Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/115,782

DETACHABLE MODULARIZED TEST PLATFORM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 01, 2023
Examiner
BETIT, JACOB F
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shenzhen Longood Intelligent Electric Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 11m
To Grant
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allow Rate
53 granted / 151 resolved
-32.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 151 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dou et al. (CN 103439538 – machine translation provided). Regarding claim 1, Dou discloses (Figs. 1-3) a detachable modularized test platform (as shown in Figs. 1-3: each of the parts are detachable from at least one other part, replaceable: see Abstract), comprising a gantry (as shown in Figs. 1-3), a control box (area where 16 and 25 are located: [0013]; Fig. 3) and a jig box 15 [0013], wherein the jig box 15 is mounted on a bottom of the gantry (as shown in Figs. 1-3), a test area 151 [0014] is arranged on the jig box 15 (as shown in Figs. 1-3), an air cylinder 12 [0013] directly facing the test area 151 is arranged on the gantry (as shown in Figs. 1-3), a control assembly 16/25 is mounted in the control box [0013], and a test assembly 151/152 [0014] is mounted in the jig box (as shown in Figs. 1-3); the control box (area where 16 and 25 are located: [0013]; Fig. 3) is in communication connection with an upper computer (implicit, presets: [0018]) by means of the control assembly, the control assembly is connected to the test assembly for transmitting a signal [0018], during testing, a sample to be tested is placed on the test area of the jig box [0019-[0020], and the upper computer sends an instruction to control the air cylinder 12 to extend a driving rod to move to the sample to be tested [0018]; and the upper computer sends the instruction to the control assembly in the control box 16/25, to complete testing of the sample by providing different test conditions (timing: [0018]), and output test data [0018]. Dou does not disclose the control box is mounted on a side of the gantry; and upload test data to a server for saving. However, mounting the control box on a side of the gantry would be merely a rearrangement of parts, which is obvious – see MPEP 2144.04(VI)(C). Also, although Dou does not disclose uploading test data to a server for saving, the Examiner takes official notice that uploading test data to a server for saving was well-known in the art at the time the invention was filed. See MPEP 2144.03. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Dou’s device so that the control box is mounted on a side of the gantry; and to include uploading test data to a server for saving. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. The prior art of record does not show or suggest: “…the control assembly in the control box comprises a main circuit board, a functional circuit board and an electrical control component, the electrical control component is connected to the main circuit board, the functional circuit board is in insertion connection to the main circuit board and an adapter circuit board by means of terminals separately, and the adapter circuit board is connected to the test assembly in the jig box…” (as in claim 2) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Zhang (CN 204359825) discloses a test platform with a gantry, jig, air cylinder, and control box, as well as several of the control box features claimed by claim 2 (but not all, see Allowable Subject Matter, above). Swart (U.S. Pub. 2001/0015641) discloses a test platform with a gantry, jig, and control box, and test area. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Benjamin Schmitt, whose telephone number is (571) 270-7930. The examiner can normally be reached M-F | 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached on (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN R SCHMITT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 01, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 16, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 9339688
CORE EXERCISE APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 17, 2016
Patent 9043275
DATA SYNCHRONIZATION USING STRING MATCHING
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2015
Patent 9026539
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2015
Patent 9020954
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2015
Patent 8819054
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2014
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+16.3%)
4y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 151 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month