Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/103,618

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 31, 2023
Examiner
ANDERSON, MARGARET MARIE
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
30 granted / 44 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
80
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 44 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Case This communication is in response to applicant’s 09/15/2025 amendment(s) /response(s) in the Application 18/103,618 by LU for “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE”, filed on 01/31/2023. The amendment/response to the claims has been entered: Claims 1, 8 and 14 are currently amended. Therefore, claims 1-20 are now pending. This rejection is FINAL. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 09/15/2025, hereinafter “Remarks”, have been fully considered and they are persuasive in part, as described below: Applicants have amended the title to be: “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND DEVICE COMBINING DRX WITH D2D COMMUNICATION”. Therefore, the objection to the title has been withdrawn. With respect to the Section 102 Rejection, Applicant’s Remarks” have been fully considered but they are not persuasive for the following reasons: Applicants assert, on page 7 of the Remarks, that “It can be seen that the SL DRX configuration in DI GIROLAMO et al is selected based on selection parameters including service type, device class and the like, but the DRX configuration in the present invention corresponds to the message to be received before establishing the connection between terminals. Thus, DI GIROLAMO et al at most recites that the SL communication is carried out based on the SL DRX configuration, and the discovery messages are monitored based on the DRX configuration, but is silent about the above-identified features, which require receiving, based on the DRX configuration corresponding to the message, the message that is to be received before establishing the connection between terminals.” Examiner respectfully disagrees. As described in the rejections below, DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 343, 344, paragraphs 417, 500, teach that in response to the configuration (i.e. the DRX configuration parameters received in step 341), communicating over a plurality of SL communications using the configuration for the SL DRX (i.e. establishing a connection (e.g. SL DRX connection) between terminal devices)). As such, the DRX configuration message is received prior to establishing the SL DRX connection, which based on the configuration message. Response to Amendment Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 5, 7-9, 12, 14-15, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by DI GIROLAMO et al. (US20230014303A1), hereinafter DI GIROLAMO. Regarding claim 1, DI GIROLAMO teaches A wireless communication method, comprising: receiving a first message based on a first discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration corresponding to the first message, (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach receiving one or more discovery messages comprising one or more DRX configurations (i.e. first message based on a first DRX configuration corresponding to the first message).) wherein the first message is a message that is to be received before establishing a connection between terminal devices. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 343, 344, paragraphs 417, 500, teach that in response to the configuration (i.e. the DRX configuration parameters received in step 341), communicating over a plurality of SL communications using the configuration for the SL DRX (i.e. establishing a connection (e.g. SL DRX connection) between terminal devices)).) Regarding claim 2, DI GIROLAMO teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first message comprises a device discovery message. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach the first message as a discovery message (i.e. device discovery message).) Regarding claim 5, DI GIROLAMO teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: determining a time resource corresponding to the first DRX configuration based on at least one synchronization source. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 23A, step 304, paragraphs 118, 406, teach a time resource (e.g. start time) corresponding the first DRX configuration based on a synchronization source (timing reference).) Regarding claim 7, DI GIROLAMO teaches the method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the method is applied in device-to-device (D2D) communication. (DI GIROLAMO, paragraph 433 teaches LTE and LTE-A technology may include LTE D2D and V2X technologies and interfaces (such as Sidelink communications, etc.) Regarding claim 8, DI GIROLAMO teaches A wireless communication method, characterized in comprising: sending a first message based on a first discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration corresponding to the first message, (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach sending one or more discovery messages comprising one or more DRX configurations (i.e. first message based on a first DRX configuration corresponding to the first message).) wherein the first message is a message that is to be received before establishing a connection between terminal devices. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 343, 344, paragraphs 417, 500, teach that in response to the configuration (i.e. the DRX configuration parameters received in step 341), communicating over a plurality of SL communications using the configuration for the SL DRX (i.e. establishing a connection (e.g. SL DRX connection) between terminal devices)).) Regarding claim 9, DI GIROLAMO teaches the method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the first message comprises a device discovery message. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach the first message as a discovery message (i.e. device discovery message).) Regarding claim 12, DI GIROLAMO teaches the method as claimed in claim 8, further comprising: determining a time resource corresponding to the first DRX configuration based on at least one synchronization source. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 23A, step 304, paragraphs 118, 406, teach a time resource (e.g. start time) corresponding the first DRX configuration based on a synchronization source (timing reference).) Regarding claim 14, DI GIROLAMO teaches A terminal device, characterized in comprising: a processor, a memory and a transceiver, wherein the memory is configured to store a computer program, and the processor is configured to invoke and run the computer program stored in the memory to: (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 26F, paragraph 496 teach that any or all of the apparatuses, systems, methods and processes described herein may be embodied in the form of computer executable instructions (e.g., program code) stored on a computer-readable storage medium which instructions, when executed by a processor, such as processors 118 or 91, cause the processor to perform or implement the systems, methods and processes described herein.) receive, through the transceiver, a first message based on a first discontinuous reception (DRX) configuration corresponding to the first message, (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach receiving one or more discovery messages comprising one or more DRX configurations (i.e. first message based on a first DRX configuration corresponding to the first message).) wherein the first message is a message that is to be received before establishing a connection between terminal devices. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 343, 344, paragraphs 417, 500, teach that in response to the configuration (i.e. the DRX configuration parameters received in step 341), communicating over a plurality of SL communications using the configuration for the SL DRX (i.e. establishing a connection (e.g. SL DRX connection) between terminal devices)).) Regarding claim 15, DI GIROLAMO teaches the terminal device as claimed in claim 14, wherein the first message comprises a device discovery message. