Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/111,901

Vehicle Portable Coffee Cup

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 21, 2023
Priority
Apr 07, 2022 — CN 202210358842.9
Examiner
ROSARIO-APONTE, ALBA T
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Zhejiang Ansheng Science & Technology Stock Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 493 resolved
-14.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(f): (f) Element in Claim for a Combination. – An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The claims in this application are given their broadest reasonable interpretation using the plain meaning of the claim language in light of the specification as it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The broadest reasonable interpretation of a claim element (also commonly referred to as a claim limitation) is limited by the description in the specification when 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is invoked. As explained in MPEP § 2181, subsection I, claim limitations that meet the following three-prong test will be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph: (A) the claim limitation uses the term “means” or “step” or a term used as a substitute for “means” that is a generic placeholder (also called a nonce term or a non-structural term having no specific structural meaning) for performing the claimed function; (B) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is modified by functional language, typically, but not always linked by the transition word “for” (e.g., “means for”) or another linking word or phrase, such as “configured to” or “so that”; and (C) the term “means” or “step” or the generic placeholder is not modified by sufficient structure, material, or acts for performing the claimed function. Use of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim with functional language creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites sufficient structure, material, or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Absence of the word “means” (or “step”) in a claim creates a rebuttable presumption that the claim limitation is not to be treated in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. The presumption that the claim limitation is not interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, is rebutted when the claim limitation recites function without reciting sufficient structure, material or acts to entirely perform the recited function. Claim limitations in this application that use the word “means” (or “step”) are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. Conversely, claim limitations in this application that do not use the word “means” (or “step”) are not being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, except as otherwise indicated in an Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: “a cup lid mechanism”, “a filter mechanism”, “a bracket mechanism”, “a heating mechanism”, “a pumping mechanism” and “a control mechanism” in claim 1. Because this/these claim limitation(s) is/are being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, it/they is/are being interpreted to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification as performing the claimed function, and equivalents thereof. As noticed in paragraph 0021, the cup lid mechanism comprises a cup lid, a bottom cover plate, a cup mouth sealing ring, a filter sealing ring, a press switch component, a safety lock component and a water retaining cover component. As noticed in paragraph 0025, the filter screen mechanism comprises a supporting bucket and a filter screen. As noticed in paragraph 0026, the bracket mechanism comprises a plastic shell, a stainless steel shell, a handle, a lower mounting bracket, an upper mounting bracket, a battery transmission sheet, a battery bottom cover and a battery transmission bracket. As noticed in paragraph 0027, the heating mechanism comprises a heater, a conductor and a first control PCBA board. As noticed in paragraph 0028, the pumping mechanism comprises a filter piece, a drain pipe, a water pump and a silicone pumping pipe. As noticed paragraph 0029, the control mechanism comprises a display screen, a key and a second control PCBA board. If applicant does not intend to have this/these limitation(s) interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, applicant may: (1) amend the claim limitation(s) to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph (e.g., by reciting sufficient structure to perform the claimed function); or (2) present a sufficient showing that the claim limitation(s) recite(s) sufficient structure to perform the claimed function so as to avoid it/them being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 10, the limitation “an L-type slot” is unclear if it is referring to the L type slot recited in line 8, or a different L-type slot. Claims 2-10 are rejected due to their dependency from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: LIU (CN 113491444) teaches a vehicle portable coffee cup (abstract; p.0014; Fig. 1), comprising: a cup body (1); wherein a stainless steel plate (12, 13) is movable inserted in a lower part of the stainless steel cup body (as shown in Fig. 2 and 3), a ring (2) is arranged on an upper part of the stainless steel cup body (as shown in Fig. 2 and 3), an upper end of the cup body is connected to two articulated blocks (the articulated blocks are fixed to the cup cover 4; as shown in Fig. 2), and the upper end of the cup body is provided with an lock (as shown in Fig. 1 and 2); a cup lid mechanism (4) is rotated between the two articulated blocks by a rotating shaft (as shown in Fig. 2), and the cup lid mechanism is connected to the lock to seal the upper part of the cup body (as shown in Fig. 1 and 2); a hole is arranged on the cup lid mechanism (as shown in Fig. 4 below); a filter mechanism (3) is arranged in the stainless steel cup body, and the filter mechanism is used to place coffee powder (para. 0019; 0021; 0032); a bracket mechanism (body of hot water tank assembly 5) is arranged on the lower portion of the cup body (as shown in Fig. 1-4); a heating mechanism (part of hot water tank assembly 5) is arranged on the bracket mechanism (as shown in Fig. 1-4), and the heating mechanism is used to heat water inside the cup body (para. 0031-0032); an outlet pipe (7) is arranged on the cup body (as shown in Fig. 2-4); a control mechanism (6) is arranged on a lower part of the bracket mechanism (as shown in Fig. 1-4). