Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/098,041

DUAL STRUCTURAL AND STORAGE APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jan 17, 2023
Examiner
EBNER, KATY MEYER
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
495 granted / 737 resolved
+15.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
756
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the second attachment devices are configured to be removably attachable to the first attachment devices”. However, as best understood from applicant’s disclosure, the second attachment devices are not capable of being attached to the previously recited first attachment devices. Rather, the second attachment devices are capable of being attached to the first attachment devices of a second housing, which is not recited in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 11 and 15 – 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hardie et al. (GB 2493572 A). As for claims 1 and 9, Hardie et al. disclose: a structural/storage system comprising: a plurality of storage elements (1a – 1d), each of the storage elements comprising: a housing comprising: an outer surface; an inner surface; and at least one opened end (Fig. 2); first attachment devices (3) disposed at the outer surface; and second attachment devices (4) disposed at the outer surface, wherein the second attachment devices of a first one of the plurality of storage elements are configured to be removably attachable to the first attachment devices of a second one of the plurality of storage elements. As for claims 2, 6, 10 and 15, Hardie et al. disclose: a cross-section of each housing/storage element is a polygon, namely a rectangle (Fig. 1). As for claims 3 and 11, Hardie et al. disclose the housings/storage elements providing structural support for an associated system (i.e., storage system for filing and sorting mail). As for claims 4 and 5, the housing of Hardie et al. is capable of receiving batteries with cooling channels therebetween. It is noted that a recitation of the intended use of the claimed invention (i.e., “configured to receive”) must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim. As for claims 7 and 16, Hardie et al. disclose: the first attachment devices are disposed on first and second orthogonally adjacent sides of the housing; and the second attachment devices are disposed on third and fourth orthogonally adjacent sides of the housing (see Fig. 2). As for claims 8 and 17, Hardie et al. disclose: beveled corners capable of receiving an adhesive (see Figs. 1 and 2). Claim(s) 9 – 15 and 18 – 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Valmet Automotive Solutions GmbH (DE 20 2019 104 441 U1). As for claims 9 and 18, Valmet discloses a system comprising: a load device; a power element configured to power the load device; and a plurality of storage elements, each of the storage elements comprising: a housing (16) comprising: an outer surface; an inner surface; and at least one opened end (Fig. 6); first attachment devices (54) disposed at the outer surface; and second attachment devices (56) disposed at the outer surface, wherein the second attachment devices of a first one of the plurality of storage elements are configured to be removably attachable to the first attachment devices of a second one of the plurality of storage elements. As for claims 10 and 15, Valmet discloses a cross-section of each storage element is a polygon, namely a rectangle, inasmuch as the cross-section disclosed by applicant (i.e., polygonal except for the attachment devices). As for claims 11, 12, and 19, Valmet discloses the storage elements providing structural support for an associated system, the system including a vehicle (see Abstract). As for claims 13, 14, 20, Valmet discloses an electric motor (see “motor vehicle”) and batteries having cooling channels (42) therebetween. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Katy M Ebner whose telephone number is (571)272-5830. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday, 10 a.m. - 3 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J. Allen Shriver can be reached at (303)297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Katy M Ebner/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12570133
BATTERY PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12539188
STABILIZER FOR MEDICAL CARTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533936
Resilient Coupling Element for a Motor Vehicle Having At Least One Coupling Element
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12516649
INTERCHANGEABLE INTAKE MANIFOLD ASSEMBLIES WITH INTERCHANGEABLE FLARE HOUSINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12515508
VEHICLE BODY BASE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month