Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/109,774

TECHNOLOGIES FOR COORDINATING DISAGGREGATED ACCELERATOR DEVICE RESOURCES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 14, 2023
Priority
Nov 29, 2016 — provisional 62/427,268 +3 more
Examiner
CAO, DIEM K
Art Unit
2196
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
549 granted / 682 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.9%
+7.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 682 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-12 are pending. Applicant has amended claims 1, 5 and 9. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/3/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang et al. (CN 105979007 A) in view of Gonzalez et al. (US 2016/0301624 A1) further in view of Jackson (US 7,971,204 B2). As to claim 1, Huang teaches cloud computing system for use in providing at least one cloud-based service associated with execution of at least one workload, the cloud computing system being for use in association with at least one network communication link (Fig. 1 is a system architecture diagram of the NFV NFV system, used in all kinds of network, such as a data center network, a carrier network or local area network … performing a virtual network function 108 and NFV monitoring and management of the infrastructure layer 130; page 10, last paragraph), the cloud computing system comprising: compute resources comprising at least one central processing unit and memory circuitry (computer hardware 112, virtual memory 118; page 10, last paragraph, NFV device 102 may also perform a network service; page 11, 2nd paragraph and a computing resource and calculation resource of a computing node; page 14, last paragraph. Inherently, a CPU and memory are included in the computing node.); accelerator resources comprising graphics processing unit (GPU) accelerator circuitry (acceleration source computing node … encoding/decoding or image processing; page 14, 2nd – 3rd paragraphs); network fabric for use in communicatively coupling at least certain of the compute resources and/or accelerator resources (Virtual infrastructure manager … communicate with each other … includes computing hardware 112, storage hardware 114, acceleration hardware 115, network hardware 116, virtual network; page 11, 4th – 5th paragraphs); and management resources for use in allocating, based at least in part upon received request data, the compute resources and the accelerator resources for use in the execution of the at least one workload (When the service time delay of high demand, the service acceleration resource scheduling policy corresponding to the service will reflect acceleration resources and computing resource requirement of the same compute nodes, namely, according to the actual need of the resource scheduling policy service to determine acceleration; page 12, 2nd paragraph); wherein: the at least one workload comprises at least one virtual machine workload and/or at least one container workload (application virtual machine for service; page 12, 1st- 3rd paragraphs); the accelerator resources are configurable to comprise local GPU accelerator circuitry and remote GPU accelerator circuitry (acceleration source computing node … encoding/decoding or image processing; page 14, 2nd – 3rd paragraphs and First, resource scheduling strategy … determining the resource type of the current acceleration … local virtualization acceleration resources … if the current acceleration resource type is remote virtualization acceleration resources or remote hard acceleration resources; page 4, 3rd paragraph and page 7, last paragraph – page 8, 9th paragraph, page 12, last paragraph); the compute resources and the remote GPU accelerator circuitry are comprised in one or more cloud computing data centers (Virtual infrastructure manager … communicate with each other … includes computing hardware 112, storage hardware 114, acceleration hardware 115, network hardware 116, virtual network; page 11, 4th – 5th paragraphs and Fig. 1 is a system architecture diagram of the NFV system, used in all kids of network, such as a data center network, a carrier network or local area network … performing a virtual network function 108 and NFV monitoring and management of the infrastructure layer 130; page 10, last paragraph); the local GPU accelerator circuitry is comprised in at least one housing that is remote from the one or more cloud computing data centers (the current acceleration resource type is remote virtualization acceleration resources or remote hard acceleration resources; page 12, last paragraph); the local GPU accelerator circuitry is to be communicatively coupled to the management resources via the at least one network communication link (Virtual infrastructure manager … communicate with each other … includes computing hardware 112, storage hardware 114, acceleration hardware 115, network hardware 116, virtual network; page 11, 4th – 5th paragraphs); the management resources are configurable to obtain configuration-related data associated with the local GPU accelerator circuitry for use in management of the accelerator resources (receiving acceleration resource attribute information … configuration attribute; page 17, last paragraph and page 21, last 2 paragraphs). Huang does not teach quality of service data and service level agreement data are used for allocating resources, and