Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/112,170

Wireless Device Assisted Resource Selection

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 21, 2023
Examiner
JAIN, RAJ K
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ofinno LLC
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
717 granted / 818 resolved
+29.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 818 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Freda et al (US 20210329596 A1) hereinafter as Freda in view of Babaei et al (USP 11153060 B2) hereinafter as Babaei. Regarding claim(s) 1,9,17, Freda discloses a method comprising: receiving, by a first wireless device from a base station, a system information block (See ¶ 70, The resource pool configuration or resource pools may be semi-statically or dynamically signaled to WTRUs via radio resource control (RRC) signaling or system information broadcasting (e.g., SIB).) comprising: radio resources of a sidelink resource pool (See ¶ 70-71 the SIB has resource pools indicated by gNB in one SIB message…the term resource pool may refer to one or more sets of radio resources.); an indication that wireless device assisted resource selection is enabled for the sidelink resource pool (See ¶ 168-169), wherein the wireless device assisted resource selection is associated with excluding one or more resources of the sidelink resource pool (See ¶ 180-182, The criteria may include, but are not limited to: excluding resources for which another WTRU's SCI is detected and reserves the same or a subset of the resources); receiving by the first wireless device, a configuration message indicating one or more first resources from the sidelink resource pool (See ¶ 142, A WTRU may determine one or more transmission configuration based on the reception configuration in which the other WTRU's transmissions were received/measured (e.g., with certain quality); selecting, by the first wireless device based on a result of a sidelink sensing operation of the first wireless device that excludes the one or more first resources from candidate resources, one or more second resources from the candidate resources in the sidelink resource pool (See ¶ 180-181, excluding resources for which another WTRU's SCI is detected and reserves resources adjacent (in time/frequency/beam) to the said resources…. A WTRU may further perform such exclusion as long as the amount of available resources is sufficient for resource selection among those available resources. Freda fails to disclose – transmitting, by the first wireless device to the second wireless device, one or more transport blocks via one or more transmission resources of the one or more second resources selected by the first wireless device. Babaei discloses - transmitting, by the first wireless device to the second wireless device, one or more transport blocks via one or more transmission resources of the one or more second resources selected by the first wireless device (See ¶ .. 464-466. the wireless device may select, as selected resources for transmission, one of the first resources (e.g., corresponding to data or a transport block, e.g., based on a dynamic grant or a configured grant) or the second resources (e.g., corresponding to the SP-CSI signal) based on one or more selection criteria). Transport block allows for user data traffic via sidelink allows for direct communication between two devices without the participation of a base station and thus reduction in overhead. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to incorporate the teachings of Babaei within Ganesan, whereby transport block allows for user data traffic via sidelink allows for direct communication between two devices without the participation of a base station and thus reduction in overhead. Regarding claim(s) 2, 10, 18, Freda discloses wherein the first wireless device and the second wireless device belong to a group (See ¶ 136, The mapping may be determined by a destination address or similar ID identifying the receiving WTRU, group of WTRUs). Regarding claim(s) 3, 11, 19, Freda discloses, wherein a the one or more first resources are a subset of resource pool and number of subsets in the resource pool is based on a number of members in the group (See ¶ 180, 198,The criteria may include, but are not limited to: excluding resources for which another WTRU's SCI is detected and reserves the same or a subset of the resources.). Regarding claim(s) 4, 12, 20, Freda discloses wherein the group is a unicast group or a groupcast group (See ¶ ..198). Regarding claim(s) 5, 13, Freda discloses wherein the sensing operation comprises comparing measurements to a threshold to determine whether a corresponding candidate resource is to be excluded. (See ¶ .70, 180, excluding resources for which another WTRU's SCI is detected and reserves resources adjacent (in time/frequency/beam) to the said resources; and use of a more stringent threshold for comparison of PSCCH RSRP for certain values of the range/reliability.). Regarding claim(s) 6, Freda discloses wherein measurement results of sidelink reference signal received power (SL-RSRP) are used in the sensing operation. (See ¶ 103, The WTRU may use sensing results, such as RSSI, RSRP of scheduling assignment). Regarding claim(s) 7, 15, Freda discloses wherein the receiving of the configuration message is based on the wireless device assisted resource selection being enabled (See Fig(s). 2, See ¶ 168 A WTRU may further enable/disable sensing operation (e.g., performed by lower layers) based on upper layer indication that a specific service is enabled/disabled or may/may not generate data to be transmitted for a certain period of time.). Regarding claim(s) 8, 16, Freda discloses wherein the configuration message is received via a sidelink radio resource control message (RRC), a media access control (MAC) control element (CE), or sidelink control information (SCI) (See ¶ 70 Pool configuration may be carried via a System Information Block (SIB) and/or dedicated RRC signaling.). Regarding claim(s) 14, Freda discloses wherein the one or more transmission resources are based on the configuration message (See ¶ 70,109, The resource pool configuration or resource pools may be semi-statically or dynamically signaled to WTRUs via radio resource control (RRC) signaling or system information broadcasting (e.g., SIB). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Raj Jain whose telephone number is (571) 272-3145. The examiner can normally be reached on M-Th ~8 ~6. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached on 571-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /RAJ JAIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 20, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 05, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 22, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 27, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 27, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 28, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 19, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 19, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 25, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12568472
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING BASED ON SUB-RESOURCE POOLS FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568514
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568512
Method and Apparatus for Determining Sidelink Transmission Resource
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563561
SIGNALING ASPECTS OF APERIODIC CSI REPORTING TRIGGERED BY A DOWNLINK GRANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563578
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RESERVING RESOURCES IN NR V2X
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 818 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month