Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/108,219

VACUUM INSULATOR IN A STOREHOUSE AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 10, 2023
Priority
Dec 15, 2015 — RE 10-2015-0179480 +3 more
Examiner
BANKS, KEONA LAUREN
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
16 granted / 29 resolved
-14.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
81.4%
+41.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 29 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims The Office Action is in response to the remarks and amendments filed on 1/22/2026. Claims 2 and 11-14 are cancelled. Claims 21-22 are new. The objections to the drawings have been withdrawn in light of the amendments filed. The objections to the Specification have been withdrawn in light of the amendments filed. The rejections pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 112(a) have been withdrawn in light of the amendments filed. The rejections pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been withdrawn in light of the amendments filed. Accordingly, claims 1, 3-10 and 16-22 are pending for consideration in this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6, 9, 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding Claim 6, the recitation of “a thermoelectric module placing portion” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, claim 1 also recites “a thermoelectric module placing portion”. Therefore, it is unclear to which placing portion the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Regarding Claim 9, the recitation of “a thermoelectric module placing portion” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, claim 1 also recites “a thermoelectric module placing portion”. Therefore, it is unclear to which placing portion the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Regarding Claim 16, the recitation of “the supporting unit” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, amended claim 15 clarifies the supporting unit has a first supporting unit and a second supporting unit. Therefore, it is unclear to which supporting unit the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Regarding Claim 17, the recitation of “the supporting unit” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, amended claim 15 clarifies the supporting unit has a first supporting unit and a second supporting unit. Therefore, it is unclear to which supporting unit the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Further Regarding Claim 17, the recitation of “a heat diffusion block” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, amended claim 15 also recites “a heat diffusion block”. Therefore, it is unclear to which heat diffusion block the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. For examination purposes, the recitation “a heat diffusion block” is interpreted as - - the heat diffusion block - - for clarity. Regarding Claim 18, the recitation of “a first supporting unit” and “a second supporting unit” has insufficient antecedent basis for the limitations in the claims. In particular, claim 15 also recites “a first supporting unit” and “a second supporting unit. Therefore, it is unclear to which supporting units the claim is referring. Therefore, the claims are indefinite and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. For examination purposes, the recitation “a first supporting unit and a second supporting unit” is interpreted as - - the first supporting unit and the second supporting unit - - for clarity. . Claims 19 and 20 are rejected based on dependency from a rejected claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the application: Claim 10 and 15-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Culp et al. (US20060000221A1). Regarding Claim 10, Culp discloses an insulated storage [container 20, Figure 1; 0024], comprising: a first plate [a first plate, annotated Figure 4]; a second plate [a second plate, annotated Figure 4]; a vacuum space provided between the first plate and the second plate [where the insulated container 22 may include insulation formed from vacuum panels; 0025]; a supporting unit [thermoelectric unit 30 , Figure 2] provided to support the vacuum space [where thermal tape 44 may be provided so as to ensure close contact between the thermal tape 44 and the internal sides of the hole 28 and to minimize heat leakage; 0032]; and a thermoelectric module [thermoelectric module 36, Figure 3] that exchanges heat with the second plate [via side heat sink 34, Figure 4], wherein the first plate or the second plate includes a first portion extending in a first direction [hole 28, Figure 2], wherein the supporting unit includes a portion extending in the first direction [where the opening in insulation 42 of thermoelectric unit 30 aligns with hole 28, Figure 2; a first direction, annotated Figure 4], wherein the supporting unit includes a first supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62] and a second supporting unit [insulation 42, Figure 3] provided not to be integrated with the first supporting unit [where fan covers 60 and 62 are not integral with the thermoelectric unit 30, as in the fan covers 60 and 62 and thermoelectric 30 are separable and not one piece; 0046], wherein the second supporting unit includes a first supporting unit placing portion [where the opening in thermoelectric unit 30 aligns with hole 28, Figure 2 and annotated Figure 4], and wherein the first supporting unit placing portion is provided so that at least a part of the first supporting unit is placed open with respect to the second supporting unit without being covered by the second supporting unit [where thermoelectric module 36 is surrounded by insulation 42; 0032; where thermoelectric module 36 is not covered by insulation 42 in the direction of a first direction, Figure 3 and annotated Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 15, Culp discloses an insulated storage [container 20, Figure 1; 0024] comprising: a first