Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/109,444

METHOD FOR PREPARING ALKYL CARBOXYLIC ACID ESTER AND APPARATUS FOR PREPARING ALKYL CARBOXYLIC ACID ESTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Examiner
SINGH, PREM C
Art Unit
1771
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Gs Caltex Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
210 granted / 356 resolved
-6.0% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
360
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
70.1%
+30.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 356 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 (line 7 says, “a separator….and line 11-12 says, a distillation column…. Obviously, these two units are the same, therefore, a consistent term should be used. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al (US 8,895,765 B2). With respect to claims 1 and 2, Kim et al disclose an apparatus for preparing an alkyl carboxylic acid ester (abstract). Kim et also disclose that the apparatus comprises a preliminary reactor {11} (Fig. 2; col. 5, lines 61-67) where partial esterification takes place by a reaction with a carboxylic acid and an alcohol to produce alkyl ester (product 4a). Kim et al also disclose a distillation column {13} to receive the reaction product from the preliminary reactor and at least partially separating water and alcohol (Fig. 2). It is to be noted that in Fig. 2, stream {3} is alcohol-rich and stream {3} is water-rich. Kim et al further disclose a main reactor {12} for receiving a reaction product from which water and alcohol are separated from a distillation column and esterifying an unreacted carboxylic acid (Fig. 2; column 5, line 61-column 6, line 16). Kim et al also disclose a separation and purification unit (Fig. 1, 2) for collecting an alkyl carboxylic acid ester produced from the main reactor (12) (Column 4, lines 28-52). With respect to claim 3, Kim et al disclose a first carboxylic acid supply passage {1} and a first alcohol passage {2} connected with first reactor {11} and a second alcohol supply passage {2} connected with the second reactor {12} (Fig. 1 and 2; column 5, line 61-column 6, line 16). With respect to claim 4, Kim et al disclose a distillation column {14} to separate water and alcohol. It is known to those skilled in the art that a distillation column has a reflux condenser at the top to receive and condense the lighter components exiting the distillation column. It is evidenced by Zuber et al. Zuber et al (US 7,329,774 B2) disclose a method and plant for the manufacture of carboxylic acid ester by means of a reactive distillation (title and abstract). Zuber et al also disclose details of reflux from the top of the distillation column (Fig.1, 3; column 5, lines 1-10). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Backed et al, US 20160194267. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PREM C SINGH whose telephone number is (571)272-6381. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6:00 AM to 3:00 PM (Eastern). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yvonne Eyler can be reached at 571-272-1200. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PREM C SINGH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12521689
CONTINUOUS SYNTHESIS SYSTEM OF UREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 8226821
DIRECT COAL LIQUEFACTION WITH INTEGRATED PRODUCT HYDROTREATING AND CATALYST CASCADING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 24, 2012
Patent 8207388
CATALYTIC COMPOSITION AND PROCESS FOR THE TRANSALKYLATION OF AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 26, 2012
Patent 8203027
CONTINUOUS PROCESS AND PLANT DESIGN FOR CONVERSION OF BIOGAS TO LIQUID FUEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 19, 2012
Patent 8192591
SELF-SUSTAINING CRACKING OF HYDROCARBONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 05, 2012
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+33.1%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 356 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month