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Hole)] PNG media_image1.png 821 434 media_image1.png Greyscale LIU fails to disclose wherein the cup body is made of stainless steel; wherein the upper end of the stainless steel plate is fixedly connected to a silicone seal; wherein the ring is made of a plastic; wherein the upper end of the plastic ring is fixedly connected to two articulated blocks, and the upper end of the plastic ring is provided with an L-type slot; an arc hole is arranged on the cup lid mechanism; a bracket mechanism is arranged on the plastic ring; a pumping mechanism is arranged on the bracket mechanism, and the pumping mechanism is used to extract the water inside the stainless steel cup body; a silicone outlet pipe is arranged on the cup lid mechanism, and one end of the silicone outlet pipe is connected to the pumping mechanism; a plug-in hole is arranged on a plastic shell; and a battery is arranged on the bracket mechanism. HE (CN 212326163) teaches a vehicle portable coffee cup (abstract; Fig. 1), comprising: a stainless steel cup body (1 and 31); a plastic ring (32) is arranged on an upper part of the stainless steel cup body (as shown in Fig. 2 and 3), a cup lid mechanism (2) is rotated between the two articulated blocks by a rotating shaft, an upper end of the plastic ring is provided with threads and the cup lid mechanism is connected to threads to seal the upper part of the stainless steel cup body (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3); a hole is arranged on the cup lid mechanism (inherently present to drink the coffee by opening the small lid provided in cup cover 2; as shown in Fig. 1-2); a filter mechanism (43) is arranged in the stainless steel cup body (as shown in Fig. 2 and 3), and the filter mechanism is used to place coffee powder (para. 0031; 0036; 0048-0049); a heating mechanism is arranged on the bracket mechanism, and the heating mechanism is used to heat water inside the stainless steel cup body; a pumping mechanism (6) is arranged on the cup body (as shown in Fig. 3), and the pumping mechanism is used to extract the water inside the stainless steel cup body (para. 0035; 0041; 0044); an outlet pipe (7) is arranged on the cup lid mechanism (by upper connector 321), and one end of the outlet pipe is connected to the pumping mechanism (as shown in Fig. 3); a control mechanism (11) is arranged on the cup body (as shown in Fig. 3); a plug-in hole is arranged on the cup body (1; para. 0047-0049); and a battery (16) is arranged on the cup body (as shown in Fig. 3). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modifies the portable coffee cup of LIU, with HE, by providing a stainless steel cup body for durability and insulation, the ring made of plastic for insulation purposes, a L-type slot for lid locking as a design choice, the hole in arc shape as a design choice, a pumping mechanism for better water flow control, the outlet pipe made of silicone for flexibility, durability and heat resistance, a plug-in hole arranged on a plastic shell for providing power to the coffee cup but able to disconnect the power cable for storage, and a battery to have the alternative to heat the coffee without needing to plug it in to a fixed power source. Allowance of claims 1-10 is indicated because the prior art of record does not show or fairly suggest a vehicle portable coffee cup wherein an upper end of the stainless steel plate is fixedly connected to a silicone seal; a bracket mechanism is arranged on the stainless steel cup body and the plastic ring; wherein in the heat mechanism is arranged in the bracket mechanism, wherein the pumping mechanism is arranged on the bracket mechanism, and wherein the control mechanism is arranged on the bracket mechanism, as recited in claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2022/0061577, US 2019/0343320 and US 2002/0175158. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE whose telephone number is (571)272-9325. The examiner can normally be reached M to F; 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE/Examiner, Art Unit 3761 07/26/2026 /ELIZABETH M KERR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746620
SINGLE-BEAM DOUBLE-PHYSICAL-EFFECT COORDINATING AND DISTRIBUTING METHOD APPLICABLE TO UNIFORM LASER SHOCK AND APPLICATION THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728474
ARC WELDING TORCH
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12696995
BEVERAGE PREPARATION MACHINE WITH CAPSULE RECOGNITION
6y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697673
WELDING GUIDING SYSTEM PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY IMAGES
6y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696356
ELECTRIC BLANKET
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+25.2%)
3y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month