Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/090,540

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 29, 2022
Examiner
HARRISON, MONICA D
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
857 granted / 936 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 936 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-16, in the reply filed on 12/31/25 is acknowledged. Claims 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/31/25. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 9-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okuda et al (10,707,155 B2). Regarding claim 1, Okuda et al discloses a semiconductor device (Figures 4 and 5) comprising: a semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 51) having a partitioned region (Figure 5, reference 85) partitioned by a trench (Figure 5, reference 63); a field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76) which is formed on a main surface of the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 51) at an interval from the trench (Figure 5, reference 76) toward an inner side of the partitioned region (Figure 5, reference 85) and covers the partitioned region (Figure 5, reference 76); a trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72) formed at least in the trench (Figure 5, reference 71); an intermediate region (Figure 5, reference 78) annularly formed between the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76) on the main surface of the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 51) and the trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72; and a bridge insulating layer (Figure 4, reference 79) which is formed in the intermediate region (Figure 5, reference 78) and connects the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76) and the trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72), wherein the bridge insulating layer (Figure 4, reference 79) has a bridge buried portion buried in the main surface of the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 52). Regarding claim 2, Okuda et al discloses wherein the bridge insulating layer has a peripheral edge portion including a bird's beak (Figure 4, reference 79). Regarding claim 9, Okuda et al discloses further comprising: an interlayer insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 95) which is formed on the main surface of the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 52) and covers the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76) and the bridge insulating layer (Figure 4, reference 79), wherein the interlayer insulating layer has a thickness of 6,000 A or more and 10,000 A or less (Figure 5, reference 95). Regarding claim 10, Okuda et al discloses wherein the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76), the trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72), and the bridge insulating layer (Figure 4, reference 79) are formed by one insulating layer which extends continuously (column 11, lines 40-43). Regarding claim 11, Okuda et al discloses wherein an opening (Figure 5, reference 77) is formed in the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76). Regarding claim 12, Okuda et al discloses wherein the partitioned region (Figure 5, reference 85) is an active region including an insulated gate transistor (Figure 5, reference 90), and wherein a gate insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 84) of the insulated gate transistor (Figure 5, reference 90) is formed in the opening (Figure 5, reference 77) of the field insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 76). Regarding claim 13, Okuda et al discloses wherein the trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72) is formed in a film shape along an inner wall of the trench (Figure 5, reference 71) so as to partition a concave space within the trench (Figure 5, reference 71). Regarding claim 14, Okuda et al discloses further comprising: a buried layer (Figure 5, reference 73) buried in the concave space partitioned by the trench insulating layer (Figure 5, reference 72) within the trench (Figure 5, reference 71). Regarding claim 15, Okuda et al discloses wherein the buried layer (Figure 5, reference 73) contains polysilicon (column 10, lines 34-35). Regarding claim 16, Okuda et al discloses wherein the trench (Figure 5, reference 71) is formed in an annular shape in a plan view (column 30, lines 27-28) seen in a normal direction of the main surface of the semiconductor layer (Figure 5, reference 51). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose nor fairly suggest a semiconductor device comprising: wherein the trench insulating layer includes a trench inner covering portion covering an inner wall of the trench, and a field covering portion drawn out from the trench inner covering portion to the main surface of the semiconductor layer and connected to the field insulating layer via the bridge insulating layer, wherein the field covering portion has a first buried portion buried in the main surface of the semiconductor layer, wherein the field insulating layer has a second buried portion buried in the main surface of the semiconductor layer, and wherein the bridge buried portion, the first buried portion, and the second buried portion are formed by a single buried portion which is integrally continuous in a direction along the main surface of the semiconductor layer (claim 3) and wherein the semiconductor layer is in contact with a bottom of the bridge buried portion and has a low step surface having a step difference with respect to the main surface of the semiconductor layer, and wherein the step difference between the main surface of the semiconductor layer and the low step surface of the semiconductor layer is 1,000 A or more and 1,500 A or less (claim 8) further incorporated into independent claim 16 and in the context of its recited apparatus, along with its depending claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA D HARRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-1959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA D HARRISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 mdh January 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604505
SIC TRENCH MOSFET WITH AN EMBEDDED JUNCTION BARRIER SCHOTTKY DIODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598944
CHIP TRAY FOR SELF-ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD FOR SUPPLYING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT EMITTING ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598794
SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIAL, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598816
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598783
REDUCING PARASITIC CAPACITANCE IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+2.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 936 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month