Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/095,669

COIL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 11, 2023
Priority
May 10, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0057052
Examiner
BARNES, MALCOLM
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
389 granted / 480 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
500
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
61.7%
+21.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.6%
-12.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 480 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed on 01/11/2023 and 03/27/2026 has been considered. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species I: Figs. 1-3, claims 1-3, 6 and 8-22 without traverse in a response on 06/05/2026 has been previously acknowledged. Further, Claims 14, 15 and 17-22 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. In this Office Action, claims 14, 15 and 17-22 are withdrawn, and claims 1-3, 6, 8-13 and 16 are examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 15, the phrase “the first and second band-shaped external electrodes“ is not well defined since the phrase lacks antecedent basis. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6, 8-13 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Koizumi et al. (hereinafter Koizumi), U.S. Patent Application Publication 2022/0277889. Regarding Claim 1, Koizumi teaches, a coil component (Fig. 3) comprising: a body (10) having: first and second surfaces (15, 16) opposing each other and disposed to be perpendicular to a first direction, third and fourth surfaces (11, 12) opposing each other and connected to the first surface and the second surface, the third and fourth surfaces being disposed to be perpendicular to a second direction, and fifth and sixth surfaces (13, 14) opposing each other and connected to the first to fourth surfaces, the fifth and sixth surfaces being disposed to be perpendicular to a third direction, wherein a gap [interval] between the first surface and the second surface is greater than a gap between the third surface and the fourth surface and a gap between the fifth surface and the sixth surface (id.); a coil portion (30) disposed within the body and including a first lead-out portion (35) and a second lead-out portion (36) leading out to the first surface and the second surface of the body, respectively; a first external electrode (21) connected to the first lead- out portion and extending from the first surface of the body to the second surface of the body; and a second external electrode (22) connected to the second lead-out portion and extending from the second surface of the body to the first surface of the body, wherein the first and second external electrodes are spaced apart from each other in the second direction (id.). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0023], [0028], [0035]). Regarding Claim 2 and similarly claim 16, Koizumi further teaches, wherein the first and second lead-out portions are disposed in different locations in the second direction (id.). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0023], [0028], [0035]). Regarding Claim 3 and similarly claims 6 and 8, Koizumi further teaches, wherein the first and second external electrodes are disposed on the first surface and the second surface of the body, and the fifth surface and the sixth surface of the body (id.). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0023], [0028], [0035]). Regarding Claim 9, Koizumi further teaches, wherein the first to third directions are perpendicular to each other (id.). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0023], [0028], [0035]). Regarding Claim 11, Koizumi further teaches, wherein the gap [interval] between the third surface and the fourth surface is greater than the gap between the fifth surface and the sixth surface (“length dimension of the multilayer body is preferably equal to or more than 0.61 mm and preferably equal to or less than 0.91 mm” [0042], “height dimension of the multilayer body is preferably equal to or more than 0.61 mm, and preferably equal to or more than 0.91 mm” [0044]). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0042]-[0044]). Regarding Claim 12 and similarly claim 13, Koizumi further teaches, wherein a portion of the first surface is exposed (id.). (Koizumi: Figs. 1-3, para. [0023], [0028], [0035]). Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (US 20200402699). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if claim 10 is rewritten in independent form including all of the limitation of the base claims and any intervening claims. Claim 10 recites, inter alia, “…wherein a winding axis of the coil portion is parallel to the third direction”. (Emphasis added). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MALCOLM BARNES whose telephone number is (408)918-7512. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5:00 pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MALCOLM BARNES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837 8/06/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 11, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749612
COIL COMPONENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749618
A TAP CHANGER AND A TRANSFORMER ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING THE TAP CHANGER
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738414
COIL COMPONENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738413
MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731722
COIL COMPONENT
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.1%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 480 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month