Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/112,627

VEHICULAR INTERIOR COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 22, 2023
Examiner
TATESURE, VINCENT
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toyota Boshoku Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
193 granted / 426 resolved
-19.7% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+31.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
465
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
63.3%
+23.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 426 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species 1 in the reply filed on October 30, 2025 is acknowledged. In view of the claim amendments which further define the direction of window glass as a front-rear direction, the restriction has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 4, 6 and 10-12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 contains the limitation “an extending direction.” It is unclear as to the precise requirement for extending direction since the part extends in multiple directions. In effort to further the prosecution the limitation will be interpreted as the front-rear direction. Claim 4 contains the limitations “first skin,” “edge skin” and third, fourth, fifth and sixth directions and threads. It is unclear if the “first skin” and third and fourth directions are equivalent to the skin of claim 1 and the corresponding first and second directions or if each of these elements . Applicant’s specification appears to support that the first, third and fifth directions and threads are equivalent and the second, fourth and sixth directions and threads are equivalent, wherein the designations of skin, first skin and edge skin refer to the relative position of arbitrary portions of the fabric (Applicant’s Specification, paragraph [0030]-[0032]). In efforts to further the prosecution the limitations will be interpreted as referring to regions of a singular skin layer woven fabric wherein the odd number directions and threads are equivalent and the even number directions and threads are equivalent. Claim 11 contains the limitation “an edge of a window glass.” It is unclear if this limitation is drawn to an end use of the product, or if the window glass is included as part of the base component. In effort to further the prosecution the limitation will be interpreted as an applied use of the interior component. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 6 and 10-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pub No. 2020/0079189 to Kito. Regarding Claims 1 Kito teaches a vehicular interior component comprising a base extending in an “extending direction” including a body portion and a structural portion that includes a projection portion and a recessed portion and a skin portion on the vehicular interior side of the base which may be a woven fabric in which necessarily due to the nature of woven fabrics includes first threads extending in a first direction and second threads extending in a second direction that crosses the first direction (Kito, abstract, fig 1-12, paragraph [0167]). Kito teaches that the skin provides a design surface and therefore the fibers must reflect some amount of light in order to be visible and a design to be achieved (Id., paragraph [0165]). In the event it is shown that Kito does not disclose the claimed invention, with sufficient specificity, the invention is obvious because Kito discloses the claimed constituents and discloses that they may be used alternatively or in combination, to successfully practice the invention of Kito based on the totality of the teachings of Kito. Regarding Claims 2-3, 6 and 11-12 Kito teaches the skin may be placed adjacent to an edge of window glass extending in the front-rear direction (Id.). Kito does not specifically teach the orientation of the woven fabric. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to orient the skin layer woven fabric in any desired manner such as wherein the first threads extend in an upper-bottom direction and the second threads extend in a front-rear (extending) direction, motivated by the desire to form a conventional interior fabric for an automobile having any desired aesthetic design qualities. Furthermore, a woven fabric typically necessarily includes a 90 degree angle between first and second (weft and warp) fiber types and thus this orientation is achieved by simple rotation of the fabric. Regarding Claims 4 and 10 Kito teaches that the skin includes portions which may cover various components of a vehicular interior which would necessarily include arbitrary edge skin and first skin components (third to sixth threads/directions) oriented in the direction of the skin layer (Id). Claim(s) 5 and 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kito as applied to claims 1-4, 6 and 10-12 above, in view of WO-2019/225304 to Ueda. Regarding Claims 5 and 7-9 Kito does not appear to teach that the first threads have a triangular cross section. However, Ueda teaches a skin material for an automotive interior which may comprise a woven fabric containing fibers having a triangular cross section to improve reflectivity (Ueda, abstract, background, paragraphs [0033] and [0051]). Ueda teaches that the diameter of the triangular fiber is between 1 and 5 micrometers (Id.). Ueda taches that additional fibers may be included which comprise diameters greater than 5 micrometers and possess lower light reflectivity than the smaller fibers but provide structural properties (Id., paragraph [0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to form the vehicular interior component of Kito, and to utilize as the warp and weft yarns the triangular reflective yarns and structural “other yarns” of Ueda, motivated by the desire to form a conventional vehicular interior component having improved light reflectivity without sacrificing durability and longevity of the interior trim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VINCENT A TATESURE whose telephone number is (571)272-5198. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30AM-4PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Chriss can be reached at 5712727783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VINCENT TATESURE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 22, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Apr 13, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12577704
FIBER SHEET, ELECTROSPINNING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FIBER SHEET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566048
HIGH BUOYANCY COMPOSITE MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559653
Articles with an Adhesive Layer
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12559865
POLYCARBONATE FIBERS, FIBER STRUCTURE AND RESIN COMPOSITE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12514334
LIGHTWEIGHT KNITTED UPPER AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+31.4%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 426 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month