Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/114,092

USES OF UROLITHINS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Feb 24, 2023
Priority
Feb 24, 2022 — GB 2202515.9 +2 more
Examiner
GANGLE, BRIAN J
Art Unit
1645
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Amazentis SA
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
733 granted / 956 resolved
+16.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
37.4%
-2.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 956 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s amendment and remarks filed on 6/22/2026 are acknowledged. Claims 1, 3-4, 7, 9-10, 15-16, and 20-21 are amended. Claims 2, 6, 13-14, 22-23, and 25-26 are cancelled. Claims 1, 3-4, 7-11, 15-16, and 20-21 are pending. Election/Restrictions Claims 7-11, 15-16, and 20-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/7/2025. Claims 1 and 3-4 are currently under examination. Objections Maintained Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The specification contains claims. These claims do not correspond with the actual claims. The claims are required to be a separate section from the specification. Appropriate correction is required. Applicant has not responded to this objection. Claim Rejections Withdrawn The rejection of claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention is withdrawn in light of applicant’s amendment thereto. The rejection of claims 1-4 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vannini et al (WO2020/201076; IDS filed 7/12/2023) is withdrawn in light of applicant’s amendment thereto. The rejection of claims 2, 6, and 25-26 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chunyang et al (CN113813255; IDS filed 7/12/2023; translation attached). Page references are to the translation document) is withdrawn. The cancellation of the claims renders the rejection moot. Claim Rejections Maintained 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The rejection of claims 1 and 3-4 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chunyang et al (CN113813255; IDS filed 7/12/2023; translation attached). Page references are to the translation document) is maintained for the reasons set forth in the previous office action. The instant claims are drawn to T-cell populations enriched in T-memory stem cells. Chunyang et al disclose the use of urolithin A in tumor immunotherapy (see abstract). Chunyang et al show treatment of CD8 T cells with urolithin A (see page 7, section 2). According to the instant specification, exposure of T cells to urolithin results in a population enriched in T memory stem cells including CD8 positive T-memory stem cells. Chunyang et al also disclose treatment of CAR-T cells with urolithin A (see page 7, section 3 and Figure 1C). Applicant argues: That Chunyang et al does not disclose a T cell population enriched in CAR-expressing T memory stem cells and instead discloses promotion of effector CAR-T cells which are distinct from CAR-expressing T memory stem cells. Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered and are not persuasive for the following reasons: The instant specification indicates that exposure of T cells to urolithin results in a population enriched in T memory stem cells. Therefore, when Chunyang exposed their CAR T cells to urolithin, they necessarily ended up with a composition enriched in CAR expressing T memory stem cells. Conclusion No claim is allowed. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian J Gangle whose telephone number is (571)272-1181. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anne Gussow can be reached at 571-272-6047. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN GANGLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 24, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746260
EXTRACT OF BACTERIA OF THE GENUS SPHINGOMONAS
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12709731
METHOD OF PRODUCING BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12702684
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING SKIN DISEASE WITH RECOMBINANT MICROORGANISMS
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698328
NOVEL ANTIBODIES
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685708
NOVEL SKIN CARE COMPOSITION
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 956 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month