the cloud computing system is configurable to dynamically reallocate, based upon past resource utilization data, resource utilization prediction data, and machine-learning, the compute resources and/or the accelerator resources for use in the execution of the at least one workload. However, Gonzalez teaches the cloud computing system is configurable to dynamically reallocate, based upon past resource utilization data, resource utilization prediction data, and machine-learning, the compute resources and/or the accelerator resources for use in the execution of the at least one workload (reallocate resources in the cloud environment in order to minimize operating cost. The allocation module reallocates the computing resources based on a least expensive set of resources capable of meeting the current resource requirements of the user device; paragraphs [0095], [0110]-[0111] and The recommendation module receives an instruction … based on predicted demand, current usage, historical models, current trends, and operating cost information … reallocate computing resources; paragraph [0096]-[0099]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to apply the teaching of Gonzalez to the system of Huang because Gonzalez teaches a method that efficiently using resources in data centers/clouds based on current and historical usage data to improve the performance of the system. Jackson teaches allocating/reserving resources to workload/job, based at least in part on received workload/job data, quality of service data, and service level agreement (Job information is provided to the workload manager scheduler from a resource manager. Job attributes include ownership of the job, amount and type of resources required by the job, required criteria (I need this job finished in one hour), preferred criteria (I would like this job to complete in ½ hour), and a wallclock limit, indicating how long the resources are required. A job consists of one or more requirements each which requests a number of resources of a given type; col. 5, lines 35-64). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to apply the teaching of Jackson to the system of Huang as modified by Gonzales because Jackson teaches a method that allows resources spanning different compute resource types to be reserved based on job resource requirements and criteria, which would ensure the resources allocated to meet the criteria of requestor. As to claim 2, Huang as modified by Gonzalez teaches storage resources for use in association with the compute resources and/or the accelerator resources (storage hardware; pages 10, last paragraph and page 11, 5th paragraph); and the compute resource, the accelerator resources, and storage resources are comprised, at least in part, in one or more pools of resources for being dynamically allocated based upon the resource utilization data (page 11, 4th – 5th paragraph and pages 12, 1st-2nd paragraphs) and (Gonzalez: see abstract). As to claim 3, Huang teaches wherein the cloud computing system is configurable to implement hardware attestation associated, at least in part, with the compute resources and/or the accelerator resources (page 18, 1st paragraph and page 20, Steps S507-S508). As to claim 4, Huang teaches wherein the management resources configurable to maintain directory data comprising: identification data to identify the remote GPU accelerator circuitry (acceleration source computing node … encoding/decoding or image processing; page 14, 2nd – 3rd paragraphs and page 12, last paragraph); and configuration data comprising accelerator architecture-related data associated with the remote GPU accelerator circuitry (page 17, last paragraph - page 18, 1st paragraph and page 20, Steps S507-S508). As to claim 5, it is the same as the system claim 1 above except this isa machine-readable storage medium claim, and therefore is rejected under the same ground of rejection. As to claims 6-8, see rejections of claims 2-4 above, respectively. As to claim 9, it is the same as the storage medium claim 5 above, except this is a method claim and therefore is rejected under the same ground of rejection. As to claims 10-12, see rejections of claims 6-8 above, respectively. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEM K CAO whose telephone number is (571)272-3760. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, April Blair can be reached at 571-270-1014. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEM K CAO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2196 DC October 17, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Aug 12, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748630
Distributed Artifical Intelligence Workload Optimizer
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737238
PROVISIONING METHOD FOR CLOUD SERVICE AND SYSTEM THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737231
OUT-OF-ORDER WORKLOAD EXECUTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12717634
ENABLING LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR HETEROGENEOUS CLOUD RESOURCES USING BLUEPRINTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12705062
APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TO CONFIGURE PROCESSOR PARTITIONING
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.8%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 682 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month