Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/115,402

Wearable Engineered Human Skin and Systems and Methods for Making the Same

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Feb 28, 2023
Priority
Sep 11, 2020 — provisional 63/077,029 +1 more
Examiner
TICHY, JENNIFER M.H.
Art Unit
1653
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
400 granted / 616 resolved
+4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
699
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the paper filed 9 June 2026. Claims 1, 3, and 5 have been amended. Claim 2 has been cancelled. Claims 7-20 remain withdrawn. Claims 1 and 3-6 are currently pending and under examination. This Application is a continuation of International Application PCT/US2021/049671, filed September 9, 2021, which claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/077029, filed September 11, 2020. Withdrawal of Rejections: The rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wikipedia, is withdrawn. The rejection of claims 1-6 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Atala et al., is withdrawn. New Rejections Necessitated by Amendment: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 as amended recites an outer-facing epidermal portion and an inner-facing dermal portion. This claim is indefinite, because it is unclear what an epidermal or dermal “portion” is intended to include or exclude; there is no guidance in the specification regarding these terms. For example, it is unclear if a single cell is intended to constitute a “portion,” or if/what certain percentage of a full dermal or epidermal layer meet this limitation. Claims 3-6 are included in this rejection as they depend from above rejected claim 1, and alone do not remedy the noted deficiencies. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Weinand (Degloving Injuries of Upper Extremity: A Strategy with Full Thickness Skin Mesh, World Journal of Plastic Surgery, Case Report, Vol. 7, No. 3, (Sept. 2018), pp. 372-376). With regard to claim 1, Weinand teaches a meshed full thickness skin graft (Abs.; Fig. 2), wherein a full thickness skin graft is a skin substitute comprising an outer-facing epidermal portion and an inner-facing dermal portion. The full thickness skin graft is configured to conform to the forearm of the subject to repair a degloving injury and is wrapped around the forearm completely to cover the underlying tissue (Abs.; Fig. 2), which is graft having at least one surface with an enclosed geometry, and circling back on itself so as to enclose the forearm. With regard to claims 3-6, Weinand teaches a full thickness skin graft (Fig. 2), wherein a full thickness skin graft comprises epidermal cells, including keratinocytes, and dermal cells, including fibroblasts (see Art of Record: Ramsey et al., p. 2, Anatomy and Physiology, Para. 1). Response to Arguments In view of Applicant’s amendments, all previous rejections have been withdrawn. Therefore, Applicant’s arguments are moot. However, new rejections have been set forth above. Conclusion No claims are allowable. Art of Record: Ramsey et al., Full-Thickness Skin Grafts, StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf, (Jan. 2026), pp. 1-8; Available online at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK532875/ (a full thickness skin graft comprises epidermal cells, including keratinocytes, and dermal cells, including fibroblasts). Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER M.H. TICHY whose telephone number is (571)272-3274. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 9:00am-7:00pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sharmila G. Landau can be reached at (571)272-0614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER M.H. TICHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 28, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jun 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12714729
Method of preparing a faecal microbiota sample
5y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702979
Isolation of Different Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Subpopulations
4y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697414
ADIPOSE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690582
VIABLE CELL COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS RELATED TO SAME
6y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12680921
Method and Device for Producing a Film-Shaped Test Body
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.5%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month