Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/109,576

SHEET AND APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Examiner
MATZEK, MATTHEW D
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BESTWAY INFLATABLES & MATERIAL CORP.
OA Round
2 (Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
319 granted / 702 resolved
-19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
750
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 702 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment dated 12/30/2025 has been considered and entered into the record. Claim 12, from which all active claims depend, now requires a first and second layer that are coextruded to form an intermediate layer, such that the intermediate layer comprises a mixture of elastic polymer material and binding material. Claim 12 is cancelled. Claims 1–12 and 14–18 remain pending, while claims 1–11 are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 12 and 14–18 are examined below. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 12/30/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 12 and 14–18 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive in light of Applicant’s amendment. Therefore, the rejections have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 12, 15, 16, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haffner (US 5,789,065) in view of Korpman (US 4,379,806). Haffner teaches the formation of a stretchable elastic laminated fabric comprising cloth-like facings, wherein the facings are bonded together using by an extruded, multi-layer composite of elastomeric polymer sheets. Haffner abstract, col. 10, ll. 61–65. The elastomeric polymer sheets may include thermoplastic polyurethane elastomeric material and a pressure sensitive elastomer adhesive layer. Id. at col. 9, l. 46 – col. 10. ll. 43. Haffner fails to teach a first and second layer that are coextruded to form an intermediate layer, such that the intermediate layer comprises a mixture of elastic polymer material and binding material. Korpman teaches the formation of a pressure-sensitive adhesive tape comprising an elastic polymer backing film and a binder prepared by a single step process of co-extrusion. Korpman abstract, col. 4, l. 52 – col. 5, l. 51. The co-extrusion process allows for creation of an intermediate interlocking layer formed by the mixing of the binder and backing film layers. Id. at col. 2, ll. 1–10. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have co-extruded the elastomeric polymer sheet and adhesive layer of Haffner, whereby the sheet and adhesive layer form an intermediate layer comprising both adhesive and the elastic polymer sheet motivated by the desire to provide resistance to separation of the sheet and adhesive layer. See id. at col. 2, ll. 5–10. Claim 17 is rejected as the fabric layers are laminated to the elastomeric polymer sheets through the application of pressure between nip rolls. Haffner abstract. Claim 15 is rejected as one of the elastomeric polymer sheets may be composite of different materials. See id. at col. 10, ll. 61 – col. 11, ll. 17. Claim(s) 14 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Haffner and Korpman as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view of Yoneda (CN 102448695 A). Haffner fails to teach the use of a polyurethane reactive hot-melt adhesive in the binding material. Yoneda teaches a manufacturing method of forming a polyurethane laminated body comprising a composite fiber sheet and a polyurethane resin layer, wherein the polyurethane resin enters part of the composite fiber sheet to form a mixed intermediate layer. Yoneda abstract. The polyurethane resin is a hot melt urethane adhesive resin, wherein the polyurethane resin reacts and is crosslinked subsequently. Id. ¶¶ 24, 120. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have looked to Yoneda for guidance as to a suitable adhesive material in making a polyurethane laminate in order to successfully practice the invention of Haffner. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW D MATZEK whose telephone number is (571)272-5732. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571.272.7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW D MATZEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600072
HIGHLY CRYSTALLINE POLY(LACTIC ACID) FILAMENTS FOR MATERIAL-EXTRUSION BASED ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600111
ELASTIC MEMBER AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597532
METAL-INSIDE-FIBER-COMPOSITE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A METAL-AND-FIBER-COMPOSITE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576572
FILAMENT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576619
LAYERED CONTAINMENT FEATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+38.4%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 702 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month