plate [a first plate, annotated Figure 4]; a second plate [a second plate, annotated Figure 4]; a vacuum space provided between the first plate and the second plate [where the insulated container 22 may include insulation formed from vacuum panels; 0025]; a supporting unit [thermoelectric unit 30 , Figure 2] provided to support the vacuum space [where thermal tape 44 may be provided so as to ensure close contact between the thermal tape 44 and the internal sides of the hole 28 and to minimize heat leakage, Figure 4; 0032]; and a thermoelectric module [thermoelectric module 36, Figure 3] that exchanges heat with the second plate [via side heat sink 34, Figure 4]; and a heat diffusion block [conductive block 38, Figure 4] that exchanges heat with the thermoelectric module [Figure 4; 0030], wherein the first plate or the second plate includes a first portion extending in a first direction [hole 28, Figure 2 and annotated Figure 4], and wherein the supporting unit includes a portion extending in the first direction [where conductive block 38 and thermoelectric module 36 are inside insulation 42, Figure 3 and annotated Figure 4], and wherein the supporting unit includes: a first supporting unit [insulation 42, Figure 3] provided on a portion on which the thermoelectric module and the heat diffusion block are provided [where conductive block 38 and thermoelectric module 36 are inside insulation 42 in hole 28, Figure 3 and annotated Figure 4]; and a second supporting unit [fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] provided on a portion facing the first plate and the second plate [where fan cover 62 covers hole 28 on the exterior of container 22, first plate, where fan cover 60 covers hole 28 on the interior of container 22, second plate, Figure 2 and annotated Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 16, Culp discloses the invention of claim 15 and further discloses where the supporting unit [thermoelectric unit 30, Figure 2] includes a thermoelectric module placing portion [where thermoelectric module 36 is surrounded by insulation 42, Figure 3], wherein the thermoelectric module placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the thermoelectric module is placed open with respect to the supporting unit without being covered by the supporting unit [where insulation 42 does not cover thermoelectric module the front and back of the thermoelectric module 36 in the first direction, annotated Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 17, Culp discloses the invention of claim 15 and further discloses where a heat diffusion block [conductive block 38, Figure 3] that exchanges heat with the thermoelectric module [where the thermally conductive block 38 is utilized to transfer heat between the thermoelectric module 36 and the cold side heat sink 40, Figure 4; 0030], wherein the supporting unit includes a heat diffusion block placing portion [where the thermally conductive block 38 attaches to one side of thermoelectric module 36 and is surrounded by insulation 42 as well, Figure 3 and Figure 4], wherein the heat diffusion block placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the heat diffusion block is placed open with respect to the supporting unit without being covered by the supporting unit [where insulation 42 does not cover thermoelectric module the front and back of the conductive block 38 in the first direction, annotated Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 18, Culp discloses the invention of claim 17 and further discloses where the supporting unit [thermoelectric unit 30 , Figure 2] includes a first supporting unit [insulation 42, Figure 3] and a second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62] not to be integrated with from the first supporting unit [where fan covers 60 and 62 are not integral with the thermoelectric unit 30, as in the fan covers 60 and 62 and thermoelectric 30 are separable and not one piece; 0046]. Regarding Claim 19, Culp discloses the invention of claim 18 and further discloses where the second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] includes a first support plate [side fan cover 62, Figure 2] and a second support plate [side fan cover 60, Figure 2] disposed farther from the thermoelectric module than the first support plate [where thermoelectric module 36 is closer to the side fan cover 62, Figure 2 and Figure 3]. Regarding Claim 20, Culp discloses the invention of claim 18 and further discloses wherein the second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] includes a first support plate [cover 62, Figure 2] and a second support plate [cover 60, Figure 2] disposed farther from the first plate [annotated Figure 4] than the first support plate [where the first plate is on the exterior of side of insulated container 22, annotated Figure 4; where fan cover 62 is on the exterior of container 22 and fan cover 60 is on the interior of the container 22, Figure 2; 0045]. Regarding Claim 21, Culp discloses the invention of claim 1 and discloses where the thermoelectric module [thermoelectric module 36, Figure 3] has a structure in which semiconductors having different polarities [where a typical thermoelectric module is manufactured with a series of proton (P) and neutron (N) doped bismuth-telluride semiconductor materials sandwiched between them, where the N type material has an excess of electrons and the P type material has a deficit of electrons; 0007] are connected in series to each other [where one P and one N make a couple and the thermoelectric couples in a thermoelectric module are connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel; 0007]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Culp et al. (US20060000221A1). Regarding Claim 1, Culp discloses an insulated storage [container 20, Figure 1; 0024], comprising: a first plate to have a first temperature [a first plate of side 26, annotated Figure 4, where insulation has sufficient thermal insulating qualities to reduce heat loss; 