Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/110,962

AUXILIARY AIR VENT FOR CLIMATE CONTROL UNIT

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Examiner
ARANT, HARRY E
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Dantherm Cooling Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
274 granted / 569 resolved
-21.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
618
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 569 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims The status of the claims as filed in the reply dated 8/26/2025 are as follows: Claims 1 and 17 are amended, Claims 18, 21, and 24-28 are canceled, Claims 1-17, 19-20, and 22-23 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12, 14-17, 20, 22, and23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jaskari et al. (European Patent Publication EP3191673B1, “Jaskari”, previously cited). Regarding claim 1, Jaskari discloses a climate control system comprising: a heat exchanger assembly (4) including a housing with an external air inlet (51), an external air outlet (52), an internal air inlet (53), and an internal air outlet (54); and an auxiliary air vent assembly (4, as the ventilation device may be provided on both sides of the window, see ¶0051) coupled to the heat exchanger assembly, the auxiliary air vent assembly including a rim (4) at least partially defining an internal air inlet region (see annotated fig 1 below) and an internal air outlet region (see annotated fig 2 below), wherein the auxiliary air vent assembly is capable of positioned between the heat exchanger assembly and an enclosure (as an enclosure could be situated to a side of the auxiliary air vent assembly as shown below in annotated fig 1 below). A recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the structural limitations of the claims, as is the case here. PNG media_image1.png 900 686 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) includes an air passageway (as shown in figs 9 and 10). Regarding claim 3, Jaskari further discloses a first aperture (53) formed in the rim (4) and a second aperture (54) formed in the rim; wherein the first aperture is in fluid communication with the internal air inlet region (see annotated fig 1 above); and wherein the air passageway extends between the first aperture and the second aperture (as shown in figs 9 and 10). Regarding claim 4, Jaskari further discloses wherein the second aperture (54) is in fluid communication with ambient atmosphere (¶0095). Regarding claim 5, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) at least partially surrounds the internal air inlet (51) and the internal air outlet (52) of the housing. Regarding claim 6, Jaskari further discloses wherein the internal air inlet (53) of the heat exchanger assembly is in fluid communication with the internal air inlet region (see annotated fig 1 above, as fluid may flow from the region to the inlet); and wherein the internal air outlet (54) of the heat exchanger assembly is in fluid communication with the internal air outlet region (see annotated fig 2 above, as fluid may flow from the region to the outlet). Regarding claim 7, Jaskari further discloses a divider (70) coupled to the rim (4), wherein the divider is positioned between the internal air inlet region and the internal air outlet region (see annotated figs 1 and 2 above). Regarding claim 8, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) includes a first mount surface (abutting 2, see annotated fig 1 below), a second mount surface (see annotate fig 9 below), an outer surface (see annotated fig 2 below) extending between the first mount surface and the second mount surface, an inner surface (see annotated fig 1 below) extending between the first mount surface and the second mount surface, a first aperture (54) formed on the inner surface, and a second aperture (53) formed in the outer surface. PNG media_image2.png 896 462 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 9, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) further includes an air passageway (see figs 9 and 10) that places the first aperture (52) in and the second aperture (51) in fluid communication (54). Regarding claim 10, Jaskari further discloses wherein the heat exchanger assembly abuts the first mount surface (see annotated fig 1 above). Regarding claim 11, Jaskari further discloses a fan housing (67) with a fan inlet (fig 13), a fan outlet (fig 3), and a fan (64) positioned within the fan housing; wherein the fan outlet is in fluid communication with the internal air outlet region (see annotated fig 2 below and fig 9). PNG media_image3.png 474 704 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 12, Jaskari further discloses wherein the fan inlet (see annotated fig 13 below) and the first mount surface (see annotated fig 13 below) are co-planar. PNG media_image4.png 816 783 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 14, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) is formed of square tubing (see fig 1). Regarding claim 15, Jaskari further discloses wherein the heat exchanger assembly includes a passive heat exchanger (62). Regarding claim 16, Jaskari further discloses wherein the heat exchanger assembly includes a first fan (64) positioned at the internal air inlet (53) configured to create an internal airflow through the housing from the internal air inlet to the internal air outlet; and a second fan (63) positioned at the external air inlet (51) configured to create an external airflow through the housing from the external air inlet (51) to the external air outlet (64); wherein the external airflow is isolated from the internal airflow by a dividing wall (see annotated fig 10 below) positioned within the housing. PNG media_image5.png 714 340 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 17, Jaskari discloses a mount (4) configured to couple a heat exchanger assembly (62) to an enclosure, the mount comprising: a rim (4) formed