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 24, steps 341, 342, paragraphs 417, 500, teach the first message as a discovery message (i.e. device discovery message).) Regarding claim 18, DI GIROLAMO teaches the terminal device as claimed in claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to: determine a time resource corresponding to the first DRX configuration based on at least one synchronization source. (DI GIROLAMO, Fig. 23A, step 304, paragraphs 118, 406, teach a time resource (e.g. start time) corresponding the first DRX configuration based on a synchronization source (timing reference).) Regarding claim 20, DI GIROLAMO teaches the terminal device as claimed in claim 14, wherein the method is applied in device-to-device (D2D) communication. (DI GIROLAMO, paragraph 433 teaches LTE and LTE-A technology may include LTE D2D and V2X technologies and interfaces (such as Sidelink communications, etc.) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-4, 10-11 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DI GIROLAMO et al. (US20230014303A1), hereinafter DI GIROLAMO, in view of Zhang et al. (US20230284332A1), hereinafter ZHANG. Regarding claim 3, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 1 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe wherein the first message corresponds to a first identifier, and the first identifier corresponds to the first DRX configuration. ZHANG in the same field of endeavor teaches wherein the first message corresponds to a first identifier, and the first identifier corresponds to the first DRX configuration. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID (i.e., identifier).) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure a first identifier as corresponding to a first DRX configuration. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 4, DI GIROLAMO in view of ZHANG teaches the method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the first identifier is a layer-2 address. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID as a layer 2 address.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure the first identifier is a layer-2 address. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 10, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 8 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe wherein the first message corresponds to a first identifier, and the first identifier corresponds to the first DRX configuration. ZHANG in the same field of endeavor teaches wherein the first message corresponds to a first identifier, and the first identifier corresponds to the first DRX configuration. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID (i.e., identifier).) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure a first identifier as corresponding to a first DRX configuration. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 11, DI GIROLAMO in view of ZHANG teaches the method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the first identifier is a layer-2 address. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID as a layer 2 address.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure the first identifier is a layer-2 address. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 16, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 14 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe wherein the first message corresponds to a first identifier, and the first identifier corresponds to the first DRX configuration. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID (i.e., identifier).) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure a first identifier as corresponding to a first DRX configuration. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 17, DI GIROLAMO in view of ZHANG teaches the terminal device as claimed in claim 16, wherein the first identifier is a layer-2 address. (ZHANG, paragraph 53 teaches DRX configuration comprising information such as a layer 2 ID as a layer 2 address.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of ZHANG with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure the first identifier is a layer-2 address. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6, 13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over DI GIROLAMO et al. (US20230014303A1), hereinafter DI GIROLAMO, in view of Hahn et al. (US20230164873A1), hereinafter HAHN. Regarding claim 6, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 1 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe further comprising: receiving indication information, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. HAHN teaches further comprising: receiving indication information, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. (HAHN, Fig. 7, steps 720, 730, paragraph 102, teach receiving a SCI comprising DRX configuration information which is included in to-be-transmitted data via sidelink communications.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of HAHN with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure indication information, and the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 13, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 8 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe sending indication information, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. HAHN teaches sending indication information, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. (HAHN, Fig. 7, steps 720, 730, paragraph 102, teach sending a SCI comprising DRX configuration information which is included in to-be-transmitted data via sidelink communications.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of HAHN with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure indication information, and the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Regarding claim 19, although DI GIROLAMO teaches all the limitations with respect to claim 14 above, DI GIROLAMO does not describe wherein the processor is further configured to: receive indication information through the transceiver, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. HAHN teaches wherein the processor is further configured to: receive indication information through the transceiver, wherein the indication information is used for indicating that the first message is not included or is included in to-be-transmitted data. (HAHN, Fig. 7, steps 720, 730, paragraph 102, teach receiving a SCI comprising DRX configuration information which is included in to-be-transmitted data via sidelink communications.) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to combine the teachings of HAHN with the teachings of DI GIROLAMO to configure the first identifier is a layer-2 address. The motivation would be to allow for efficiently implementing DRX for sidelink transmissions and other types of D2D transmissions (ZHANG, paragraph 8). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WALLI Z BUTT whose telephone number is (571)272-5822. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00 AM - 5.30 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHARLES JIANG can be reached on 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WALLI Z. BUTT Primary Examiner Art Unit 2412 /WALLI Z BUTT/Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 15, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593332
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INSTRUCTING TO TRANSMIT DATA, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574958
ENERGY DETECTION THRESHOLD FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12549232
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12532256
AP GROUPING FOR FAST MOVING ROAMING ALONG A PATHWAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12526221
Communication Method, UP Device, and CP Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+18.2%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 44 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month