0025, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize a temperature differential between the interior and exterior of container 22 ]; a second plate to have a second temperature that is different from the first temperature [a second plate of side 26, annotated Figure 4, where insulation has sufficient thermal insulating qualities to reduce heat loss; 0025, where one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize a temperature differential between the interior and exterior of container 22]; a vacuum space provided between the first plate and the second plate [where the insulated container 22 may include insulation formed from vacuum panels; 0025] to have a temperature between the first temperature and the second temperature [where the insulation preferably has sufficient thermal insulating qualities so that an insignificant amount of heat is lost though the sides 26 and top 24 of the insulated container 22; 0025, where one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize a thermal gradient is maintained between the first and second wall]; a supporting unit [thermoelectric unit 30 , Figure 2] provided to support the vacuum space [where thermal tape 44 may be provided so as to ensure close contact between the thermal tape 44 and the internal sides of the hole 28 and to minimize heat leakage, Figure 4; 0032]; and a thermoelectric module [thermoelectric module 36, Figure 3] that exchanges heat with the second plate [via side heat sink 34, Figure 4], wherein the first plate and the second plate includes a first portion [hole 28, Figure 2 and annotated Figure 4] extending in a first direction [a direction extending through side 26, annotated Figure 4], wherein the supporting unit includes a portion [where conductive block 38 and thermoelectric module 36 are inside insulation 42, Figure 3] extending in the first direction [where the opening in insulation 42 of thermoelectric unit 30 aligns with hole 28, Figure 2], and wherein the supporting unit includes a first supporting unit [insulation 42, Figure 3] and a second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62] provided not to be integrated with the first supporting unit [where fan covers 60 and 62 are not integral with the thermoelectric unit 30, as in the fan covers 60 and 62 and thermoelectric 30 are separable and not one piece; 0046], wherein the first supporting unit includes a thermoelectric module placing portion [where the opening in thermoelectric unit 30 aligns with hole 28, Figure 2 and annotated Figure 4], and wherein the thermoelectric module placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the thermoelectric module is not covered by the first supporting unit and is placed open with respect to the first supporting unit [where thermoelectric module 36 is surrounded by insulation 42; 0032; where thermoelectric module 36 is not covered by insulation 42 in the direction of a first direction, Figure 3 and annotated Figure 4]. Regarding Claim 3, Culp discloses the invention of claim 1 and further discloses wherein the second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] includes a first support plate [side fan cover 62, Figure 2] and a second support plate [side fan cover 60, Figure 2] disposed farther from the thermoelectric module than the first support plate [where thermoelectric module 36 is closer to the side fan cover 62, Figure 2 and Figure 3]. Regarding Claim 5, Culp discloses the invention of claim 1 and further teaches where the second supporting unit [fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] includes a first support plate [fan cover 62, Figure 2] and a second support plate [fan cover 60, Figure 2] disposed farther from the first plate than the first support plate [where first plate is on the exterior of side of insulated container 22, annotated Figure 1; where fan cover 62 is on the exterior of container 22 and fan cover 60 is on the interior of the container 22, Figure 2; 0045]. Regarding Claim 6, Culp discloses the invention of claim 3 and further discloses where the first support plate [cover 62, Figure 2] includes a thermoelectric module placing portion [where fan cover 62 attaches to the thermoelectric unit 30; 0046; and covers the hole 28 for thermoelectric unit 30, Figure 2], and wherein the thermoelectric module placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the thermoelectric module is placed open with respect to the first support plate without being covered by the first support plate [where the fan cover include venting openings, Figure 2]. Regarding Claim 7, Culp discloses the invention of claim 3 and further discloses a heat diffusion block [conductive block 38, Figure 4] that exchanges heat with the thermoelectric module [Figure 4; 0030], wherein the first support plate [fan cover 62, Figure 2] includes a heat diffusion block placing portion [where conductive block 38 is a part of thermoelectric unit 30, Figure 3; where fan cover 62 attaches to the thermoelectric unit 30; 0046; and covers the hole 28 for thermoelectric unit 30, Figure 2], wherein the heat diffusion block placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the heat diffusion block is placed open with respect to the first support plate without being covered by the first support plate [where the fan cover 62 include venting openings, Figure 2]. Regarding Claim 8, Culp discloses the invention of claim 3 and further teaches where the first support plate [fan cover 62, Figure 2] includes a first supporting unit placing portion [where fan cover 62 covers hole 28 and entire thermoelectric unit 30 including insulation 42, Figure 2], wherein the first supporting unit placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the first supporting unit is placed open with respect to the first supporting plate without being covered by the first supporting plate [where the fan cover 62 include venting openings, Figure 2]. Regarding Claim 9, Culp discloses the invention of claim 3 and further teaches where the second support