Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/087,715

MEDICAL CUTTING DEVICES WITH A STATIC CASING AND A BLADE WORKING BODY OF GREATER WIDTH AND RELATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Priority
Dec 22, 2021 — provisional 63/292,438
Examiner
IGBOKO, CHIMA U
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Innovations 4 Surgery LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
329 granted / 421 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +41% interview lift
Without
With
+40.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
465
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 421 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/29/26 has been entered. Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 06/29/26 has been entered. Claims 1 and 13 have been amended, and claim 12 has been cancelled. Claims 9-11 and 14-19 have been withdrawn. Claims 1-8 and 13 are addressed in the following office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-8 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Concerning claim 1, applicant’s original disclosure fails to divulge “the second end including a cutting component positioned entirely within the second plane”. Specifically, examiner is interpreting the second plane to be defined by the first and second protrusions thickness, and applicant’s disclosure fails to detail the numerical values of the thickness of the first and second protrusions and the cutting component, or that the first and second protrusions are the same thickness as the cutting component. So, it is unclear how the cutting component is positioned entirely within the second plane. Hence, the limitation is considered new matter. Claims 2-8 and 13 are rejected for the same reasons as claim 1 by virtue of dependency on claim 1. NO PRIOR ART REJECTION. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lark et al (US 2021/0186525) divulges claim 1 as substantially claimed, except for “the second end including a cutting component positioned entirely within the second plane”. Lark et al (US 2018/0199948) divulges claim 1 as substantially claimed, except for “the second end including a cutting component positioned entirely within the second plane”. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Chima Igboko whose telephone number is (571)272-8422. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9:00am-6:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Jackie Ho, at (571) 272-4696. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIMA U IGBOKO/Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Aug 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661218
HAPTIC OPTIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UTILIZING ROTATING CAMS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12622777
HAPTIC MANAGEMENT FOR SURGICAL IMPLANTS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611220
RECIPROCATING SERRATED BLADE FOR PRECISION DISSECTION
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599499
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR CREATING A CAPSULORHEXIS
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569362
DELIVERY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DELIVERY
5y 11m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+40.7%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 421 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month