Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/113,347

Catheter Adapter with Stabilization Feature

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 23, 2023
Examiner
KOO, BENJAMIN K
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
116 granted / 204 resolved
-13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+49.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 204 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group B in the reply filed on 01/09/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that no serious burden exists because the groups have similar elements and that results from a search of any group will necessarily produce results for the other groups. This is not found persuasive because each of the species have been identified as having non-obvious and mutually exclusive characteristics. Examination burden comes from developing and analyzing synonyms for each different species. Examination burden would also increase exponentially in subsequent actions as the subject matter further diverges due to increasing specificity of the separately claimed elements. And a search for one species will not “necessarily” produce results for the other groups because each species has mutually exclusive characteristics. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 2, 4, 6-14, and 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 01/09/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 15, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Publication No. 2020/0094026 to Isaacson et al. (“Isaacson”). Regarding claim 1, Isaacson teaches a catheter adapter (Figs. 11A-D) comprising a body (313) having a first end and a second end positioned opposite the first end (left and right ends of 313), the body comprising an inlet port (walls surrounding 304 in Fig. 11A, not including the cap indicated at 302) positioned between the first end and the second end (Fig. 11A), the body defining a longitudinal axis extending between the first end and the second end of the body (longitudinal axis of 313), a catheter (15, as labeled in other embodiments) configured to be inserted into a patient's vasculature, the catheter positioned at the first end of the body (left end of Fig. 11A), and a stabilizer comprising a first wing member and a second wing member (wings as best shown in Figs. 11B & D), a portion of the stabilizer extending beyond the inlet port of the body in a direction extending along the longitudinal axis from the first end of the body to the second end of the body (Fig. 11A/B, the wing extends to the right beyond the inlet port), wherein a bottom surface of the stabilizer is configured to contact a skin surface of a patient (the wings are intended to attach to a skin surface), and wherein the bottom surface of the stabilizer defines a plane forming an angle greater than zero relative to the longitudinal axis of the body (as best seen in Fig. 11C). Regarding claim 3, Isaacson teaches the catheter adapter of claim 1 as shown above, Isaacson further teaching the stabilizer is symmetric with respect to the longitudinal axis (Fig. 11B). Regarding claim 5, Isaacson teaches the catheter adapter of claim 1 as shown above, Isaacson further teaching the first wing member (Fig. 11B, top wing) includes a first end (left end of top wing) and a second end (right end of top wing), the first wing member defining a recessed portion adjacent to the inlet port of the body (right end has a recess as shown in Fig. 11B), the recessed portion of the first wing member extending from the second end of the first wing member toward the first end of the first wing member (the recess extends from the right side to the left side of the wing in Fig. 11B). Regarding claim 15, Isaacson teaches a vascular access device comprising a catheter adapter (Figs. 11A-D) comprising a body (313) having a first end and a second end positioned opposite the first end (left and right ends of 313), the body comprising an inlet port (walls surrounding 304 in Fig. 11A, not including the cap indicated at 302) positioned between the first end and the second end (Fig. 11A), the body defining a longitudinal axis (longitudinal axis of 313) extending between the first end and the second end of the body, a catheter (15, as labeled in other embodiments) configured to be inserted into a patient's vasculature, the catheter positioned at the first end of the body (left end of Fig. 11A), a stabilizer comprising a first wing member and a second wing member (wings as best shown in Figs. 11B & D), a portion of the stabilizer extending beyond the inlet port of the body in a direction extending along the longitudinal axis from the first end of the body to the second end of the body (Fig. 11A/B, the wing extends to the right beyond the inlet port), wherein a bottom surface of the stabilizer is configured to contact a skin surface of a patient (the wings are intended to attach to a skin surface), and wherein the bottom surface of the stabilizer defines a plane forming an angle greater than zero relative to the longitudinal axis of the body (as best seen in Fig. 11C), and a needle hub assembly connected to the body of the catheter adapter (needle hub assembly is on the far right of Figs. 11A-D). Regarding claim 16, Isaacson teaches the vascular access device of claim 15 as shown above, Isaacson further teaching the stabilizer is spaced from the needle hub assembly (Fig. 11B, the wings are spaced from the needle hub assembly as defined above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN KOO whose telephone number is (703)756-1749. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at (571) 270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.K./Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /THEODORE J STIGELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12521493
DRIVE ASSEMBLY FOR A MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12427285
Rapidly Insertable Central Catheters, Introducers, Insertion Devices Including Combinations and Methods Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Patent 12420027
DEVICE FOR ADMINISTERING A FLUID
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Patent 10010706
HOLLOW MICRONEEDLE ARRAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 03, 2018
Patent 9993595
PATCH PUMP CARTRIDGE ATTACHMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 12, 2018
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+49.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month