plate [fan cover 60, Figure 2] includes a thermoelectric module placing portion [where fan cover 60 covers hole 28 and thermoelectric unit 30 including thermoelectric module 36, Figure 2], wherein the thermoelectric module placing portion is provided so that at least a portion of the thermoelectric module is placed open with respect to the second support plate without being covered by the second support plate [where the fan cover 60 include venting openings, Figure 2; 0044]. Claims 4 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Culp et al. (US20060000221A1) as applied to claim 1 above and in further view of Corini (US3823567A). Regarding Claim 4, Culp, discloses wherein the second supporting unit [side fan covers 60 and 62, Figure 2] includes a first support plate [side fan cover 62, Figure 2] and a second support plate [side fan cover 60, Figure 2], and does not teach a bar. However, Corini teaches a vacuum insulated container [col. 1, lines 5-10] including a bar [spacers 18, Figure 2; col. 2, lines 34-44] where one of ordinary skill in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods and that in combination, each element would perform the same function as it did separately and one of ordinary skills would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable i.e., maintain spacing between walls when evacuated to for a vacuum barrier [Corini; col. 2, lines 34-44] Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the assembly of Culp to have a bar in view of the teachings of Corini where the elements could have been combined by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded predictable results i.e., maintain spacing between walls when evacuated to for a vacuum barrier [Corini; col. 2, lines 34-44] Regarding Claim 22, Culp discloses a storehouse [container 20, Figure 1] comprising: a main body [insulated container 22, Figure 1] having a space in which articles are stored [formed by sides 26, top 24 and a bottom (not shown); 0024, Figure 1] and at least one external opening [at top 24, Figure 1]; a door provided for a user to open and close the at least one external opening of the main body [where top 24 serves as a lid; 0025, Figure 1]; and wherein the main body and the door are provided as or with the insulated 12 storage according to claim 1 [refer to the rejection of claim 1 above]. Culp does not teach the storehouse is for a vehicle, where a fitting part is provided for positioning the main body when the main body is mounted in the vehicle. However, Corini teaches a storehouse [a vacuum insulated container 10, Figure 1, col. 1, lines 5-10] for a vehicle [where in transit, the D.C. current can be supplied from the generator of the vehicle within which the container is disposed; col. 4, lines 21-29], where a fitting part is provided for positioning the main body when the main body is mounted in the vehicle [where the container is positioned on legs as seen with DC and AC connectors in Figure 1] where one of ordinary skill in the art would have been capable of applying this known technique to a known device that was ready for improvement and the results would have been predictable to one of ordinary skill in the art i.e., maintain the temperature of products, both while they are being transported, say for example, in a train, and while they are being stored [Corini; col. 1, lines 10-14]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the assembly of Culp have to have where the storehouse is for a vehicle, where a fitting part is provided for positioning the main body when the main body is mounted in the vehicle in view of the teachings of Corini where this known technique could have been applied to a known device that was ready for improvement and the results would have been predictable i.e., maintain the temperature of products, both while they are being transported, say for example, in a train, and while they are being stored [Corini; col. 1, lines 10-14]. PNG media_image1.png 681 1003 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 1/22/2026 with respect to claim 1 on pages 15-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant’s arguments filed 1/22/2026 with respect to claim 10 on page 18 has been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant’s arguments filed 1/22/2026 with respect to claim 15 on page 18 has been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant does not separately argue the rejection of claims 3-9 and 16-20 except for their dependence upon claim 1 and 15. Accordingly, the rejections of record are considered proper and remain. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Nelson (US5505046A) discloses a thermoelectric refrigerator with enhanced insulation. Taniguchi (JP2003202183A) discloses a cooler/warming cabinet that uses a thermoelectric module. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEONA LAUREN BANKS whose telephone number is (571)270-0426. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30- 5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerry-Daryl Fletcher can be reached at 5712705054. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEONA LAUREN BANKS/Examiner, Art Unit 3763 /ELIZABETH J MARTIN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674627
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HEAT TRANSFER USING HEAT PIPES
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12624845
AIR CONDITIONER, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AIR CONDITIONER, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622441
MAGNETIC FIELD FRESHNESS-PRESERVING STORAGE CONTAINER AND REFRIGERATOR
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612975
Multi-Way Coolant Valve and Heat Pump System Having the Same
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12607305
HYDROGEN SUPPLY MODULE AND HYDROGEN SUPPLY METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (-6.5%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 29 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month