convolutional neural network model. Claim 2. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 1, GAO further discloses wherein the intermediate tensor has a first dimension parameter and a second dimension parameter, the step (D) comprising: using a third dimension parameter to represent a combination of the first dimension parameter and the second dimension parameter; and setting a size of a sliding window corresponding to the third dimension parameter to one, setting a stride of the sliding window corresponding to the third dimension parameter to one, and setting a padding corresponding to the third dimension parameter to zero ([0015],[0024], [0034],[0060]). Claim 3. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 2, GAO discloses wherein a product of the first dimension parameter and the second dimension parameter is equal to the third dimension parameter ([0081]). Claim 4. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 1, GAO discloses wherein the memory stores a first sub-tensor and a second sub-tensor of the target input tile, the second sub-tensor immediately follows the first sub-tensor, the step (C) processes the first sub-tensor and the second sub-tensor, and R is one ([0079],[0083]). Claim 5. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 4, GAO discloses wherein the first sub-tensor has a first channel dimension, the second sub-tensor has a second channel dimension, the step (B) reads the first sub-tensor and the second sub-tensor in response to an instruction, and a target number of channels of the instruction is greater than or equal to a sum of the first channel dimension and the second channel dimension ([0082],[0094],[0104]). Claim 6. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 5, GAO discloses wherein the first channel dimension is equal to the second channel dimension ([0098]). Claim 7. GAO and Yang disclose the method of claim 5, GAO discloses wherein both the first channel dimension and the second channel dimension are equal to a width of the memory divided by a data format of the input tensor ([0015]-[0016]). Claims 11-17 represent the processing unit of claims 1-9, respectively and are rejected along the same rationale Response to Arguments 7. Applicant’s arguments filed 11/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are moot in light of new ground of rejection(s). Conclusion 8. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 9. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (see PTOL-892). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Phenuel S. Salomon whose telephone number is (571) 270-1699. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. (Alternate Friday Off) EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Usmaan Saeed can be reached on (571) 272-4046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-3800. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHENUEL S SALOMON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2146
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602348
DATA ACTOR AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597486
DISEASE PREDICTION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586004
METHODS OF PREDICTING RELIABILITY INFORMATION OF STORAGE DEVICES AND METHODS OF OPERATING STORAGE DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572827
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) MODEL DEPLOYMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572249
DISPLAY DEVICE, EVALUATION METHOD, AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+18.3%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month