Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/089,164

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FUEL CELL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 27, 2022
Examiner
DOMONE, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
497 granted / 592 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (KR101616201 (see attached Machine Translation)). Considering Claim 1, Lee discloses a system for controlling a fuel cell (fuel cell system and purge control method thereof [0001]), the system comprising: the fuel cell (fuel cell stack [0009]); a hydrogen purge valve (hydrogen purge valve [0008]) connected between the fuel cell and a hydrogen tank (hydrogen purge valve 175 controls opening and closing of hydrogen circulating through the hydrogen supply pipe 125, second water separator 162 [0009, Figure 1], hydrogen circulated from second water separator [0024], valve connected between separator and fuel cell stack 110 [Figure 1]) and configured to supply or cut off hydrogen to the fuel cell (hydrogen purge valve 175 controls opening and closing of hydrogen circulating through the hydrogen supply pipe 125, second water separator 162 [0009, Figure 1]); and a controller (fuzzy control method [0013], controller known component [0003]) configured to adjust an opening degree of the hydrogen purge valve (opening or closing of hydrogen purge valve [0010]) based on an accumulated current value of the fuel cell calculated in advance (hydrogen purge valve is set to maintain the valve open state for a certain period of time when the accumulated current of the fuel cell stack exceeds a set value [0027]) and control a flow rate of hydrogen (controls circulating of hydrogen [0010]). Claims 11 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Son (PGPub 2016/0079620). Considering Claim 11, Son discloses a method of controlling a fuel cell (hydrogen purging method for a fuel cell system [Abstract]), the method comprising: accumulating, by a controller, currents of the fuel cell to calculate an accumulated current value (controller configured to obtain every predetermined accumulation period, a variable purge charge amount that corresponds to a current stack operating state from a map [0020], purge period based on current accumulation of the stack [0011, 0020, 0055]); adjusting, by the controller, an opening degree of a hydrogen purge valve based on the calculated accumulated current value (hydrogen purge valve is opened or closed based on a purge charge amount depending on the determined operating state [Abstract] of current accumulation in real time [0055]); and controlling, by the controller, a flow rate of hydrogen (purge of hydrogen (flow) is controlled by controller [Abstract]). Considering Claim 20, Son discloses further calculating, by the controller, a purge duration of the hydrogen purge valve based on the calculated accumulated current value (opening time of hydrogen purge valve determined by controller based on calculated state [Abstract] of current accumulation in real time [0055]), wherein the controller includes adjusting, by the controller, the hydrogen purge valve for the calculated purge duration of the hydrogen purge valve and controlling, by the controller, the opening degree and an opening time for opening the hydrogen purge valve (opening time and open/close state determined by the controller [Abstract]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 and 12-19 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, cited reference Lee only discloses a general valve open state for when the accumulated current of the fuel cell stack exceeds a set value [0027, 0046]. There is no motivational teaching or configuration of an added duty ratio calculation unit configured to calculate a duty ratio of a pulse width modulation signal based on the calculated accumulated current value as required by the claim. Regarding claim 10, Lee discloses that a predetermined amount of time may be set to various for the open state such as the time needed for fresh fuel supply or to effectively remove moisture [0027]. However, there is no configuration or motivational teaching of an added time calculation unit of the controller configured to calculate a purge duration in response to the exceeded threshold. Regarding claim 12, Son only discloses that the hydrogen purge valve is opened or closed based on a purge charge amount depending on the determined operating state [Abstract] of current accumulation in real time [0055] from a map [0020]. There is no motivational teaching or configuration of an added method of calculating a duty ratio of a pulse width modulation signal based on the calculated accumulated current value as required by the claim. Further regarding Son, the purge valve 40 only serves as an exhaust purge through the rear end [0010, Figure 1], so there is no connection between the known hydrogen tank and the fuel cell as required by claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE whose telephone number is (571)270-7582. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at (571)272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P DOMONE/ Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600858
ION SELECTIVE MEMBRANES FOR ORGANIC ELECTROCHEMICAL PROCESSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603340
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603405
SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586801
COMPRESSOR AND COMPRESSOR CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580278
BATTERY CELL AND ELECTRIC APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month