Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/096,318

METHODS FOR GENERATING MELATONIN-RESPONSE-TUNED WHITE LIGHT WITH HIGH COLOR RENDERING

Final Rejection §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Priority
Jan 28, 2016 — continuation of PCTUS2016015441 +3 more
Examiner
TUMEBO, TSION M
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Korrus Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
537 granted / 808 resolved
-1.5% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
838
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 808 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The request for reconsideration filed on 03/04/2026 is acknowledged. Double Patenting Claims 1 and 3-21 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 10,701,776; 10,677,399; and 11,168,250.the basis for this rejection was previously set forth in detail in the Non-Final Office Action mailed on 11/04/2025. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 and 3-21 is maintained. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 3-21 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: this application includes all the allowable subject matters of U.S. patent No. 10,701,776. No prior art was found teaching individually, or suggesting in combination, all of the features of the applicant’s invention, as recited in claims 1 and 16 are not taught by prior arts. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding the Examiner’s nonstatutory double patenting rejection, the Applicant states that the Applicant will submit a terminal disclaimer once the claims are determined to be otherwise allowable. Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant has not filed a terminal disclaimer in response to the nonstatutory double patenting rejection and has not otherwise shown that the claims subject to the rejection are patentably distinct from the claims of the reference patent/application. Applicant’s statement that a terminal disclaimer will be filed at a later time does not overcome the outstanding rejection. See MPEP § 804. Accordingly, the nonstatutory double patenting rejection is maintained. Regarding the Examiner’s Claim objections, the Applicant requests reconsideration of the objection to claims 3–5 under 37 CFR 1.75(c), arguing that claims 3–5 originally depended from former claim 1 and were amended to depend from claim 16 after the subject matter of former claim 1 was incorporated into claim 16. Applicant further argues that the dependency will be corrected when the claims are placed in condition for allowance. Applicant’s arguments are persuasive. The dependency of claims 3–5 on claim 16 is clear in view of the amendments made during prosecution, and the issue can be addressed by appropriate renumbering of the claims when the application is placed in condition for allowance. MPEP § 608.01(n) provides that, where a claim refers to a numerically following claim, but the dependency is clear both as presented and as it will be renumbered at issue, the claims should be examined on the merits and no objection as to form need be made. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tsion Tumebo whose telephone number is 571-270-1668. The examiner can normally be reached on 7:30 am to 4:00 pm, Monday thru Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jong-Suk (James) Lee can be reached on (571)272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /TSION TUMEBO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Apr 14, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Aug 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Mar 04, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745715
LIGHT MODULE FOR PLANT CULTIVATION AND PLANT CULTIVATION APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742526
PORTABLE CHARGER FOR RECREATIONAL FLYING OBJECTS AND METHOD OF USE
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12716599
VENTILATING SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702521
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL LIGHTING
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681226
HOME APPLIANCE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+20.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 808 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month