Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/100,875

METHOD OF MEDICAL NAVIGATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 24, 2023
Priority
Feb 04, 2022 — DE 102022102698.1
Examiner
MAHROUKA, WASSIM
Art Unit
2665
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Carl Zeiss AG
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
223 granted / 260 resolved
+23.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
281
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
70.4%
+30.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 260 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/18/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 5 recites “determining a first deviation…; and/or transforming the second image representation…;determining a second deviation…; and determining the three-dimensional representation…on the basis of the first and/or the second deviation” The scope of the claim is unclear because the recited and/or does not identify which complete sets of steps are alternative. In particular, it is unclear whether the claim requires: (1) transforming the first image representation and determining the first deviation; (2) transforming the second image representation and determining the second deviation; (3) one of or both of (1) and (2); (4) determining the second deviation regardless of whether the second transformation is performed or not. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art cannot determine with reasonable certainty which method steps are required by claim 5 as recited. Claim 6 recites the limitation ““adjustment of the information relating to the geometry of the marker”” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 separately recites information relating to the geometry if the marker but claim 6 chain of dependency does not depend from claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 7-16 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding claims 1 and 15: applicant amended the independent claims to include “the three-dimensional representation including a three-dimensional volume of the medical marker” The prior art including Marlet teaches determining 3D marker locations from multiple images and using those marker locations for comparison and registration. However, Marlet depicts fluoroscopic markers as line-like features and does not describe determining, from the first and second image representations, a three-dimensional representation that includes a 3D volume of the marker itself. A newly found reference Tokuda (US 20170000581) describes fiducials having volumetric shapes and volumetric modeling of fiducials in tomographic images data. However, the prior art of record fails to disclose, teach, or suggests determining the claimed 3D volume of the medical marker on the basis of the first and second image representations captured in difference perspectives, as required by the amended claims 1 and 15. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WASSIM MAHROUKA whose telephone number is (571)272-2945. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00-5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Koziol can be reached on (408) 918-7630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WASSIM MAHROUKA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Dec 09, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 09, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682985
COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR PROVIDING TRAINING DATA FOR A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR CLASSIFYING PLANTS INFESTED WITH A PATHOGEN
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682598
CONTROL APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD EXECUTED BY IMAGE CAPTURE SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682683
METHOD FOR PREVENTING HAND GESTURE MISRECOGNITION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670715
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIDEO ANALYSIS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664848
FACE AUTHENTICATION METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month