Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/116,308

NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, OUTPUT CONTROL METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 02, 2023
Examiner
WOO, ISAAC M
Art Unit
2163
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
1162 granted / 1271 resolved
+36.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1297
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§103
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§102
71.4%
+31.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1271 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-7 are pending. This action is response to the application filed on March 02, 2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim et al (US 20210325957 A1). With respect to claims 1 and 6-7, Kim et al teaches first acquiring, by inputting first data into a machine learning model, an estimation result output by the machine learning model (Abstract, receiving machine learning model input data from a requestor; processing the machine learning model input data with a machine learning model using processing hardware to generate first output data); when a first value included in the estimation result is lower than a threshold, by inputting the first data to a linear model generated based on the first data and the estimation result ([0037] FIG. 1C, uncertainty (low confidence) 130 in which classifications of observations may be considered relatively unreliable. [0049] step 206 with comparing the model output to a threshold value, such as an confidence threshold. a magnitude of the model output may be compared to the threshold value, second acquiring a second value output by the linear model ([0007] based on comparing the first output data to a threshold value; processing the machine learning model input data with the machine learning model using the processing hardware at the second power level to generate second output data; and means for sending second output data to the requestor); and controlling output of the estimation result based on a difference between the first value and the second value ([0093] the machine learning model comprises a linear classification model, and comparing the first output data to a threshold value comprises comparing a magnitude of an output of the linear classification model to the threshold value. [0118] FIG. 6, for receiving machine learning model input data; code 632 for processing the machine learning model input data with a machine learning model using processing to generate output data; code 634 for comparing model output data to a threshold; code 635 for sending second output data). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ISAAC M WOO whose telephone number is (571)272-4043. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tony Mahmoudi can be reached on 571-272-4078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ISAAC M WOO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2163
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596726
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT SEGMENTATION FOR FORECASTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591941
MEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585552
PROTECTION, RECOVERY, AND MIGRATION OF DATABASES-AS-A-SERVICE (DBAAS) AND/OR SERVERLESS DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (DBMS) IN CLOUD AND MULTI-CLOUD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585674
METADATA TAG AUTO-APPLICATION TO POSTED ENTRIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579167
DISTRIBUTED GRAPH-BASED CLUSTERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1271 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month