Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/105,568

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING SIDELINK TRANSMISSION

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 03, 2023
Priority
Aug 06, 2020 — continuation of PCTCN2020107329
Examiner
HENSON, JAMAAL R
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
6 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
689 granted / 815 resolved
+26.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
870
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 10, 12, and 15-16, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. With regard to independent claim 1, it has been amended to recite, in part: “in response to failing to decode a data packet of the HARQ process, starting a sidelink DRX retransmission timer of the HARQ process at expiration of the sidelink DRX HARQ RTT timer, and determining that DRX is not used for a sidelink communication link between the first user equipment and the second user equipment during running of the sidelink DRX retransmission timer” The office note that the specification as filed does not provide adequate written description for the underlined portion of the claim, “and determining that DRX is not used for a sidelink communication link between the first user equipment and the second user equipment during running of the sidelink DRX retransmission timer”. Although par.[0038] recites, in part: “In the event that the UE 102 fails to decode a received data packet corresponding to a HARQ process, the UE 102 may start a sidelink DRX retransmission timer, e.g., drx-RetransmissionTimerRxSL, of the HARQ process when the sidelink DRX HARQ RTT timer of the HARQ process is expired. In this case, the UE 102 may assume that DRX is not used for the sidelink communication link during running of the sidelink DRX retransmission timer.” Although the UE may assume that DRX is not used for the sidelink communication link, the determination is an assumption, and not a clear cut determining that the DRX is not configured. Additionally, in order to satisfy the written description requirement the applicants specification must describe the claimed invention in sufficient detail that one skilled in the art can reasonably conclude that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention as of the effective filing date. The UE assuming that a DRX is not configured, while stated in the specification, does not adequately describe how the UE can determine based on the assumption that DRX is not configured, that a DRX is not configured. The question arises, then, how does the UE make the determination? This is not adequately described in the specification and the claims are rejected. Additionally, claims 2-7, 10, 12, and 15-16, are rejected for their dependency on claim 1, and for failing to cure the deficiencies therein. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMAAL HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5339. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thu: 7:30 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMAAL HENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2411 /JAMAAL HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 09, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706851
Systems and Methods for Link State Flooding Transmitter-Based Flow Control
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695557
FULL-DUPLEX OPERATIONS FOR USER EQUIPMENTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684485
ENHANCED WAKE-UP SIGNAL HANDLING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676718
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677348
DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION DETERMINING METHOD AND DEVICE, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.8%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month