Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/098,515

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED WING STRUCTURE HAVING A PLURALITY OF CHORDWISE WING SEGMENTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 18, 2023
Examiner
O'HARA, BRIAN M
Art Unit
3642
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Aevex Aerospace LLC
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
447 granted / 594 resolved
+23.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 594 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-7, 11, 28-31, 35, 41, 61 and 62 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Meeks (US 11353002 B2). Regarding Claim 1, Meeks discloses: 1. An airfoil structure for an aircraft, the airfoil structure comprising at least one airfoil segment and defining a cross-sectional airfoil shape, the airfoil structure comprising: at least two components (102 and 104) mated together and aligned along a chordwise direction (along A, See Fig. 2) of the cross-sectional airfoil shape (shape best shown in Fig. 1A), wherein: the chordwise direction extends from a leading edge (lower side of 100 in Fig. 1A) to a trailing edge (upper side of 100 in Fig. 1A) of the cross-sectional airfoil shape, the leading edge is at an extremity (inherent to L.E.) of the cross-sectional airfoil shape and defines a portion of the cross-sectional airfoil shape, the trailing edge is at an opposite extremity (inherent to T.E.) of the cross-sectional airfoil shape than the leading edge and defines a second portion of the cross-sectional airfoil shape, the at least two components combine to extend in the chordwise direction completely from the leading edge to the trailing edge (See Figs. 1A and 1B), each of the at least two components includes receiving apertures (102x and 106x) defined therein at one or more spanwise locations along a spanwise direction, the receiving apertures at each of the one or more spanwise locations aligned with each other in the chordwise direction, and the at least two components comprise: a first component (102A) that defines the leading edge of the cross-sectional airfoil shape; and a second component (102B) that defines the trailing edge of the cross-sectional airfoil shape; and a plurality of chordwise reinforcement elements (“multiple shafts”; Col 3 Line 66) extending through the aligned receiving apertures. 2. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of chordwise reinforcement elements are configured to exert a compressive force (via threads 13P) in the chordwise direction on the at least two components. 3. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein one component of the at least two components comprises an outer wall that defines a hollow interior extending along the spanwise direction, wherein the outer wall defines a plurality of receiving channels (23b), and wherein the airfoil structure further comprises a plurality of spanwise reinforcement elements (“for receiving a locking feature”; Col 6 Line 1) extending within the receiving channels of the one component. 5. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein the at least two components comprise: a monolithic front component (“in one continuous piece”; Col 1 Line 21) comprising a first joining surface, the front component at least partially defining the cross-sectional airfoil shape; and a monolithic second component (“in one continuous piece”; Col 1 Line 21) comprising a second joining surface mated to the first joining surface, wherein each of the first joining surface and the second joining surface extend from a pressure side of the cross-sectional airfoil shape to a suction side of the cross-sectional airfoil shape (from top to bottom of surfaces in Fig. 1B). 6. (Original) The airfoil structure of claim 5, wherein the first joining surface and the second joining surface are mated in a substantially face-to-face relationship (at 106a and 106b; See Fig. 1B). 7. (Original) The airfoil structure of claim 5, wherein the second joining surface comprises one or more surface portions mated in a substantially face-to-face relationship (at 106a and 106b) with one or more surface portions of the first joining surface. 11. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein the airfoil structure is selected from the group consisting of a wing (100 is a wing of a wind turbine), a horizontal tail, and a vertical tail. 61. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein the cross-sectional airfoil shape is defined at least at one of the one or more spanwise locations where the receiving apertures are defined (as shown in Fig. 1B). 62. (Previously Presented) The airfoil structure of claim 1, wherein the first component is monolithic and the second component is monolithic ((“in one continuous piece”; Col 1 Line 21). Method claims 28-31, 35, and 41 are rejected using the same elements and reasoning as recited for the apparatus claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 32, and 33 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN M O'HARA whose telephone number is (571)270-5224. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9AM - 5PM eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Huson can be reached at 571-270-5301. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN M O'HARA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3642
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 12, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12570398
MULTIPLE FLIGHT MODE AIRCRAFT ARCHITECTURES AND CONTROLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552526
ROTOR CONTROL FOR A CONVERTIBLE AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12552291
SAFETY SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545431
HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12545439
TILT DRIVE FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE VECTORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+20.0%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 594 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month