Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/089,810

APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 28, 2022
Priority
May 06, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0056199
Examiner
NGUYEN, DONGHAI D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
679 granted / 899 resolved
+5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
919
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on August 18, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al (US12,355,011) in view U.S. Patent 6,623,579 to Smith et al. Regarding claims 1 and 8, Kim et al disclose an apparatus for manufacturing a display device, the apparatus comprising: a stage (not shown) on which a substrate (200) of the display device is disposed; a mold (110) including a surface including recessed portions (F); an injector (see Col. 7, lines 9-14) that applies an ink including light emitting elements on the surface of the mold (110, see Figs. 9-11); a doctor blade (140) that removes the ink disposed on the surface of the mold and remains the ink disposed in the recessed portions of the mold (see Fig. 10); and a compressor (not shown) that compresses the surface of the mold to the substrate (see Col. 13, lines 61- 64), except for wherein each of the recessed portions (F) includes a wider upper portion and a narrower lower portion; and each of the recessed portions includes an alignment hole having constant width and a step or an inclined surface connected to an upper end of the alignment hole. Smith et al disclose the mold (101/131/151/201/etc.) comprising each of the recesses portions includes an alignment hole having a constant width and a step or an inclined surface connected to an upper end of the alignment hole (see Figs. 3-8) for receiving electronic elements in a self-assembly manner (see Abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Kim et al by utilizing the alignment hole having configurations as taught by Smith et al for easily aligning the display elements into the recesses. Regarding claims 2-5, Kim et al disclose a depth of each of the recessed portions (F) is greater than a diameter of each of the light emitting elements (10), and the depth of each of the recessed portions is smaller than about 1.5 times of the diameter of each of the light emitting elements and each of the recessed portions includes an alignment hole (F) filled with at least one of the light emitting elements (10, see Fig. 12). Regarding claims 6-7, Kim et al disclose the doctor blade scrapes the ink in a direction on the surface of the mold (110), and the light emitting elements are disposed in an alignment form of the recessed portions having a lower surface of the alignment hole is substantially flat (see Figs. 10-12). Claims 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al in view of Smith et al and further in view of U.S. Patent Application 2018/0029038 to Sasaki et al. Kim/Smith et al as applied and relied above do not disclose a dryer that evaporates and removes a solvent of the ink remaining on the surface of the mold or on a surface of the substrate (claim 10); a vibrator that vibrates the mold to which the ink is applied wherein the vibrator is configured to vibrate the mold by generating a sound wave or an ultrasonic wave, and at least one of the light emitting elements is filled in each of the recessed portions by the vibrator and wherein in case that the mold and the substrate are separated, the vibrator is configured to vibrate the substrate (claims 11- 13) and an electric field generator that fixes a position of each of the light emitting elements by applying an electric field to the substrate in case that the mold and the substrate are separated. Sasaki et al teaching an apparatus for assembly micro- component onto a substrate, the apparatus having a dryer (heater, see Fig 13) a vibrator (1000, see Fig. 10A) and electric field generator (see Fig. 15) for aligning the light emitting elements (214) into the recess portion (208, see Fig. 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Kim/Smith et al by utilizing the dryer, vibrator and electric field generator as taught by Sasaki et for improving the alignment of the light emitting elements into the recess portions. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-8 and 10-14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONGHAI D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4566. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas J. Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DN/ /DONGHAI D NGUYEN/September 30, 2026 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Sep 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765314
CARRIER FOR PANELS
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12763539
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A STATUS OF AN ACTION PERFORMED BY A POWER TOOL
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750950
LASER FOLDED 3D ELECTRONICS
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749600
Rotary Braid Flaring System
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739980
CONNECTION STRUCTURE FOR YARN WIRE AND CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.0%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month