Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/088,856

ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND WAFER PROCESSING TAPE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2022
Examiner
JOHNSTON, BRIEANN R
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allow Rate
491 granted / 1002 resolved
-16.0% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
1063
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1002 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on November 19, 2025 has been entered. Claims 1 and 7 have been amended. Claims 1, 2, 7 and 9 are currently pending and under examination. All previous rejections are withdrawn, as applicants have amended to limit the adhesive to containing 0.01-0.1 wt% of a sterically hindered amine-based compound of formulae (2A) and/or (2C); however, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is proposed below. The texts of those sections of Title 35 U.S. Code are not included in this section and can be found in a prior Office action. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanaki (US 2013/0115406). Hanaki teaches a wheel protective film including a base layer and a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer (Abstract), where the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is an acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive comprising a (meth)acrylic polymer and a cross-linking agent (p. 2, [0033]), where the cross-linking agent is specifically listed to include isocyanates (p. 4, [0061]-[0063]). Hanaki teaches the inclusion of a light stabilizer, specifically listed to include Uvinul 5050H (p. 6, [0077]). Uvinul 5050H is known in the art as meeting applicants’ Formula (2C), as evidenced by Schambony (p. 2, [0038]), and can absorb UV radiation with wavelengths ranging from 290-400 nm. While Hanaki does not describe Uvinul 5050H as a light absorber, the compound is the same as that claimed; therefore, the compound inherently meets the claimed limitation of a light absorber. Hanaki teaches the light stabilizer in an amount of 0.05-2 phr based on the solids of the acrylic polymer in the adhesive. Hanaki exemplifies the solids content of the adhesive as 20 wt% in Example 1, suggesting that the light stabilizer is present in an amount of 0.01-0.4 wt% based on the total adhesive composition, which overlaps with the claimed range of 0.01-0.1 wt%, and it has been held that overlapping ranges are sufficient to establish prima facie obviousness. See MPEP 2144.05. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have selected from the overlapping portion of the range taught by the reference because overlapping ranges have been held to establish prima facie obviousness. Hanaki is prima facie obvious over instant claims 1-2. Claims 7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hanaki (US 2013/0115406), as applied above to claims 1-2, and further in view of Schambony (US 2010/0160502). Hanaki is prima facie obvious over instant claims 1-2, as described above and applied herein as such, as Hanaki teaches an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive comprising a (meth)acrylic polymer, an isocyanate crosslinking agent and Uvinul 5050H as a lights stabilizer, which is known to absorb UV light with wavelengths of 290-400 nm and meets applicants’ Formula (2C). Hanaki does not teach or suggest the claimed combination of light absorbers, as claimed in instant claim 7. Schambony teaches stabilizer mixtures, teaching a combination of an oligomeric compound (A), exemplified as Uvinul 5050H with a formula of (Ia) (p. 2, [0038]) and a compound (B) with the formula (IIa) below, which meets applicants’ formula (2A), and is known in the art as Uvinul 4050H (p. 3, [0046]): PNG media_image1.png 200 350 media_image1.png Greyscale . Schambony teaches a combination of (Ia) and (IIa) (p. 3, [0056]), teaching that the combination has increased synergistic stabilizing action when compared to using either that of (Ia) or (IIa), alone, allowing for the use of a lesser amount of stabilizer when used as a combination (p. 1, [0007], p. 8, [0152] and p. 9, [0154]). Schambony teaches this stabilizer combination as suitable for stabilizing poly(meth)acrylate polymers (p. 8, [0136]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have used a combination of 0.01-0.4 wt% (or less) of Uvinul 5050H and Uvinul 4050H, in place of the Uvinul 5050H in Hanaki, as Schambony teaches that the combination has increased synergistic stabilizing action and allowing for the use of a lesser amount of stabilizer in total when used in combination compared to one compound, alone. Hanaki in view of Schambony is prima facie obvious over instant claim 7. As to claim 9, Uvinul 5050H and Uvinul 4050H absorb UV-A (320-400 nm) and UV-B (280-320 nm) rays. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the instant invention have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIEANN R JOHNSTON whose telephone number is (571)270-7344. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at (571)272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Brieann R Johnston/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 18, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 11, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599545
DENTAL ADHESIVE COMPOSITION, DENTAL ADHESIVE MATERIAL, AND DENTAL ADHESIVE MATERIAL PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595385
INKJET INKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577371
OXIDATIVELY CURABLE COATING COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570829
PIPE MADE OF PEROXIDE-CROSSLINKED POLYETHYLENE OF HIGH UV STABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570828
CHARCOAL PRODUCTS MADE WITH PHENOLIC RESIN BINDER AND METHODS FOR MAKING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+33.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1002 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month