of square tubing with an internal passageway (see figs 9 and 10); the rim at least partially defining an air inlet region and an air outlet region (see annotated figs 1 and 2 below); a first aperture (53) formed in the rim and in fluid communication with the air inlet region; a second aperture (54) formed in the rim; a fan housing coupled to the rim, the fan housing (68) including a fan inlet and a fan outlet (see annotated fig 13 below), wherein the fan outlet is in fluid communication with the air outlet region (fig 9); and a divider (70) coupled to the rim (4) and positioned between the air inlet region and air outlet region (see annotated figs 1 and 2 below); wherein the internal passageway extends between the first aperture and the second aperture. PNG media_image6.png 896 465 media_image6.png Greyscale Regarding claim 20, Jaskari further discloses wherein the rim (4) includes a first mount surface (see annotated fig 1 below) and a second mount surface (see annotated fig 2 below), and wherein an outer surface (see annotated fig 2 below) extends between the first mount surface and the second mount surface, and an inner surface (see annotated fig 1 below) extends between the first mount surface and the second mount surface; and wherein the fan inlet and the first mount surface are co-planar (see annotated fig 13 below). PNG media_image2.png 896 462 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 816 783 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 22, Jaskari further discloses wherein the divider (70) positioned between the first aperture and the second aperture. Regarding claim 23, Jaskari further discloses wherein the first aperture (53) is formed on an inner surface of the rim, and the second aperture (54) is formed on an outer surface of the rim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jaskari as applied to claims 11 and 17 above, and further in view of Kohler (German Patent Publication DE102008016392A1, previously cited). Regarding claim 13, Jaskari discloses all previous claim limitations. However, Jaskari does not explicitly disclose wherein the external air inlet is positioned between the external air outlet and the fan inlet. Kohler, however, discloses a ventilation device wherein an external air inlet is positioned between an external air outlet and a fan inlet (see annotated fig 3 below). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Jaskari to provide the fan outside the enclosure as taught by Kohler in order to provide easy maintenance. PNG media_image7.png 828 480 media_image7.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, Jaskari discloses all previous claim limitations. However, Jaskari does not explicitly disclose a damper positioned at the fan outlet. Kohler, however, discloses a ventilation device wherein a damper (10) is positioned at the outlet of the fan. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Jaskari to provide the damper of Kohler in order to inhibit backflow (see ¶0011 of Kohler). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/26/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues (page 7) that Jaskari does not teach wherein the auxiliary air vent assembly is of positioned between the heat exchanger assembly and an enclosure as now require by claim 1. However, as explained in the rejection this limitation is considered as intended use limitation. An enclosure could be located on the opposite side (relative to the heat exchanger assembly) of the auxiliary air vent assembly (see annotated fig 1 below), for example there could be hallway on that side of the enclosure. PNG media_image8.png 900 686 media_image8.png Greyscale Applicant argues (pages 7-8) that Jaskari’s device is installed directly in to a window frame as a complete unit, whereas newly amended claim 17 require a mount that serves as an intermediate coupling component. Jaskari’s frame element 4 does not include the now-claimed fan housing a divider as integral components of the mount structure. The Examiner respectfully disagrees; the frame element 4 of Jaskari serves as mount for the heat exchanger assembly 62, further the divider 70 is coupled to the frame element as evident in figure 13, as required by claim 17. Applicant argues (page 7-8) that the Office action does not provide an articulated reason as to why a person of ordinary skill in the art would modify either window ventilation system of Jaskari in view of Kohler to create the three component configuration. The Examiner respectfully disagrees; regarding claim 3, as explained in the rejection, providing the external air inlet between the external air outlet and the fan inlet would allow for easier access to the fan for repairs of replacement. With regards to claim 19, Kohler teaches the damper inhibits backflow of air (¶0011), therefore it would have obvious for Jaskari to provide the damper in order to inhibit backflow. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARRY E ARANT whose telephone number is (571)272-1105. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jianying Atkisson can be reached at (571)270-7740. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARRY E ARANT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 26, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601547
EXTRUDED CONNECTED MICROTUBE AND HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590713
METHODS AND SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS TO SUPPORT REDUCED ENERGY AND WATER USAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578144
SUPPORT ASSEMBLY IN A HEAT STORAGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12546545
ALUMINUM ALLOY HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546543
HEAT STORAGE POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AND POWER GENERATION CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+22.4%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 569 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month