Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/109,577

TERMINAL APPARATUS AND METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Examiner
BATES, KEVIN T
Art Unit
2472
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 9m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
141 granted / 215 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
231
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 215 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Response to Amendment This Office Action is in response to a communication received on July 15, 2025. Claims 1-3 have been amended. Claims 1-3 are pending in this application. This application has been reassigned to a new examiner. Contact information of the new examiner is available at the end of the action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments directed to the §102(a)(1) rejection of claims 1-3, as being anticipated by Kuo, is persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made and was necessitated by the claim amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Tenny et al (US PGPUB 2023/0136875, hereinafter “Tenny”). Regarding claim 1, Tenny teaches a third terminal apparatus (Fig 6, mapped to Relay UE) for communicating with a first terminal apparatus (Fig 6, mapped to Remote UE 1) and a second terminal apparatus (Fig 6, mapped to Remote UE 2), the third terminal apparatus being responsible to relay communication between the first terminal apparatus and the second terminal apparatus (see Fig 6, ¶66-67, wherein the relay node is helping setup an end-to-end connection between remote U1 and remote UE2), the third terminal apparatus comprising: a processing unit (¶34); and a transmitter (¶34), wherein the processing unit transmits a configuration to the second terminal apparatus, and the configuration is used by the third terminal apparatus to receive a sidelink transmission that is transmitted from the first terminal apparatus to the third terminal apparatus (¶¶68-70, wherein “a configuration” includes one or more values of the End-to-end identifier (see ¶70), wherein both the configuration between the Remote UE 1 and Relay UE and the configuration between the Relay UE and the Remote UE 2 can include the same configuration information for the RLC channels). Regarding claim 2, Tenny teaches a second terminal apparatus (Fig 6, remote UE 2) for communicating with a first terminal apparatus (Fig. 6, Remote UE 1) via a third terminal apparatus (Fig. 6, Relay UE, the second terminal apparatus comprising: a processing unit (¶34); and a receiver configured to receive a configuration from the third terminal apparatus, wherein the configuration is used by the third terminal apparatus to receive a sidelink transmission, that is transmitted from the first terminal apparatus to the third terminal apparatus (¶¶68-70, wherein “a configuration” includes one or more values of the End-to-end identifier (see ¶70), wherein both the configuration between the Remote UE 1 and Relay UE and the configuration between the Relay UE and the Remote UE 2 can include the same configuration information for the RLC channels), and the processing unit applies the configuration to the second terminal apparatus (¶71, wherein the end-to-end identifier plus other configuration values are applied to the Remote UE 2 to establish the second leg of the communication between the relate UE and the Remote UE 2). Regarding claim 3, Tenny teaches a method performed by a third terminal apparatus (Fig 6, mapped to Relay UE) for communicating with a first terminal apparatus (Fig 6, mapped to Remote UE 1) and a second terminal apparatus(Fig 6, mapped to Remote UE 2), the third terminal apparatus being responsible to relay communication between the first terminal apparatus and the second terminal apparatus (see Fig 6, ¶66-67, wherein the relay node is helping setup an end-to-end connection between remote U1 and remote UE2), the method comprising: transmitting a configuration to the second terminal apparatus, wherein the configuration is used by the third terminal apparatus to receive a sidelink transmission, that is transmitted from the first terminal apparatus to the third terminal apparatus(¶¶68-70, wherein “a configuration” includes one or more values of the End-to-end identifier (see ¶70), wherein both the configuration between the Remote UE 1 and Relay UE and the configuration between the Relay UE and the Remote UE 2 can include the same configuration information for the RLC channels). Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent No. 2021/0352767 because it teaches specific communication to establish sidelink relay communications. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN T BATES whose telephone number is (571)272-3980. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN T BATES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2472
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 14, 2023
Application Filed
May 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 18, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603688
SPATIAL FILTER CORRESPONDENCE AND RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURES FOR RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598519
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR IMPLEMENTING CARRIER AGGREGATION FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES OVER MOBILE NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12557137
CHANNEL OCCUPANCY SHARING CONDITIONS FOR BEAM-BASED CHANNEL ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550061
ENHANCED POWER SAVING TECHNIQUE BASED ON WAKE-UP SIGNAL FUNCTIONALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12526112
METHOD FOR SENDING DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL, METHOD FOR RECEIVING DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL, AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.0%)
4y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 215 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month