Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/114,730

INGOT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
S-Corp Global Limited
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
1156 granted / 1771 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1805
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1771 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: the ovular face and the foundation of the spherical surface are not found in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 10 has added the limitation range of the diameter of the openings at the end of the cylindrical void to be between 1-4 millimeters. However, the original disclosure only defines the openings to be “about 2mm” (paragraph [0018]). The is no disclosure of the opening diameter being 1 mm or 3 mm or 4 mm. In order to correct this problem, it is suggested that the limitation be changed to define the diameter of the openings to be “about 2 mm”, which was disclosed in the original application. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 5, the shape of “the ovular face” is not determinable. There is no definition of the shape in the specification. And, there is no customary meaning of this term “ovular”. As, it seems that the ends of the flat longitudinal surfaces present as a semi-circular surface. Also, it is unclear from the disclosure of what and where the foundation of the spherical surface begins or ends. It is suggested that the specification be amended to include these terms with reference numbers and annotation in the drawings to show the scope this new limitation on the ingot. Also, the last paragraph is inaccurate. It is suggested to change the last paragraph to –wherein, each of the flat longitudinal surfaces define one semi-circular face on each end of the flat longitudinal surfaces that form a side of each spherical surface on each opposing end of the obround body--. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The use of the term ingot is understood to define a piece of single metal or metal alloy formed into a shape and size that is on the order of an ounce and weareable on a necklace or bracelet or earring, i.e., a bead of a single metal is considered to meet the applicant’s definition of an ingot. Stone discloses an obround metallic bead (ingot 18, steel, stainless steel, brass, copper or aluminum, i.e., non-precious metal) with a cylindrical bore (12) that receives and encases a cylindrical wire (20, musical string). The ingot has the shape as described in the claims as shown in the annotated drawing. PNG media_image1.png 409 917 media_image1.png Greyscale Stone fails to disclose a cylindrical bore extending from one flat side surface to the other and spherical end surfaces located on each end of the bead. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 05, 2024
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 06, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Sep 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599202
BAND AND TIMEPIECE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599188
HOOK-CLASP STRUCTURE AND UNDERWEAR BACK CLASP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595817
FASTENER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588740
Adjustable Bracelet
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584710
ADJUSTABLE,INTERCHANGEABLE HOLSTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1771 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month